IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8189 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.12401 of 2010) SULAKSHNA SHARMA & ANR. .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in First Appeal No.3965 of 2008, dated 11.08.2009. 3. The appellants/claimants are the family members of deceased who met with an accident and succumbed to his injuries. On the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, “the Tribunal”) had awarded a compensation of Rs.14,35,692/- along with 1
interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the date of filing of the petition. 4. Being aggrieved by the award so passed by the Tribunal, the appellants/claimants preferred appeal before the High Court. The High Court by the impugned judgment and order had dismissed the appeal of the appellants/claimants. Aggrieved by the order so passed by the High Court the appellants/claimants are before us in this Civil Appeal. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis . 6. After carefully going through the judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Tribunal as well as the High Court and keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal be further enhanced by another sum of Rs.6,00,000/-. 7. Accordingly, while allowing this appeal we modify the judgment and order passed by the High 2
Court. The appellants/claimants are now entitled for an enhanced amount of Rs.6,00,000/- over and above the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, with an interest at the rate of 6 per cent on the enhanced amount from the date of order passed by the High Court. The compensation so enhanced by us shall be paid after deducting the amount already paid, if any. 8. The Civil Appeal is disposed of accordingly. ..............CJI. [ H.L. DATTU ] ................J. [ ARUN MISHRA ] NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 3
ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008,11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) SULAKSHNA SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date :30/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A.K. Raina, Adv. for Dr. Dailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. (NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. As a sequel to above order, all pending applications, if any, are disposed of. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]
SECTION IVB Listed on.30.09.2015 Court No. 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 3 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 12401 OF 2010 Nidesh Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioner(s) Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.04.2010, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Delay condoned. Issue notice.” Accordingly show cause notice by courier was issued on 27.04.2010. It is submitted that there are total six respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 6 have been deleted from the Array of parties pursuant to order dated 12.08.2013 of the hon'ble Chamber Judge. Mr. Y.P. Dhingra, Advocate has filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 & 4 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. Respondent No. 5 has been served by Registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 & 4, but he has not taken 'No Objection' from erstwhile Advocate Mr. Y.P. Dhingra. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned was lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 28.08.2015, when the following order was passed:-
“The respondent Nos. 2 & 4 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No. 5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent Nos. 1,3 & 6 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 12.08.2013 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn.” The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 15th day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to :- Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv. Mr. Y.P Dhingra, Adv. 5/Bajaj ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\224$ 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8189 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.12401 of 2010) SULAKSHNA SHARMA & ANR. .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & .. RESPONDENT(S) ORS. O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in First Appeal No.3965 of 2008, dated 11.08.2009. 3. The appellants/claimants are the family members of deceased who met with an accident and succumbed to his injuries. On the claim petition filed by the appellants/claimants the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, "the Tribunal") hadSignature Not Verified awarded a compensation of Rs.14,35,692/- along withDigitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.10.0711:14:04 ISTReason: 2interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum fromthe date of filing of the petition.4. Being aggrieved by the award so passed by theTribunal, the appellants/claimants preferred appealbefore the High Court. The High Court by the impugnedjudgment and order had dismissed the appeal of theappellants/claimants. Aggrieved by the order sopassed by the High Court the appellants/claimants are
before us in this Civil Appeal.5. Heard learned counsel for the parties to thelis.6. After carefully going through the judgment(s)and order(s) passed by the Tribunal as well as theHigh Court and keeping in view the peculiar facts andcircumstances of the case, we are of the opinionthat the compensation awarded by the Tribunal befurther enhanced by another sum of Rs.6,00,000/-.7. Accordingly, while allowing this appeal wemodify the judgment and order passed by the High 3Court. The appellants/claimants are now entitled foran enhanced amount of Rs.6,00,000/- over and abovethe compensation awarded by the Tribunal, with aninterest at the rate of 6 per cent on the enhancedamount from the date of order passed by the HighCourt. The compensation so enhanced by us shall bepaid after deducting the amount already paid, if any.8. The Civil Appeal is disposed of accordingly. ..............CJI. [ H.L. DATTU ] ................J. [ ARUN MISHRA ]NEW DELHI;SEPTEMBER 30, 2015ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008,11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)SULAKSHNA SHARMA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUSUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date :30/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. A.K. Raina, Adv. for Dr. Dailash Chand, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. (NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. As a sequel to above order, all pending applications, if any, are disposed of. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Vinod Kulvi ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Asstt. Registrar [ Signed order is placed on the file ]
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010 NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rohit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2 & 4 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent Nos.1,3 & 6 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 12.08.2013 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
SECTION IV B Listed on 28.08.2015 Court No. R2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 7 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 12401 OF 2010 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Nidesh Sharma & Ors. ....Petitioner(s) Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court(In Chamber) on 16.02.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order : “This is an application to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 on record. However, it is stated that legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 are already on record as petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. In view of the above, there is no need to pass any order on the application for substitution and only the name of petitioner No. 1 requires to be deleted from the array of parties. Ordered accordingly.” It is submitted that there are total six respondents in the instant matter. Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 6 have been deleted from the Array of parties pursuant to order dated 12.08.2013 of the Hon'ble Chamber Judge. Mr. Y. P. Dhingra, Advocate has filed counter affidavit so far. Respondent No. 5 has been served by Registered A.D. Post but no one has entered appearance so far. Service of show cause notice is complete.
