Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2015 / Diary 10243

BHAGYASHREE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10243/2015

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

06-04-2015

Bench

Petitioner

BHAGYASHREE

Respondent

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.15 & 72 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2508/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/03/2015 in CRLA No. 28/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) MITHILA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 2548/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) SLP(Crl) No. 2588/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) SLP(Crl) No. 2639/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 06/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Basant,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shyam Dewani,Adv. Mr. Gagan Sanghi,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. In SLP.2639/15 Mr. L.Nageswara Rao,Sr.Adv. Mr. Gagan Sanghi,Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. 1

For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain these special leave petitions, which are dismissed. However, if the petitioners surrender within four weeks from today and apply for regular bail, if so advised, the Trial Court shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass orders within one week thereafter. For the said period of four weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2

SECTION II­A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.)NO. 2639 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS. 5509 AND 5510 OF 2015 (Application for exemption from filing certified copy and official translation) SMT. BHAGYASHREE ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned has been filed by Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate on behalf of the Petitioner above named against the Judgment and Order dated 19 th  March, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Criminal Application (ABA) No. 29 of 2015. It is submitted that instant matter is tagged with Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2508 of 2015 as both are arising out of same FIR. T he matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. DATED this the 6 th  day of April, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­  Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C3/pa

SECTION II­A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.)NOS. 2548 AND 2588 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NOS. 5368, 5369, 5421 AND 5422 OF 2015 (Applications for exemption from filing certified copy and official translation) SMT. MITHILA ETC. ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. ...RESPONDENT OFFICE REPORT These matters above­mentioned have been filed by Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate on behalf of the Petitioner above named against the Judgment and Order dated 19 th  March, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur in Criminal Application (ABA) Nos. 472 of 2014 and 592 of 2014. It is submitted that  both the aforesaid matters are tagged with Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 2508 of 2015 as all of these are arising out of common order. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. DATED this the 4 th  day of April, 2015.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­  Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C3/pa

, ITEM NO.15 & 72 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2508/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/03/2015 in CRLA No. 28/2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur) MITHILA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 2548/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) SLP(Crl) No. 2588/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) SLP(Crl) No. 2639/2015 (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief) Date : 06/04/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. R. Basant,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shyam Dewani,Adv. Mr. Gagan Sanghi,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. In SLP.2639/15Signature Not Verified Mr. L.Nageswara Rao,Sr.Adv.Digitally signed byNarendra PrasadDate: 2015.04.07 Mr. Gagan Sanghi,Adv.17:36:55 ISTReason: Mr. Pankaj Kapoor,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. 1For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We are not inclined to entertain these special leavepetitions, which are dismissed. However, if the petitioners surrender within four weeks from

today and apply for regular bail, if so advised, the Trial Courtshall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance withlaw and pass orders within one week thereafter. For the said period of four weeks, no coercive action shall betaken against the petitioners. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (SHARDA KAPOOR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India