STATE OF PUNJAB . v. UMESH KUMAR .

ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013 in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and interim relief and office report) Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG Mr. Apoorv Singhal,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The special leave petition is dismissed. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

SECTION IV B                         Listed on 13.1.2017               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. 3              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   42 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17.10.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :­ “Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay of delay in filing SLP as well as on the Special Leave Petition. The contempt proceedings shall remain stayed, in the meantime.”   Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the 48 respondents through Registered A.D. Post. Respondent Nos.1­3, 5­17 are represented through Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 18­28, 33­36, 38­47 are represented through Mr. B.S Gupta, Advocate. But no Counter Affidavit has been filed on their behalf so far. Respondent Nos. 4, 29­32, 37 and 48 have been served through Affidavit of Dasti service but no one has entered appearance  on their behalf so far. Service of show cause notice is  complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar on 29.7.2016 when the following order was passed :­  “ Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed

thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.” The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.   Dated this the 11th day of January, 2017.          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. 312, M.C Setalvad, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

.ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana AtChandigarh)STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and interim relief and office report)Date : 13/01/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAGMr. Apoorv Singhal,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.The special leave petition is dismissed.[O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 29/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.sc6347 (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar SB

SECTION IV B                         Listed on 29.7.2016               IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. R­2             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   51 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT  The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 8.3.2016 when the following order was passed :­   “ All the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite last opportunity. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 21.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.4,29,31,32,37 and 48 in spite of last chance granted. As a matter of indulgence, two weeks time as last chance is given to do the needful. In case, no steps are taken, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Hon'ble Court (In Chamber)) on 8.7.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :­  “ As requested, four weeks' time is granted to the  learned counsel for the petitioners for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of the respondent nos. 4,29,31,32,37 & 48.”    It is submitted that counsel for the petitioner has on

21.7.2016 filed Affidavit of Dasti service along with Proof in respect of respondent Nos.  4,29,31,32,37 & 48. stating therein that all the said respondents have been served. Service of show cause notice is  complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.  Dated this the 27th  day of July, 2016. .         ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. 312, M.C Setalvad, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

\216 ITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 29/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Ld.counsel for the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.sc6347 (CHIRAG BHANU SINGH) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byPOOJA SHARMADate: 2016.08.0110:11:59 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013 in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s) (office report on default) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing affidavit of dasti service in respect of the respondent nos. 4,29,31,32,37 & 48. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

SECTION IV B                         Ch.  matter  Listed on                 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No.               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.    PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 8.3.2016 when the following order was passed :­   “ All the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite last opportunity. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 21.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.4,29,31,32,37 and 48 in spite of last chance granted. As a matter of indulgence, two weeks time as last chance is given to do the needful. In case, no steps are taken, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.” It is submitted that  fresh Show Cause Notice to unserved respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 was issued by Registered A.D. Post as well as Dasti on 09.10.2015. But counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of Dasti service in terms of Ld. Registrar order dated 8.3.2016. Time granted for the same has expired on 22.3.2016.

The office report on default in the matter mentioned above is listed before the  Hon'ble Court(In Chamber).  Dated this the 8th day of April, 2016.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. 312, M.C Setalvad, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR neeraj

ÄITEM NO.49 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013 in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondent(s)(office report on default)Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI [IN CHAMBER]For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested, four weeks' time is granted to thelearned counsel for the petitioners for filing affidavitof dasti service in respect of the respondent nos.4,29,31,32,37 & 48. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (MADHU NARULA) COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 08/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.K.Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite last opportunity. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 21.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.4,29,31,32,37 and 48 in spite of last chance granted. As a matter of indulgence, two weeks time as last chance is given to do the needful. In case, no steps are taken, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (Chirag Bhanu Singh) Registrar SB

SECTION IV B                 Listed on 08.03.2016              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. R­2             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   35 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 21.1.2016 when the following order was passed :­   “ Four weeks time, as last chance is given to all the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 4.11.2015 of this Court in respect of all the unserved respondents. List again on 8.3.2016.” It is submitted that  there are total 48 respondents. Fresh Show Cause Notice to respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 was issued by Registered A.D. Post as well as Dasti on 09.10.2015. But neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of Dasti so far. Respondent No. 30 is served by Registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 to 17 are represented through Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 18­28, 33­36, 38­47 are represented through Mr. Balbir Singh

Gupta, Advocate. But both the Advocates have not filed counter affidavits so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 8th day of March, 2016.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR nks

ÚITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 08/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.K.Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAll the appearing respondents have failed to file the counteraffidavit despite last opportunity.Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the orderdated 21.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondentNos.4,29,31,32,37 and 48 in spite of last chance granted. As a matterof indulgence, two weeks time as last chance is given to do theneedful. In case, no steps are taken, list the matter before theHon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. (Chirag Bhanu Singh) RegistrarSB

