1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
W. P.(Crl.) No(s). 515/2021
HARLAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
ORDER
The petitioner should move the jurisdictional High Court to
challenge the order denying benefit of premature release/remission.
However, as the petitioner has undergone more than 33 years of
actual imprisonment and approximately 45 years of imprisonment with
remission, we direct that the petitioner would be released on
interim bail/ furlough/ parole for a period of 30 days on the terms
and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court.
We also hope and trust that the petitioner would file Writ
Petition within the period of 30 days and the writ petition would
be taken up for consideration by the High Court as expeditiously as
possible. It will be open to the High Court to extend the interim
bail.
2
Recording the aforesaid, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
Pending application(s),if any, stand disposed of.
……………………………………………J. (SANJIV KHANNA)
……………………………………………J. (BELA M. TRIVEDI)
NEW DELHI 17th DECEMBER, 2021
3
ITEM NO.19 Court 16 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ...