Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2014 / Diary 10297

STATE OF GUJARAT v. SAURASHTRA SHRAMIK SANGH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10297/2014

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

24-04-2014

Bench

Petitioner

STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent

SAURASHTRA SHRAMIK SANGH

casestatus.in Summary

A review petition filed with a delay of 221 days and lacking satisfactory explanation is liable to dismissal on the ground of delay alone, independently of merits. Courts may nonetheless examine the matter on merit in the interest of justice, and where no grounds for interference are found, dismissal on both delay and merit is warranted. This analysis is brought to you by casestatus.in, where such procedural principles under Indian civil appellate jurisdiction are tracked and summarised.

Download PDF Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

\212CHAMBER MATTER SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSREVIEW PETITION(C) NO. 907/2014 IN SLP(C) NO.23133/2014STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUSSAURASHTRA SHRAMIK SANGH Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing review petition and officereport)Date: 24/04/2014 This Petition was circulated today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R Review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order. (NAVEEN KUMAR) (S.S.R. KRISHNA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 907 OF 2014 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 23133/2013State of Gujarat & Anr. Petitioners VersusSaurashtra Shramik Sangh Respondent O R D E R There is a delay of 221 days in filing thepresent Review Petition, for which no satisfactoryexplanation has been offered. The Review Petition isliable to be dismissed on the ground of delay alone.In spite of huge delay, we have carefully gone through

the Review Petition and the connected papers forconsidering the same on merit in the interest ofjustice, but we see no reason to interfere with theorder impugned. The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissedon the ground of delay as also on merit. ..........................J. [GYAN SUDHA MISRA] ..........................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]New DelhiApril 24, 2014

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India