ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11420/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2015 in WPC No.5791/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras) THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CHENNAI-3 Petitioner(s) VERSUS R.M. THANDAYUTHAPANI Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Sharma, Adv. Ms.R.Shase, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. V. Saravana Raja, Adv. Mr.Abhilash Attri, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
Listed on 10.8.2015 Court No. 4 Item No. 66 SECTION XII IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 11420 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CHENNAI -3 ...PETITIONER VERSUS R. M. THANDAYUTHAPANI ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 20 th April, 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “ Issue notice. Mr.P.V.Saravana Raja, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. “ It is submitted that there is sole respondent and is represented by Mr. P.V. Sarvana Raja, Advocate but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. Service of notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this, the 7 th day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: 1. Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate 2. Mr. P.V. Sarvana Raja, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR vk
þ ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11420/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2015 in WPC No.5791/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras) THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CHENNAI-3 Petitioner(s) VERSUS R.M. THANDAYUTHAPANI Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 10/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Sharma, Adv. Ms.R.Shase, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. P. V. Saravana Raja, Adv. Mr.Abhilash Attri, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar YadavDate: 2015.08.1016:28:42 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11420/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2015 in WPC No.5791/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras) THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CHENNAI-3 Petitioner(s) VERSUS R.M. THANDAYUTHAPANI Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, Sr.Adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad, AAG Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. Mrs.Niraimathi, Adv. Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.P.V.Saravana Raja, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mr.P.V.Saravana Raja, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER
\204 ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.4 SECTION XII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).11420/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20/03/2015 in WPC No.5791/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras) THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CHENNAI-3 Petitioner(s) VERSUS R.M. THANDAYUTHAPANI Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 20/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mukul Rohtagi, Sr.Adv. Mr.Subramonium Prasad, AAG Mr. B. Balaji, Adv. Mrs.Niraimathi, Adv. Mr.R.Rakesh Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.P.V.Saravana Raja, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Mr.P.V.Saravana Raja, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment shall remain stayed.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar YadavDate: 2015.04.2016:46:00 ISTReason: (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RENUKA SADANA) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER