ITEM NO.43 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Civil Appeal No(s). 2313/2021 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S CANARA BANK Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4822/2021 (IV-A) Date : 16-03-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Seema Patnaha Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R In both the matters numbered above, affidavit of valuation and Court fees have been filed. Service is complete. Ld. Counsel shall file the statement of case within the stipulated period. Thereafter, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Registrar MG
ITEM NO.17 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Civil Appeal No(s). 2313/2021 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S CANARA BANK Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4822/2021 (IV-A) Date : 11-02-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ashok Kumar Adv Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R In both the matters numbered above, Ld. counsel for the appellants shall within a period of two weeks, as last chance file the affidavit of valuation alongwith ad-valorem Court fee. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Kunal Verma, Ld. Counsel submits that his name is not shown in the Office Report he has already filed the vakalatnama in C.A. No. 2313/2021. Office shall verify the same. If it is so, four weeks’ time is given to file the counter affidavit. List again on 16.3.2022. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Registrar MG
ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Civil Appeal No(s). 2313/2021 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S CANARA BANK Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 4822/2021 (IV-A) Date : 07-01-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R In both the matters numbered above, learned counsel for the appellants shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit of valuation and requisite court fee. List again on 11.2.2022. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Registrar MG
ITEM NO.8 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6625/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-10-2020 in ITA No. 418/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS VIJAYA BANK (NOW MERGED WITH BANK OF BARODA) Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58621/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PROVIDE LINK TO SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA. Date : 16-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Ld. ASG Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment is allowed. Learned ASG submits that there is a policy framed insofar as the settlement of disputes between public sector enterprises and Government is concerned but insofar as the revenue matter is concerned, a conscious decision has been taken not to bring the disputes within the policy. Leave granted. Tag with Civil Appeal No.2313/2021. [ASHA SUNDRIYAL] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
1 ITEM NO.9 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6625/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-10-2020 in ITA No. 418/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS VIJAYA BANK (NOW MERGED WITH BANK OF BARODA) Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58621/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 09-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Pushkarna, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Digvijay Dam, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks to contend that the impugned judgment makes a reference to another judgment passed on the same date where the substantial questions of law framed have been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. Learned counsel submits that the said judgment is in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. M/s. Canara Bank against which an SLP was filed being SLP [C] No.7142/2021 and in which leave is stated to have been granted on 30.06.2021.
2 Since the aforesaid fact was not available at the time of filing of the present SLP and has not been brought on record, the Registry has not submitted an office report in this behalf. The Registry to verify this aspect. We also find that whether it is the present Special Leave Petition or the relied upon judgment, the only question is which pocket of the Government is enriched as we are dealing with two separate nationalized Banks as respondents in the two appeals and the Tax Department as the petitioner. We would thus, call upon learned Solicitor General to also assist us in this behalf as to whether such nature of cases ought to come before the Court and should they not be sorted out within the Government. List on 16.08.2021. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.13 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7142/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-10-2020 in ITA No. 419/2012 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S CANARA BANK Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. ) Date : 30-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Ms. Swarupma Chaturvedi, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER