Home / Supreme Court / Diary 1462/1953

RAJ RAJENDRA MALOJIRAO SHITOLE v. THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT.RAJA BALBHADRA SINGHV.THE STATE

Supreme Court of India | Diary 1462/1953

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1954-02-02

Bench

MAHAJAN MEHAR CHAND (CJ),MUKHERJEA B.K.,DAS SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE VIVIAN,HASAN GHULAM

Petitioner

RAJ RAJENDRA MALOJIRAO SHITOLE

Respondent

THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT.RAJA BALBHADRA SINGHV.THE STATE

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 9

PETITIONER: RAJ RAJENDRA MALOJIRAO SHITOLE

Vs.

RESPONDENT: THE STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT.RAJA BALBHADRA SINGHV.THE STATE O

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/1954

BENCH: MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) BENCH: MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ) MUKHERJEA, B.K. DAS, SUDHI RANJAN BOSE, VIVIAN HASAN, GHULAM

CITATION: 1954 AIR 259 1954 SCR 748 CITATOR INFO : R 1955 SC 817 (16)

ACT: Constitution of India, art. 385--Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act (XXVIII of 1951)--Whether void as not passed by a validly constituted legislature.

HEADNOTE: The decision of the Madhya Bharat High Court declaring section 4 (1) (g) and sub-cls. (iv) and (v) of cl. 4 of Schedule I of Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act (XXVIII of 1951) as illegal and inoperative was not questioned by either of the parties. It was however, contended that the impugned Act (XXVIII of 1951) was void as it was not passed by a validly constituted legislature within the meaning of the covenant entered into by the Rulers of Madhya Bharat as the provisions of cl. 1(c) of Schedule IV of the covenant for the election of 20 members were not complied with. Held, that as the Madhya Bharat Legislative Assembly actually functioning on the 26th January, 1950, the validity of the Acts passed by it could not be questioned in view of art. 385 of the Constitution irre...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India