Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2014 / Diary 10260

UNION OF INDIA . v. EX. SEP. NARENDER SINGH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10260/2014

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

01-08-2014

Bench

Petitioner

UNION OF INDIA .

Respondent

EX. SEP. NARENDER SINGH

Primary Holding

Leave to appeal under Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 may be declined both on grounds of limitation and on merits when no substantial question of law of general or public importance is raised.

Download PDF Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S). OF 2014 (D. No.10260 of 2014) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS EX. SEP. NARENDER SINGH Respondent(s) O R D E R Apart from the fact that there is a delay of 1151 days in the filing of this application for leave to appeal we do not see any substantial question of law of general/public importance arising for our consideration. The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation and also on merit. .......................J (T.S. THAKUR) .......................J (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) NEW DELHI DATED 01st August, 2014Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMahabir SinghDate: 2014.08.0415:35:06 ISTReason:ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal D. No(s). 10260/2014UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUSEX. SEP. NARENDER SINGH Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed ForcesTribunal Act, 2007 and office report)

Date : 01/08/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELFor Appellant(s) Mr. P.S. Narasimha,ASG Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Apart from the fact that there is a delay of 1151 days in thefiling of this application for leave to appeal we do not see anysubstantial question of law of general/public importance arisingfor our consideration. The prayer for leave to appeal is accordingly declined andthe application for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground oflimitation and also on merit.(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India