ITEM NO.96 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.13465-13466/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015 in WPC Nos. 6291/2015 and 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH W.P.(C) D 19946/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19947/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19943/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee) W.P.(C) D 19944/2016 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19945/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and appln.(s) for directions) Date : 12/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar,Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv. 1
For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh,ASG Mr. R.K. Rathore,Adv. Mr. R.Bala,Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli,Adv. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu,Adv. Mr. Ananga Mishra,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)Nos.13465-13466/2016 We have heard Mr.Suhaas Ratna Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sanjay Tyagi, learned counsel for the Veterinary Council of India (VCI). Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend in pursuance of the permission by the VCI, students had taken admission and have completed the course and entered into Masters. The issue now pertains to grant of degrees. He has drawn our attention to the order passed by us in SLP(C)No.5537 of 2014 (Vikas Verma vs. Rajasthan University of Cet. & An.Sc. & Ors.). The said order is as follows: “ Though many an issue was raised by the petitioner in course of hearing, he restricted to a singular prayer, that is, as he has appeared in the university examination conducted by the first respondent and become successful, his degree should be accepted inasmuch as he had taken admission in Aravali Vaterninary College, Sikar, respondent no.3 herein, when the college was recognised by the VCI. 2
There is no cavil over the fact that there was a conditional recognition for one year at the time of admission of the present petitioner. Thus, the admission was valid. The prayer for migration to the other college has been negatived by the High Court. We have been apprised that the writ petition preferred by the College is pending before the High Court of Rajasthan. Regard being had to the same, we do not intend to express any opinion in that regard. However, we are of the view that the students who had taken admission keeping in view the conditional recommendation granted by the VCI and in view of the judgment passed in Apollo College of Vaterinary Medicine vs. Rajasthan State Veterinary Council & Ors. [(2015) 2 SCC 291)], we direct that the degrees obtained by the petitioner shall be treated as valid for all purposes. We hay hasten to add that our treating the degree of the petitioner as valid for all purposes would not extend any kind of enquiry in respect of the college, the third respondent herein.” Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we think the said order should be made applicable to the present petitions and accordingly, the special leave petitions stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order. There shall be no order as to costs. W.P.(C)D 19946/2016,19947/2016,19943/2016,19944/2016 and 19945/2016 Let these writ petitions be listed on 17 th August, 3
2016. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall pay the deficit court fee by then. (Anita Malhotra) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Court Master 4
´, ITEM NO.96 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.13465-13466/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015 in WPC Nos. 6291/2015 and 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH W.P.(C) D 19946/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19947/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19943/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee) W.P.(C) D 19944/2016 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for directions and appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19945/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and appln.(s) for directions) Date : 12/08/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar,Adv.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byANITA MALHOTRADate: 2016.08.17 Mr. Bharat Bhushan,Adv.16:08:42 ISTReason: 1For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh,ASG Mr. R.K. Rathore,Adv. Mr. R.Bala,Adv. Mr. Nalin Kohli,Adv. Mr. Akshay Amritanshu,Adv. Mr. Ananga Mishra,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)Nos.13465-13466/2016 We have heard Mr.Suhaas Ratna Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Sanjay Tyagi, learned counsel for the Veterinary Council of India (VCI). Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend in pursuance of the permission by the VCI, students had taken admission and have completed the course and entered into Masters. The issue now pertains to grant of degrees. He has drawn our attention to the order passed by us in SLP(C)No.5537 of 2014 (Vikas Verma vs. Rajasthan University of Cet. & An.Sc. & Ors.). The said order is as follows: "Though many an issue was raised by the petitioner in course of hearing, he restricted to a singular prayer, that is, as he has appeared in the university examination conducted by the first respondent and become successful, his degree should be accepted inasmuch as he had taken admission in Aravali Vaterninary College, Sikar, respondent no.3 herein, when the college was recognised by the VCI. 2 There is no cavil over the fact that there was a conditional recognition for one year at the time of admission of the present petitioner. Thus, the admission was valid. The prayer for migration to the other college has been negatived by the High Court. We have been apprised that the writ petition preferred by the College is pending before the High Court of Rajasthan. Regard being had to the same, we do not intend to express any opinion in that regard. However, we are of the view that the students who had taken admission keeping in view the conditional recommendation granted by the VCI and in view of the judgment passed in Apollo College of Vaterinary Medicine vs. Rajasthan State Veterinary Council & Ors. [(2015) 2 SCC 291)], we direct that the degrees obtained by the petitioner shall be treated as valid for all purposes. We hay hasten to add that our treating the degree of the petitioner as valid for all purposes would not extend any kind of enquiry in respect of the college, the third respondent herein." Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we
think the said order should be made applicable to thepresent petitions and accordingly, the special leavepetitions stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaidorder. There shall be no order as to costs.W.P.(C)D 19946/2016,19947/2016,19943/2016,19944/2016 and19945/2016 Let these writ petitions be listed on 17th August, 32016. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall pay thedeficit court fee by then.(Anita Malhotra) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Court Master 4