Î ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.CHIRAG BHANU SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 08/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.K.Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit despite last opportunity. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 21.01.2016 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.4,29,31,32,37 and 48 in spite of last chance granted. As a matter of indulgence, two weeks time as last chance is given to do the needful. In case, no steps are taken, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.03.0914:25:02 TLTReason: (Chirag Bhanu Singh) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 21/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anant Vatsger,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time, as last chance is given to all the appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 4.11.2015 of this Court in respect of all the unserved respondents. List again on 8.3.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IV B                 Listed on 21.01.2016              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. R­2             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   82 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.11.2015 when the following order was passed :­   “ The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be given.  Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents.  List again on 21.1.2016.” It is submitted that  there are total 48 respondents. Fresh Show Cause Notice to respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 was issued by Registered A.D. Post as well as Dasti on 09.10.2015. But neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of Dasti so far. Respondent No. 30 is served by Registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 to 17 are represented through Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 18­28, 33­36, 38­47 are represented through Mr. Balbir Singh

Gupta, Advocate. But both the Advocates have not filed counter affidavits so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 20 th  day of January, 2016.        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR nks

^ITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date : 21/01/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anant Vatsger,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time, as last chance is given to all the appearingrespondents to file the counter affidavit. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learnedcounsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the orderdated 4.11.2015 of this Court in respect of all the unservedrespondents. List again on 8.3.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarMG

ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 04/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.K. Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be given. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. List again on 21.1.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar MG

SECTION IV B                 Listed on 04.11.2015              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. R­2             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   63 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 18.08.2015 when the following order was passed :­    “The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 04.11.2015.” It is submitted that  there are total 48 respondents. Fresh Show Cause Notice to respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 was issued by Registered A.D. Post as well as Dasti on 09.10.2015. But neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed affidavit of Dasti so far. Respondent No. 30 is served by Registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 to 17 are represented through Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 18­28,

33­36, 38­47 are represented through Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. But both the Advocates have not filed counter affidavits so far. Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh

t ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 04/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.K. Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks whereafter no further extension shall be given. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents. List again on 21.1.2016.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu Grover (M V RAMESH)Date: 2015.11.0415:59:57 SCTReason: Registrar MG

ITEM NO.83 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 18/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 4,29,31-32,37 and 48 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served . List again on 4.11.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

SECTION IV B                 Listed on 18.08.2015              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   Court No. R­2             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     Item No.   83 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 30599 OF 2014        WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF State of Punjab & Ors.             ...Petitioner(s)          Versus  Umesh Kumar Singh & Ors.             ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 29.04.2015 when the following order was passed :­    “Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 4. The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List again on 18.08.2015.” It is submitted that  there are total 48 respondents. Show Cause Notice was issued by Registered A.D. Post on 28.02.2015. A.D. card received from respondent No. 30 but no on has entered appearance. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5 to 17 are represented through Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 18­28, 33­36, 38­47 are represented through Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. But both the Advocates have not filed counter affidavits so far. Neither A.D. Cards nor unserved cover containing notice has been received back from Respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48 so far.

Service of show cause notice is not complete on respondent Nos. 4, 29, 31­32, 37 and 48. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 17th day of August, 2015.      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocate. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta, Advocate. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Advocate.     ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh

0 ITEM NO.83 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 18/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 4,29,31-32,37 and 48 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.Signature Not Verified List again on 4.11.2015.Digitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.08.1916:37:01 SCTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.79 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 29/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.4. The served respondents shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List again on 18.08.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 19/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the spare copies after the prescribed period. The delay in filing the spare copy of the SLP has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld. counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned and accordingly notice shall be issued to the respondents with utmost dispatch. List again on 29.4.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.89 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 19/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Neeraj Sharma,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the spare copies after the prescribed period. The delay in filing the spare copy of the SLP has been satisfactorily explained by the Ld. counsel. Therefore, the same is condoned and accordingly notice shall be issued to the respondents with utmost dispatch. List again on 29.4.2015.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.02.2016:46:10 ISTReason: (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.149 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30599/2014 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 08/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Mahalik,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks and is given one weeks time to comply with the terms of the office report. List again on 19.2.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8583/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013 in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 17/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,AG, Pb. Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG, Pb. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP as well as on the special leave petition. The contempt proceedings shall remain stayed, in the meantime. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

º ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8583/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/01/2013 in CWP No. 649/2013 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UMESH KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 17/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Aggarwal,AG, Pb. Mr. Sanchar Anand,AAG, Pb. Mr. Piyush Hans,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing SLP as well as on the special leave petition. The contempt proceedings shall remain stayed, in the meantime. [O.P. SHARMA]Signature Not Verified [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTERDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2014.10.17 COURT MASTER16:39:32 ISTReason: