1
CORRECTED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 891 /2020
[@ SLP [CRL.] NO.4338/2020]
ANURAG ANAND KOSARIYA Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF CHHATTTISGARH & ANR. Respondent(s)
O R D E R
An adjournment slip was circulated by learned counsel for the
petitioner but learned counsel has joined the proceedings.
Leave granted.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
On the conspectus of the matter, we direct that the amount
deposited by the appellant of Rs.10,80,000/- before this Court
which was directed to be kept in an FDR be transmitted to the trial
Court after the FDR matures on completion of 91 days. Out of this
amount of Rs.10,80,000/- a sum of Rs,10,10,000/- (an amount of
Rs.70,000/- has already been admittedly paid) be released to
respondent No.2/complainant by the trial Court and the sum of
Rs.70,000/- can be refunded back to the appellant by the trial
Court.
2
At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant and
respondent No.2 state that the aforesaid can put the complete
matter to rest and the proceedings initiated by respondent No.2 can
be quashed with consent. Learned counsel for the State/respondent
No.1 did initially object to the aforesaid but cannot dispute that
the State has better and many more cases to prosecute rather than a
dispute of this nature.
In vi...