1 ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015 in WPC No. 6291/2015 27/08/2015 in WPC No. 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH W.P.(C) D 19946/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19947/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and impleadment and directions and exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19943/2016 (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19944/2016 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and directions and exemption from paying court fee and Office Report) W.P.(C) D 19945/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee anddirections and Office Report) Date : 29/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, AOR
2 For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR Mr. Praveen H. Parekh, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. lal Raj, Adv. Mr. .K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Maroria, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter on 1.08.2016. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master
1ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015in WPC No. 6291/2015 27/08/2015 in WPC No. 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)WITHW.P.(C) D 19946/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee and OfficeReport)W.P.(C) D 19947/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and impleadment and directions andexemption from paying court fee and Office Report)W.P.(C) D 19943/2016(With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from paying court feeand Office Report)W.P.(C) D 19944/2016(With appln.(s) for impleadment and directions and exemption frompaying court fee and Office Report)W.P.(C) D 19945/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from paying court fee anddirectionsand Office Report)Date : 29/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, AOR2For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AORMr. Praveen H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.Mr. K. lal Raj, Adv.Mr. .K. Rathore, Adv.Mr. Mukesh Maroria, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList the matter on 1.08.2016.(Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016 RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 28/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps to be taken by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner for service of all the respondents within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. List again on 30.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON: 28.07.2016 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO: 1 ITEM NO: 84 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 13465-13466 of 2016 RAHUL CHOUDHARY & ETC. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS ICAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 04.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Await service of all the respondents. List again on 28.07.2016.” It is submitted that Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received from all the respondents so far. Service is not complete. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 27 th DAY OF JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-1
ITEM NO.84 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 28/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFresh steps to be taken by the Ld. Counsel for thepetitioner for service of all the respondents within twoweeks. Notice thereafter be issued.List again on 30.9.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016 RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of all the respondents. List again on 28.7.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar
LISTED ON: 04.07.2016 BEFORE COURT NO: 1 ITEM NO: 96 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 13465-13466 of 2016 RAHUL CHOUDHARY & ANR. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS ICAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on 02.05.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable within eight weeks.” It is submitted that as directed above show cause notice to all three respondents was issued on 14.05.2016 by registered A.D. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover in respect of all the respondents has been received so far. The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-1
j ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13465-13466/2016 RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of all the respondents. List again on 28.7.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySONALI SAUNDDate: 2016.07.0417:31:00 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2016 CC Nos. 8002-8003/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015 in WPC No. 6291/2015, WPC No. 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kr. Matwa, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnabfle within eight weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ H.S. Parasher ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master
LISTED ON: 02.05.2016 BEFORE COURT NO: 4 ITEM NO: 41 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CC NOS. 8002-03/2016 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. /2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1-2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) RAHUL CHOUDHARY & ANR. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS ICAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 27.08.2015 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition(C) No. 6291 & 6292 of 2015 alongwith applications for condonation of delay in filing SLP (barred by time by 114 days) and the same has been included in SLP paper books. It is further submitted that SLP(C) No. 5537/2014 referred to on page ‘M’ of list of dates was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 12.01.2016, when the Court was pleased to dispose of the same. Copy of order dated 12.01.2016 is enclosed herewith. The matter alongwith applications above-mentioned is listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 29 th DAY OF APRIL, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR p-1
ò ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......of 2016 CC Nos. 8002-8003/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27/08/2015 in WPC No. 6291/2015, WPC No. 6292/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi) RAHUL CHOUDHARY ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ICAR AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 02/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rakesh Kr. Matwa, Adv. Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice returnabfle within eight weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ H.S. Parasher ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by USHARANI BHARDWAJDate: 2016.05.0410:42:45 ISTReason: