IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.256 OF 2010
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ... APPELLANT(S)
VS.
NARESH KUMAR @ KAKA & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
We have heard Ms. Pratishtha Vij, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the Appellant/State of Himachal
Pradesh and Mr. Lalit Kumar, learned counsel for the
respondents/accused.
Ms. Pratishtha Vij, learned counsel submits the High
Court has grossly erred in reversing the well reasoned order
of conviction as recorded by the trial Court. She submits
that even after the matter was remanded to the High Court by
this Court, the High Court has committed the same error,
once again. She therefore submits that the appeal deserves
to be allowed.
We have perused the impugned judgment and order passed
by the High Court. The scope of interference in an appeal
against acquittal is very limited. Unless the finding is
found to be perverse or impossible, it is not permissible
for this Court to reverse the same.
1
Though Ms. Pratishtha Vij, learned counsel has made her
best attempts, she has not been in a position to persuade us
to point out any perversity or impossibility in the approach
adopted by the High Court. The appeal is, accordingly
dismissed.