SECTION XVII Listed on: 11.08.2014 Court No. Item No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 23037 OF 2012 Chandulal Sahu ... Petitioner VERSUS Narayan Das Inklab Gandhi & Ors. … Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13 th July, 2012, when the court was pleased to pass the following order: “Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to para 9 of the election petition filed by the respondent in the judgement of this Court in Civil Appeal NO.4847 of 2012 (Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Charandas Mahant & Ors.). Issue notice on the SLP as well as on the application for stay. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted.” It is submitted that there are originally 17 respondents in the matter and Respondent No.2 to 17 have been deleted vide Court's order dated 15.07.2013 the name of respondent Nos.2 to 17 has been deleted from the array of party. It is submitted that Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., Advocate has on 05.03.2013 filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1 but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. The matter was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar when the following order was passed: “ Despite final chance granted on the last date, respondent No.1 has failed to file counter affidavit. Request for further grant of time is rejected. Respondent Nos.2 to 17 have been already deleted from the array of the respondents, as per the order of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers dated 15.7.2013. No further steps required. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.” ...P/2
2 The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Harish Pandey, Advocate Mr. Vinodh Kanna B. Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
° ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.8 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23037/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18/07/2011 in IA No.5 in EP No.16/2009 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur) CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUS NARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 11/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi,Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi,Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mayank Upadhyay,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Soumyajit Pani,Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, since the main election petition has been disposed of, nothing survives for adjudication in this special leave petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. (NARENDRA PRASAD)Signature Not Verified (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTERDigitally signed by COURT MASTERNarendra PrasadDate: 2014.08.1216:38:01 ISTReason:
SECTION XVII MATTER FOR. 13.09.2013 R/COURT NO. ITEM NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 23037 OF 2012 Chandulal Sahu .... Petitioner VERSUS Narayan Das Inklab Gandhi & ors. .... Respondents OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 23 rd August, 2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “On the request of the learned counsel for respondent No.1, two weeks' time is granted for filing counter affidavit. It is pertinent to note that respondent Nos.2 to 17 have already been deleted from the array of the parties, as per the order of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers passed on 15.7.2013. List again on 13.9.2013..” It is submitted that counsel for respondent no. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this office report. DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Harish Pandey, Advocate Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23037/2012CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 13/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B.,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Three weeks' time is granted, as a final chance, to respondent No.1for filing counter affidavit on record. Respondent Nos.2 to 17 have been already deleted from the array ofthe respondents, as per the order of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers dated15.7.2013. list again on 23.10.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
`ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23037/2012CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 23/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vinodh Kanna B.,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of the learned counsel for respondent No.1, two weeks'time is granted for filing counter affidavit. It is pertinent to note that respondent Nos.2 to 17 have already beendeleted from the array of the parties, as per the order of the Hon'bleJudge in Chambers passed on 15.7.2013. List again on 13.9.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
$ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 3/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)No(s).23037/2012(From the judgement and order dated 18/07/2011 in IA No.16/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)(With deletion of proforma Respondents and Office Report)Date: 15/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Soumya Jit Pani, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B.,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This application has been filed with the prayer as follows : "(a) delete the name of proform respondent Nos.2-17 from the array of parties" The applicant is the petitioner in SLP (C) No.23037/2012 who is a returned candidate and a sitting member of the Parliament. Challenging the Election of the petitioner, an election petition was filed in the High Court. It appears that the petitioner had filed I.A. in Election Petition No.16 of 2009 before the High : 2 : Court which was rejected by the High Court. Hence the instant Special Leave Petition. An application in the Special Leave Petition is filed with the prayer above noted. It is for the petitioner/applicant to choose his opponents. Whether the dropping of Respondent Nos.2 to 17 from the array of respondents would have any legal implication in so far as this I.A is concerned is not a matter to be examined at this stage. The application is allowed, as prayed for. (GEETA AHUJA) (INDU POKHRIYAL) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
þITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23037/2012CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 05/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Mr SoumyajitPani appearing on behalf of Mr B Vinodh Kanna, Advocate-on-record hasprayed for grant of time for filing counter affidavit. Four weeks' timegranted. Complete set of paper books be supplied. List again on 12.4.2013. An application for deleting respondent Nos. 2 to 17 from the arrayof respondents has been moved by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner. Samebe placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
úITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23037/2012CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 29/01/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat barring respondent No.1, rest of the respondents are proformarespondents and he would be taking necessary steps for their deletion bynext date. List again on 5.3.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
àITEM NO.21 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 11379/2012(From the judgement and order dated 18/07/2011 in IA No.16/2009 of The HIG COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR)CHANDULAL SAHU Petitioner(s) VERSUSNARAYAN DAS INKLAB GANDHI & ORS. Respondent(s)with I.A. No. 1 (c/delay in filing SLP, c/delay in refiling SLP and officereport ))Date: 13/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Adv. Ms. Shabam, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to para 9 of the electionpetition filed by the respondent in the judgment of this Court in CivilAppeal No. 4847 of 2012 (Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Charandas Mahant &Ors.) Issue notice on the SLP as well as on the application for stay. Dasti, in addition, is also permitted.|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Veena Khera) ||Court Master | |Court Master |