It is further submitted that Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/memo of appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 & 4, but he has not taken 'No Objection' from erstwhile Advocate Mr. Y. P. Dhingra. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report. Dated this the 26th day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to : Mr. Abhijat P. Medh , Advocate. Mr. Y. P. Dhingra, Advocate. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Rajesh
ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010 NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) Date : 28/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Rohit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.2 & 4 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.5, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. The respondent Nos.1,3 & 6 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 12.08.2013 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.08.3111:19:44 TLTReason:
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014, I.A. 6/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008,passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln.) Date : 16/02/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 on record. However, it is stated that legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 are already on record as petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. In view of the above, there is no need to pass any order on the application for substitution and only the name of petitioner No. 1 requires to be deleted from the array of parties. Ordered accordingly. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Minakshi Mehta ] Court Master Court Master
¦ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.15 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5/2014, I.A. 6/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12401/2010 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008,passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s) (For substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln.) Date : 16/02/2015 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R This is an application to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 on record. However, it is stated that legal heirs of deceased petitioner No. 1 are already on record as petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. In view of the above, there is no need to pass any order on the application for substitution and only the name of petitioner No. 1 requires to beSignature Not Verified deleted from the array of parties.Digitally signed byCharanjeet KaurDate: 2015.02.1817:44:54 IST Ordered accordingly.Reason: [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Minakshi Mehta ] Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.79 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010(From the judgement and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No.3965/2008 of theHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 29/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr.Amarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.(NP)For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravi Bakshi, Adv for Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are told that petitioner no.1 has died. Learned counsel for thepetitioner is granted four week's time to make an appropriate applicationfor bringing on record the LRs of the deceased petitioner no.1. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar
Ð ITEM NO. 9 COURT NO.4 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. No. 2 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No.3965/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH) NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS KULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (Appln(s) for deletion of names of respondents 1,3, and 6 from array of parties) Date: 12/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for deleting the names of respondents Nos. 1,3 and 6 is allowed at the risk of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Amended memo of parties name shall be filed within two weeks. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] ||Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |
\222ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 09/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amarjeet Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for deletion of the respondents may be processed. List the matter on 3.12.2012.| | |(SUNIL THOMAS) ||s | |Registrar |
VITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 30/08/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 6. List the matter on 9.10.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
>ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 16/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 6. List the matter on 30.08.2012.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB
ÜITEM NO.16 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010(From the judgement and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No.3965/2008of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(Office Report on default)Date: 18/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA (In chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay in filing the spare copies, process fee and proof of cost of Rs.500/- is condoned. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
ÒITEM NO.10 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 13/10/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner who was granted last opportunity for remitting the process fee and spare copy, has not taken steps even now. However, I am inclined to grant three more weeks time subject to the condition that he remits the process fee and spare copy and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within three weeks. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non- prosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. List the matter on 15.11.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
,ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 09/09/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioners granted two weeks time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. If steps taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. List the matter on 13.10.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 29/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent Nos. 1,3,5 and 6. List the matter on 03.05.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS) RegistrarKKJ
àITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 25/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner seeks a week's time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. Granted. If steps taken, issue notice thereafter. Await return of notice of respondent No. 1, 3, 5 and 6. List the matter on 25.2.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
àITEM NO.51 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 25/01/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counsel for the petitioner seeks a week's time as a last chance for remitting process fee and spare copy of the pleadings. Granted. If steps taken, issue notice thereafter. Await return of notice of respondent No. 1, 3, 5 and 6. List the matter on 25.2.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
ÆITEM NO.49 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 13/12/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of Respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 & 6. It is seen that notice was issued long back by courier service. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps by registered post acknowledgment due within four weeks as a last chance. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. List the matter on 25.01.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.80 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 28/10/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No. 1, 3, 5 and 6. List the matter on 13.12.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
¾ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 08/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is seen that Respondent Nos. 2 & 4 have filed vakalatnamaand counter affidavit. By mistake, in the last Order dated30.7.2010, it has been noted as Respondent Nos.2-4. Hence awaitreturn of notice of Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 6. List the matter on 28.10.2010. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\222ITEM NO.55 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).12401/2010NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)Date: 30/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent 2 to 4 have filed Vakalatnma and counter affidavit. Await return of notice of respondent No. 1, 5 and 6. List the matter on 8.9.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
8ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)...CC 5637/2010(From the judgment and order dated 11/08/2009 in FAO No. 3965/2008of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)NIDESH SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSKULWINDER SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 16/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. (S. Thapar) (Vijay Dhawan) P.S. to Registrar Assistant Registrar