Home / Supreme Court / Diary 29264/2024

TARUN DHAMEJA v. SUNIL DHAMEJA

Supreme Court of India | Diary 29264/2024

Status

Judgment

Decided On

2024-12-06

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR, HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Petitioner

TARUN DHAMEJA

Respondent

SUNIL DHAMEJA

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

2024 INSC 973

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.14005 OF 2024 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 16377/2024)

TARUN DHAMEJA ..... APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

SUNIL DHAMEJA & ANR. ..... RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

In the present case, the arbitration clause in the Deed of

Partnership dated 16.07.2016 reads as under: -

“23. Arbitration That if at any time either during the continuance of the partnership or after the retirement of any partner, any dispute or difference shall arise between the partners or their respective heirs or any one claiming through or under them, the same shall be referred to arbitration. Arbitration shall be optional & the arbitrator will be appointed by partners with their mutual consent. In any case of dispute arise then the Jurisdiction of Indore Civil Court shall be applicable & acceptable by the partners.”

In our opinion, it cannot be said that the arbitration clause

is optional in the sense that the arbitration clause is non-

existent or that the matter would be referred to arbitration only

if all the parties to the dispute agree to refer the dispute to

arbitration.

In Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corpn.1, this Court

delineated the issue of interpretation and construction of an

1 (2021) 2 SCC 1.

1

arbitration clause and referred to the following observations in

Fili Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Premium Nafta Products Ltd.2: ...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India