Home / Supreme Court / Diary 12/1956

MESSRS BASANT LAL BANARSI LAL v. BANSI LAL DAGDULAL

Supreme Court of India | Diary 12/1956

Status

Judgment

Decided On

1960-11-30

Bench

GAJENDRAGADKAR P.B.,SARKAR A.K.,SUBBARAO K.,WANCHOO K.N.,MUDHOLKAR J.R.

Petitioner

MESSRS BASANT LAL BANARSI LAL

Respondent

BANSI LAL DAGDULAL

Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 8

PETITIONER: MESSRS BASANT LAL BANARSI LAL

Vs.

RESPONDENT: BANSI LAL DAGDULAL

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/11/1960

BENCH: SARKAR, A.K. BENCH: SARKAR, A.K. GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. SUBBARAO, K. WANCHOO, K.N. MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

CITATION: 1961 AIR 823 1961 SCR (2) 780

ACT: Forward Contracts in Oilseeds--If illegal in Greater Bombay--Bombay Forward Contracts Control Act, 1947 (Bom. LXIV of 1947), s. 3--Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 (XXIV of 1946), s. 8.

HEADNOTE: Various contracts for sale of goods had been made between the parties in Bombay each of which contained an arbitration clause. Disputes having arisen in March, 1952, in respect of these contracts, they were referred to arbitration and a composite award was made on October 7, 1952, against the respondent. One of these disputes had arisen out of a forward contract in groundnuts. The respondent applied to have the award set aside on the ground that the forward contract in groundnuts was illegal as such a contract was prohibited by the Oilseeds (Forward Contract Prohibition) Order, 1943, issued under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, passed by the Central Legislature. The appellant contended that the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, was repugnant to the Bombay Forward Contracts Control Act, 1947, passed by the Provincial Legislature of Bom...

Related

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India