Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2021 / Diary 1028

PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Supreme Court of India | Diary 1028/2021

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

11-04-2022

Bench

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

Petitioner

PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY

Respondent

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

casestatus.in Summary

Where interim bail was initially granted and the accused has not misused it, such interim bail may be confirmed as regular bail, disposing of the special leave petition without further adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

R E V I S E D (A P P E A R A N C E) ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 857/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-11-2020 in TBA No. 9/2020 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 11-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Khandelwal, Adv. Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2021. There is no allegation against the petitioner of misusing the interim bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is going on. The interim bail granted on 05.02.2021, is, accordingly confirmed. The special leave petition is, accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANISH ISSRANI) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.8 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 857/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-11-2020 in TBA No. 9/2020 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 11-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR Ms. Prerna Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Khandelwal, Adv. Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner was granted interim bail by this Court vide order dated 05.02.2021. There is no allegation against the petitioner of misusing the interim bail. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is going on. The interim bail granted on 05.02.2021, is, accordingly confirmed. The special leave petition is, accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANISH ISSRANI) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.16 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).857/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-11-2020 in TBA No.9/2020 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 09-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Khandelwal, Adv. Ms. Agrimaa Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Atul Sharma, AOR Mr. Vikas Negi, Adv. Dr. O.P. Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking an adjournment of two weeks on the ground of personal difficulty, let the matter be listed after two weeks. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.13 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 857/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-11-2020 in TBA No. 9/2020 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) PANKAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 05-02-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Singh,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh,Adv. Mr. Rahul Mishra,Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. In the meantime, the petitioner is directed to be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court. (MADHU BALA) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India