Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2015 / Diary 10301

SUBHITA v. STATE OF HARYANA .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10301/2015

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

07-05-2015

Bench

Petitioner

SUBHITA

Respondent

STATE OF HARYANA .

casestatus.in Summary

Observations recorded by a Sessions Judge while rejecting an application under Section 319 CrPC do not bind or prejudice the judge's final evaluation of witness evidence at trial. As analysed on casestatus.in, such interlocutory remarks must be treated as non-conclusive, preserving judicial impartiality during the substantive appreciation of evidence.

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3573/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/02/2015 in CRR No. 83/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUBHITA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 07/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anant A. Rangi, Adv. Mr. Sarva Mitter, Adv. For M/s Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. While declining to interfere, we are disposed to observe that any observation made by the learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, shall not waive with him while evaluating the evidence of the witnesses finally. With the aforesaid observation, the special leave petition stands disposed of. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

Ì ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3573/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06/02/2015 in CRR No. 83/2014 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SUBHITA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief) Date : 07/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Anant A. Rangi, Adv. Mr. Sarva Mitter, Adv. For M/s Mitter & Mitter Co.,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. While declining to interfere, we are disposed to observe that any observation made by the learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, shall not waive with him while evaluating the evidence of the witnesses finally. With the aforesaid observation, the special leave petition stands disposed of.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.05.0717:07:26 ISTReason: (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India