IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.423-425/2024
HUZAFA JAMALI Petitioner(s) VERSUS
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Priyesh Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner.
2. It is pointed out by Mr. Divyank Panwar, learned counsel
appearing for the State of Rajasthan (respondent No.8) that of
the 12 Prosecution witnesses, 11 are residents of Rajasthan.
Therefore, the State opposes the prayer of Transfer of the
Criminal Cases to a Court in Madhya Pradesh.
3. Appearing for the Sate of Madhya Pradesh, Mr. Abhimanyu
Singh, learned counsel submits that chargesheet is filed in all
the three cases and the next step is to frame the charges.
4. Considering the above submission and the pleadings on
record, we are disinclined to allow the transfer petitions.
The same are dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall
stand closed.
.......................J. [ HRISHIKESH ROY ]
........................J. [ S.V.N. BHATTI ]
NEW DELHI; DECEMBER 19, 2024
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.4 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Transfer Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s).423-425/2024