IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1511 OF 2010
VIKRAM NAIR ... APPELLANT(S)
VS.
STATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH) ... RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
1. The present appeal challenges the judgment and order
dated 25th November, 2009 passed by the High Court of
Chhattisgarh, thereby partly allowing the appeal filed by
the appellant. The learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Baikunthpur, by order dated 31st March, 1989 had convicted
the appellant for the offences punishable under Section 302
of the Indian Penal Code (For short “the IPC”). The High
Court, by the impugned judgment and order, converted the
conviction of the appellant to Part-I of Section 304 IPC and
sentenced him to suffer RI for 10 years.
2. We have heard Mr. Santosh Paul, learned senior counsel
for the appellant and Mr. Gautam Narayan, learned counsel
for the respondent-State of Chhattisgarh.
1
3. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submits that
evidence of the witnesses, particularly PW-4 and PW-5, would
clearly reveal that the incident occurred on account of a
fight between the deceased and the appellant. He further
submits, that it was the deceased who had started the
quarrel and was an aggressor. He therefore submits that the
case of the appellant at the most would fall under Part-II
of Sectio...