http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 19
PETITIONER: MORAN MAR BASSELIOS CATHOLICOS AND ANOTHER
Vs.
RESPONDENT: THE MOST REV. MAR POULOSE ATHANASIUS AND OTHERS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/05/1954
BENCH: JAGANNADHADAS, B. BENCH: JAGANNADHADAS, B. DAS, SUDHI RANJAN HASAN, GHULAM
CITATION: 1954 AIR 526 1955 SCR 520 CITATOR INFO : RF 1959 SC 31 (18) D 1970 SC 540 (11)
ACT: Travancore Code of Civil Procedure (VIII of 1100)s. 87- Review provisions-Similar to provisions of Order 47, rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Court’s misconception of an alleged concession by advocate of a party -Remedy in such a case-Error apparent on the face of the record- Ejectment suit-Plaintiff’s duty -Travancore Regulation IV of 1099-United State of Travancore Cochin High Court Act V of 1125, s. 25-Constitution of India, arts. 214, 225-Appeal filed before June, 1949, in Travancore High Court--Disposal of-By the High Court of Part B State of Travancore-Cochin.
HEADNOTE: The provisions of the Travancore Code of Civil Procedure are similar in terms to Order 47, rule 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 and an application for review is circumscribed by the definitive limits fixed by the language used therein. The words "any other sufficient reason" mean a reason sufficient on grounds at least analogous to those specified in the rule. It is well settled that in an ejectment suit the...