¦ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/01/2013 in WPCRLNo.1563/2009, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay, and office report)Date: 21/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil K Mittal, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Kshitiz, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Adv. Ms. Richa Narang, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Antil, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. Suvarka Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Rishab, Adv. Mr. Asheem Swaroop, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Dismissed. However, we direct the Trial Judge to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible, provided all the parties cooperate in the trial. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Suneet Mahajan ] Court Master Court Master
\226ITEM NO.53 COURT NO.3 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/01/2013 in WPCRL No.1563/2009 of theHIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI)SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 06/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. L.N. Rao,ASG Mr. Anil Antil,Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat,Adv. Mr. N. Pasha,Adv. for Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Gagan Chhabra,Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Naresh Gaur,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for both the parties would submit that there is every possibility of the lis being settled amicably between the parties. Therefore, they request us to refer the matter to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for amicable settlement of the dispute between both the parties. Accordingly, we direct both the parties to appear before the learned Coordinator of the Supreme Court Mediation Centre at 110, Lawyers' Chambers (R.K. Jain Block), Supreme Court Compound, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 on 10th February, 2014 at 10.30 A.M. The learned Coordinator will make all possible efforts to settle the dispute between the parties amicably and send his report to this Court within three weeks' time thereafter. Registry is directed to list this matter after the report from the Mediation Centre is received. Ordered accordingly. (A.S. BISHT) (VINOD KULVI) A.R.-CUM-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
ÎITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report )Date: 24/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Anshul Mittal, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr Gagan Chhabra, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Mr Tulsi Prasad Rastogi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavitdespite final chance granted on the last date. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.3 has been filed onrecord. The ld. Counsel for the petitioner has made a submission at Barthat the counter affidavit on record seems to have been filed by the Powerof Attorney of respondent No.3 but the copy of the same has not been servedon him. The ld. Counsel, Dr (Mrs) Vipin Gupta appearing on behalf ofrespondent No.3 has undertaken to rectify the omission within two weeks. Oncompliance, registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'bleCourt as per rules.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
BITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 19/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Anshul Mittal, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Gagan Chhabra, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Tashriq Ahmad, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Two weeks' time is granted, as a final chance, to respondent Nos.1and 2 for filing counter affidavit on record. It seems that counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.3 has beenfiled after the prayer came to be rejected on the last date. In theinterest of justice, the same is allowed to be taken on record subject tocost of Rs.1000/- to be deposited with the Supreme Court Legal Aid ServicesCommittee. The order be complied with in two weeks' time.Item No.77 -2- It would not be out of place to mention here that copy of the counteraffidavit has been already served on the other side. List again on 24.10.2013.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
¬ITEM NO.78 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay and office report)Date: 12/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Adv. Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Nandani Gupta, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. Gobind Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks' time for filingcounter affidavit on record. Respondent No.3 has failed to file counter affidavit within the timegranted by the Hon'ble Court vide its order dated 7.5.2013. Request forfurther grant of time is rejected. List again on 19.9.2013.| | | REGISTRAR || | | |rd
ÔITEM NO.14 COURT NO.5 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).3600/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/01/2013 in WPCRL No.1563/2009 ofthe HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)SURENDRA PAUL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE (NCT OF DELHI & ORS.) Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-parte stay)Date: 07/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHARFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Sunil Kr.Mittal, Adv. Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Adv. Mr.Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. for Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Gagan Chhabra, Adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Notice. Learned counsel for the respondent appears and accepts notice. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in four weeks' time. There shall be interim stay of the operation of the impugned judgmentand order until further orders. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Asstt.Registrar