1 ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No. 92/2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 25/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Chand Kiran, Adv. Ms. Charu Lata Chaudhary, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material. We find no merit in this special leave petition. It is accordingly dismissed. However, we record the offer of the respondent-husband that he will deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) in the name of his daughter within two months from today.
2 We make it clear that this order will not govern any other proceeding(s) that may be pending between the parties. (Neetu Khajuria) Court Master (Asha Soni) Court Master
1ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32348/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013in MATA No. 92/2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSN.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 25/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv.Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv.Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.Mr. Chand Kiran, Adv.Ms. Charu Lata Chaudhary, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RHeard the learned counsels for the partiesand perused the relevant material. We find no merit in this special leavepetition. It is accordingly dismissed.However, we record the offer of therespondent-husband that he will deposit a sum ofRs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) in the nameof his daughter within two months from today.2We make it clear that this order will notgovern any other proceeding(s) that may be pendingbetween the parties.(Neetu Khajuria)Court Master (Asha Soni)Court Master
ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No. 92/2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. For Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Murari Lal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by the counsel for the petitioner. List the matter after two weeks. (Neetu Khajuria) Court Master (Asha Soni) Court Master
Ò ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No. 92/2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. For Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Murari Lal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by the counsel for the petitioner. List the matter after two weeks.Signature Not Verified (Neetu Khajuria) (Asha Soni)Digitally signed byNEETU KHAJURIA Court Master Court MasterDate: 2016.08.2712:44:04 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No.92/2009 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions and interim relief and office report) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Chand Kiran, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Murari Lal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By order dated 14.08.2014, the matter was sent to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of a settlement between the parties but a failure report has been received from the said mediation centre. Let this matter be listed after four weeks on any non-miscellaneous day. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ª ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No.92/2009 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for directions and interim relief and office report) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Chand Kiran, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Murari Lal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R By order dated 14.08.2014, the matter was sent to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of a settlement between the parties but a failure report has been received from the said mediation centre. Let this matter be listed after four weeks on any non-miscellaneous day.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.04.0115:54:55 ISTReason: (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32348/2013 SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and interim relief and office report) Date : 23/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Puran Chand, Adv. Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ajit Kr. Ekka, Adv. Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation report is still awaited. List again on 13.4.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar
Listed on 23.02.2015 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. 1 Item No. 33 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 32348/2013 Suman Kaushik Petitioner VERSUS N.P. Kaushik Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.08.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties would like to approach the Supreme Court Mediation Centre on 01.09.2014 to explore the possibility of a settlement. Let the parties appear before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. The Supreme Court Mediation Centre shall make an effort to settle the matter and submit its report to this Court. List the matter after receipt of the report of the Supreme Court Mediation Centre.” It is submitted that aforesaid order was communicated to coordinator Supreme Court Mediation Centre vide this Registry's letter dated 22.08.2014 and mediation report is still awaited. Service is already complete in the matter. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 20 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr . Rajappa, Advocate Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-2/Avi
Listed on 14.08.2014 Before Court No. 6 Item No. 38 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 32348/2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2 (Application for Directions) Suman Kaushik Petitioner VERSUS N.P. Kaushik Respondent OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 09.12.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is anxious about the future of her daughter. In the circumstances, we feel that the parties should approach the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Hence, we issue notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks.” It is submitted that as directed above the aforesaid order was communicated to Supreme Court Mediation Centre vide this Registry's letter dated 28.01.2014 after issuing Show cause notice to the sole Respondent on 16.12.2013 by registered A.D. Dr. Krishna Singh, Advocate has on 25.01.2014 filed Vakalanama/Appearance on behalf of the Respondent but he has not filed Counter Affidavit so far. It is further submitted that Supreme Court Mediation Centre has not sent the Mediation report so far. It is further submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has on 8.8.2014 filed an application for directions (Regd. as I.A. No.2) and the same is being circulated herewith. Service is complete. The matter alongwith application above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 11 th DAY OF August, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr . Rajappa, Advocate Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-2/Avi
¤ ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32348/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No. 92/2009 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 14/08/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan ,Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. Chand Kiran, Adv. Mr. Murari Lal, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties would like to approach the Supreme Court Mediation Centre on 01.09.2014 to explore the possibility of a settlement. Let the parties appear before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. The Supreme Court Mediation Centre shall make an effort to settle the matter and submit its report to this Court. List the matter after receipt of the report of the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (Indu Pokhriyal)Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by Court Master Court MasterGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2014.08.2210:28:44 ISTReason:
¾ ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32348/2013 SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUS N.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s) Date : 23/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr Puran Chand, Adv. Mr. S. Rajappa ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Chand Kiran, Adv. Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete on the sole respondent. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byHema JoshiDate: 2014.07.2510:07:14 ISTReason:
\210ITEM NO.60 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32348/2013SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSN.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 07/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Ajit Kumar Ekka, Adv. Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mediation Report is still awaited from the SupremeCourt Mediation Centre. Till then right of respondent to file counteraffidavit is kept in abeyance. List again on 23.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARhj
\232ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32348/2013SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSN.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 24/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Puran Chand, Adv. Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent appeared in person has made a submission at Bar that hehas engaged the services of the learned Advocate, Dr. K.S. Chauhan whosevakalatnama has been filed on record. Registry to ascertain and verify thesame. Six weeks' time is granted to the respondent for filing counteraffidavit on record subject to service of the complete set of the pleadingson the learned counsel appearing on his behalf within three weeks of whichnecessary proof be filed on record. List again on 7.4.2014.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
<ITEM NO.26 Court No.14 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).32348/2013(From the judgement and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No.92/2009 of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSN.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s)Date: 09/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is anxious about the future of her daughter. In the circumstances, we feel that the parties should approach the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Hence, we issue notice to the respondent returnable in four weeks. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master |Assistant Registrar |
jITEM NO.15 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSIA 1/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 17693/2013(From the judgement and order dated 14/01/2013 in MATA No.92/2009, of TheHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)SUMAN KAUSHIK Petitioner(s) VERSUSN.P. KAUSHIK Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 04/10/2013 This application was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA [IN CHAMBERS]For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Rajappa,Adv. Mr. H. Jayaraman, Adv. Dr. Puran Chand, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay stands condoned.|(Nidhi Ahuja) | |(Indu Bala Kapur) ||Court Master | |Court Master |