IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)NO.9111 of 2022)
NAUSHAD AHMAD ANSARI … APPELLANTS
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. … RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard Ms. S. Janani, learned senior counsel for
the appellant-complainant and learned counsel for
the respondent. Respondent No.2 has been served
but chosen not to appear.
3. The appellant-complainant is aggrieved by the
order dated 15th March, 2019 passed by the High
Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal
Revision No.347 of 2013 titled Wajahat Ansari vs.
State of Uttarakhand & Anr., whereby a criminal
revision petition under Section 397 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was allowed and
the criminal proceedings under Section 365/511 and
506 Indian Penal Code, 1860 were quashed.
1
4. In short, the facts are that the complainant-
appellant allegedly attempted to be abducted by
accused-respondent No. 2, from which the former
somehow escaped and then took recourse to the law.
FIR No.11/2001 under the above-mentioned Section
was filed at the Chowki Bidal, Kantgarhi Police
Station on 19th February, 2001. The complaint, on
the basis of which the FIR stood registered, reads
as under :
“To Sir, SHO, Police Station Gari Cant Dehradun Respected Sir it is prayed that today dated 19.2.2001 time 9.00 a.m. when I was wor...