IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 Arising out of SLP (C) No.4488/2022
PRAKASH S/O PURUSHOTTAM ZADE APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
DIGAMBAR S/O VASANTRAO GHAROTE RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
2. Heard Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant (plaintiff). Also heard Mr. Sachin Patil, learned counsel
appearing for the respondent (defendant).
3. We have perused the reasoning given by the High Court to
disallow amendment of the plaint, as claimed by the appellant. We
see no infirmity in those reasoning. The appeal, accordingly stands
dismissed.
4. This order will not have any bearing on the merit of the
pending appeal before the learned District Judge-1, Warora.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.
……...…….………………………………………J. (HRISHIKESH ROY)
……...…….………………………………………J. (S.V.N. BHATTI)
NEW DELHI; DECEMBER 17, 2024
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4488/2022
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 05-08-2019 in WP No. 5533/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur]