STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. ARUN BABULAL PATIL

ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 266298/2025 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 266291/2025 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IA No. 264483/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 264481/2025 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 84416/2024 C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) SLP(C) No. 30150/2019 (IX) IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT Date : 16-02-2026 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. Ms. Chitransha Singh Sikarwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) :Ms. Aparna Bhat, Sr. Adv. Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Ms. Maulshree Pathak, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, Sr. Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, AOR Ms. Madhulika Mohta, Adv. Mr. Sudheer Voditel, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Vishal Agrawal, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Sachin Singh, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Pratik Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Shashank Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Parth Johri, Adv. Mr. Sanchit Agrahari, Adv. Mr. Madhur Duggal, Adv. Mr. B H Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh, AOR Mr. Avinish Kr Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Vishal Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Astha Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Await service of notice. 2. List on 16.03.2026. (RASHI GUPTA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.59 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) [ONLY IA NO. 84416/2024 IN CA NO. 6510/2016 LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM] WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 84416/2024 IA No. 84416/2024 - EARLY HEARING APPLICATION Date : 01-12-2025 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA For Appellant(s) : Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. Ms. Chitransha Singh Sikarwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, AOR Mr. Sudheer Voditel, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.6510/2016 : 1. IA No.84416/2024 is allowed. 2. Hearing is fixed on 16.02.2026 by which time the appellant (s) shall ensure that service of notice is complete on all the respondents as otherwise the matter would be heard on merits. (NEHA GUPTA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.803 COURT NO.15 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) [ONLY IA NO. 84416/2024 IN CA NO. 6510/2016 TO BE LISTED] WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 84416/2024 Date : 16-10-2025 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA For Appellant(s) : Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aparna Bhat, Sr. Adv. Mr. David A., Adv. Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Banju, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the application for early hearing in the first week of December, 2025. (RASHI GUPTA) (AVGV RAMU) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.11 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30150/2019 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2019 in WP No. 3969/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay] THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT Date : 12-02-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) :Mr. B H Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh, AOR Mr. Avinish Kr Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List alongwith Civil Appeal Nos.4008-4009/2014. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. No. 6510/201 is listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) Date : 05-08-2024 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6510/2016 Ld. counsel for the respondents submits that respondent No.60 has expired. Submission is taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks’ time to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent Nos.1,52, 57 and 60. List again on 23.9.2024. SUJATA SINGH Registrar rd

1 ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 30150/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2019 in WP No. 3969/2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay) THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 21-05-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Deepak Sain, Adv. Ms. Nisha, Adv. Mr.Mrigank P., Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 27 states that the earlier Advocate-on-Record has already expired and he is appearing for the said Respondents and seeks time to file `Vakalatnama’ and counter affidavit. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.28 seeks permission to file counter affidavit.

2 3. List the matter after eight weeks. (VISHAL ANAND) (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.5 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PRADIP Y. LADEKAR Civil Appeal No(s). 4008 - 4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. Nos. 6967 - 68, 6510, 6637 - 38 and 6970 - 71 of 2016 listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6967 - 6968/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637 - 6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970 - 6971/2016 (III) Date : 02 - 05 - 2024 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Mr. Abhinav N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Gajanan N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv.

- 2 - Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Manoj Ranjatn Sinha, Adv. Mr. Deepak Sain, Adv. Ms. Nisha, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos. 6967 - 6968/2016 Appeal in respect of respondent nos.7, 304, 581,582, 584, 593 and 679 has been dismissed vide order dated 03.02.2020 passed by Hon’ble Judge - in - Chambers. Appeal in respect of respondent nos.27, 31, 56,70,86, 95, 125, 186, 195, 203, 262, 327, 422, 453, 560, 575, 599, 610, 634 and 655 has been dismissed vide order dated 20.03.2023 passed by Hon’ble Judge - in - Chambers. Service is complete in respect of other respondents. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon’ble Court, as per rules. C.A. No. 6510/2016 Appeal in respect of respondent nos.21 and 63 has been dismissed vide order dated 03.02.2020 passed by Hon’ble Judge - in - Chambers. Four weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for petitioner to file application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent nos.1, 52 and 57. List again on 05.08.2024. C.A. Nos. 6637 - 6638/2016 Appeal in respect of respondent no.72 has been dismissed vide order dated 03.02.2020 passed by Hon’ble Judge - in - Chambers. Service is complete in respect of other respondents. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon’ble Court, as per rules. - 3 -

C.A. Nos. 6970 - 6971/2016 Appeal in respect of respondent nos.23, 25, 88 and 155 has been dismissed vide order dated 20.03.2023 passed by Hon’ble Judge - in - Chambers. Service is complete in respect of other respondents. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon’ble Court, as per rules. PRADIP Y. LADEKAR Registrar

ITEM NO.1719 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) Date : 06-10-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Yuvraj Gaikwad, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 : In view of the order dated 20.03.2023 passed by Hon’ble Judge in Chambers, the office may proceed with the same. (SWETA BALODI) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

1 ITEM NO.1706 COURT NO.3 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) Date : 28-08-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Mr. Abhinav N Tirthkar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Gajanan N Tirthakar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chouhan, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv.

2 Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after four weeks. (INDU MARWAH) (PREETHI T.C.) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

1 ITEM NO.1717 COURT NO.6 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) Date : 20-03-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Omkar Deshpande, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR

2 UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Omkar Deshpande, learned counsel, appears for the State of Maharashtra, and seeks some more time to take necessary steps in relation to the 21 deceased respondents, whose numbers find mention in the office report dated 24.01.2023. Ms. Aparna Bhat, learned counsel, appears for some of the respondents in Civil Appeal No.6510/2016, and states that though service is complete in the appeal in which she is appearing, the matter is held up as it is linked to the other appeals wherein service is yet to be completed. She would point out that these matters, pertaining to the year 2016, relate to pay fixation of the respondents and the failure on the part of the State in taking necessary steps with regard to service of notice is delaying the adjudication of the cases on merits. In that view of the matter, given the fact that all the appeals are of the year 2016, one last opportunity is granted to the State to do the needful, not only in relation to the 21 identified deceased respondents, but also other respondents who may expire before the next date of hearing,

3 within the knowledge of the appellant(s). In the event, necessary measures are not taken by the next date of hearing, the civil appeals shall stand dismissed against the already identified deceased respondents. List after eight weeks. (NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (NAND KISHORE) COURT MASTER

1 ITEM NO.1713 COURT NO.17 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) Date : 24-02-2023 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Omkar Deshpande, Adv. Mr. Siddharath Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Abhayendra Kumar Rai, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Satyajit A Desai, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Adv. Mr. Vijay Raj Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Abhinav K. Mutyalwar, Adv. Mr. Gajanan N Tirthkar, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Mr. Sudheer Voditel, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

2 Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, list the matter after three weeks. (ASHIMA CHHABRA) (NIDHI BHARDWAJ) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.22 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. ANJU BAJAJ CHANDNA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30150/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 28-09-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. K. N. Rai, AOR Appearance Petitioner-Mr Yuvraj Gaikwad, Adv. Respondent No.28-Mr Mohd. Shahbuddin, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 27 have filed counter affidavits. Service is complete on respondent no. 29 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Service is complete on respondent no.28. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within four weeks' time as final opportunity. At the end of the period aforesaid, whether counter affidavit is filed or not, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. ANJU BAJAJ CHANDNA Registrar

ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. AVANI PAL SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30150/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 24-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr Aaditya A Pande, Adv. Mr Geo Joseph, Adv. Ms Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr Durgesh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. N. Rai, AOR UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent nos. 1 to 27 have filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent nos. 28 and 29 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld. counsel, Mr Manoj R Sinha appearing on behalf of Mr Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate-on-record undertakes to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.28 and prays for time in that regard. Undertaking is accepted and time of four weeks is granted for doing the needful. List on 28.9.2022. AVANI PAL SINGH Registrar

ITEM NO.12 Court 13 (Video Conferencing) SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 17-02-2021 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR ….2/-

- 2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 As requested, four weeks’ time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellants to do the needful. (RAJNI MUKHI) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30150/2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 187190/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILIN G C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 04 - 02 - 2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.14 and 27 are yet not served and the remaining respondents are duly served. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Sushil Karanjkar, appearing on behalf of Mr. K.N. Rai, Advocate - on - re cord appears for respondent Nos.1 to 27. He seeks time to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks. List again on 9.4.2020. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4008-4009 OF 2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. Nos. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 O R D E R C.A. Nos. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 Final opportunity is granted to serve the respondent no. 21, Dasti, in addition too, subject to filing the affidavit of service Similarly, steps to be taken to bring on record LRs. of deceased respondent no. 63 within four weeks, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed against said respondent. In other appeals also four weeks’ time is granted to the appellant to file application for substitution of the deceased respondents. In the event of non-compliance the appeals shall stand dismissed against the said respondents without further reference to the Court. ……………………………………………………………………………J [S. RAVINDRA BHAT] NEW DELHI, DATED:3.2.2020

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.11 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 03-02-2020 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT [IN CHAMBER] For Appellant(s) Mr. S. Sai Bandaru, Adv Mr. Sachin Patil, Adv Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv Mr. Aaditya A Pande, Adv Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Final opportunity is granted to serve the respondent no. 21, Dasti, in addition too, subject to filing the affidavit of ..2/-

.2.. service. Similarly, steps to be taken to bring on record LRs. of deceased respondent no. 63 within four weeks, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed against said respondent. In other appeals also four weeks’ time is granted to the appellant to file application for substitution of the deceased respondents. In the event of non-compliance the appeals shall stand dismissed against the said respondents without further reference to the Court. (MANASWINI DEVI SHARMA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER (Signed Order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 37124/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2019 in WP No. 3969/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay) THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SURVASE MAGAN PANDHARINATH & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and Interim Relief and IA No.187186/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.187190/2019-EXEMP.FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No.187187/2019-CONDON.OF DELAY IN REFILING/CURING THE DEFECTS) Date : 16-12-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Samrat Shinde,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. We have heard Mr. Samrat Shinde, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-State. Issue notice in the special leave petition as well as on the interim prayer for stay. (MAHABIR SINGH) (BEENA JOLLY) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Nos.4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 are to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 29-11-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Anshuman Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyajit Desai, Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Civil Appeal Nos.6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 Two weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellants to do the needful as per office report dated 16 th November, 2019. (RASHMI DHYANI) (K. RAMA KRISHNA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.4.1 to 4.4. 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 (Only C.A. Nos. 6510, 6967-6968, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 to be listed ) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 25-09-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 and 6970-6971/2016 In all the matters numbered above, Ld. Counsel for appellant has failed to comply with the terms of order dated 25.4.2019 in respect of unserved respondents and for deceased respondents

ITEM NO.4.1 to 4.4. 2 despite grant of last chance. Viewed thus, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List thereafter. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar MG

ITEM NO.19 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (Only C.A. 6967-6968, 6510, 6637-6638 & 6970-6971 of 2016 to be listed ) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 25-04-2019 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Shivangi Singh,Adv. Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6510/2016 L earned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks’ file fresh particulars of respondent No. 21 and he shall

ITEM NO.19 2 also take requisite steps for the service of notice upon him. Respondent No.63 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Four weeks’ time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 16.5.2018 of this Court . C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 Respondent No.72 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Four weeks’ time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 16.5.2018 of this Court . C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 L earned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks’ file fresh particulars of respondent No. 107 and he shall also take requisite steps for the service of notice upon him. Respondent Nos. 23, 25, 88, 155 and 157 are reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record their Lrs. Four weeks’ time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 16.5.2018 of this Court . C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 L earned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks’, file fresh particulars of Respondent Nos. 304,581,582,584 and 593 and he shall also take requisite steps for the service of

ITEM NO.19 3 notice upon them. Respondent Nos. 7,27,31,56,70,86,95,125,186,195,203,262,327, 422, 429,453, 560, 575,599,610,634,655,679 are reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks, file an application for substitution to bring on record their Lrs. Four weeks’ time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 16.5.2018 of this Court . List again on 25.9.2019. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar MG

Item No.46 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 6510/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (III) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (III) Date : 16-05-2018 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. T. Mahipal, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Ms. Raj Kumari Banju,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. Nos. 4008-4009/2014 Service is complete. Ld. Counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble

Item No.46 2 Court under the rules. C.A. No. 6510/2016 As per certificate of service respondent No.21 is Not found at the given address. Hence, learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of NLPA to him within the same period. Respondent No.63 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 As per certificate of service received from the High Court of Bombay respondent Nos. 23, 25,88,155 and 157 are reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record their Lrs. As per certificate of service respondent No.107 has been permanently shifted to Kolkata and her new address is not known Hence, learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of NLPA to him within the same period. C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 As per certificate of service received from the High Court of Bombay Respondent No.72 is expired. Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 As per certificate of service received from the High Court of Bombay respondent Nos.7,27,31,56,70,86,95,125,186,195,203,262,327, 422, 429,453,560,575,599,610,634, 655 and 679 are expired. Learned

Item No.46 3 counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record their Lrs. As per certificate of service respondent No. 304 has not been served as he gone to America, Respondent Nos. 581,582, 584 and 593 have been retired from services. Hence, learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of NLPA to them within the same period. List again on 7.8.2018. SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar MG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6510/2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant(s) is granted four weeks' time to comply with the order dated 16.12.2016, failing which, these Civil Appeals shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. ...................J. [ DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD ] NEW DELHI; APRIL 3 , 2017

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.6510/2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUS KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report on default) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT) Date : 03/04/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. Mr. Mayank Sapra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the appellant(s) is granted four weeks' time to comply with the order dated 16.12.2016, failing which, these Civil Appeals shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SHAKTI P. SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

PIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPEAL NO.6510/2016STATE OF MAHARASHTRA APPELLANT(S) VERSUSKASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS RESPONDENT(S)WITHC.A. No. 6967-6968/2016C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 O R D E RLearned counsel for the appellant(s) isgranted four weeks' time to comply with theorder dated 16.12.2016, failing which, theseCivil Appeals shall stand dismissed withoutfurther reference to the Court....................J. [ DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD ] NEW DELHI; APRIL 3 , 2017ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No.6510/2016STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUSKASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s)(office report on default)WITHC.A. No. 6967-6968/2016(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016(OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT)Date : 03/04/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. Mr. Mayank Sapra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RLearned counsel for the appellant(s) is granted fourweeks' time to comply with the order dated 16.12.2016,failing which, these Civil Appeals shall stand dismissedwithout further reference to the Court. (RASHMI DHYANI ) (SHAKTI P. SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER(Signed order is placed on the file)

LISTED ON: 02.02.2017 COURT NO:  ITEM NO:                                                           SECTION­IX      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION        CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 4008­09 of 2014, 6510, 6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ETC  ...APPELLANTS ­VERSUS­ ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. ETC           …RESPONDENTS      REVISED OFFICE REPORT    The Interlocutory Application Nos. 5­6 of 2016 (Application for stay) in C.A Nos. 4008­4009 of 2014 along with connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.07.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Delay condoned in all the SLPs. Leave granted in all the SLPs. The operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court shall remain stayed until further orders but we are informed that in one of the matter that is in Civil Appeal No.4008-4009/2014, since the orders of the High Court have been complied with by making necessary payments, therefore, we only observe that payment would be subject to the final result of the appeal. Having regard to the nature of the issue, its financial implications and having regard to the fact of its peculiar issue, we direct that all these appeals be listed for hearing in the third week of November, 2016 on a Non-Miscellaneous Day. In view of the fact that we have stayed the operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court in these matters, obviously the respondents would not be able to receive the money which they were found to be eligible by the High Court. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to observe that if in the event the State fails in these appeals, the State would make the payment of the amount due to the respondents under the impugned judgment with some reasonable interest as may be determined by this Court at the time of disposal of these appeals.

I.A.No.5-6/2016 in C.A. Nos.4008-4009/2014 stand disposed of.”        CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4008­09 of 2014 It is submitted that there are 12 common respondents in the matters above­mentioned. Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and 11 are represented through M/s. R.P Goyal and T. Mahipal, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 10 and 12 are served through High Court but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on their behalf so far. Counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case so far. Service is complete. CIVIL APPEAL NOs.  6510, 6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016 It is submitted that there are 92, 101, 693 and 163 respondents respectively in the matter above­mentioned. Service of some of the respondents is incomplete in the matters as Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar counsel for the appellants has not filed 78, 102, 694, 164 sets of spare copies of SLPs for issuance of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal in respect of unserved respondents in the matter above­mentioned. It is further submitted that the matters were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 07.10.2016 with this position when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No. 6510/2016 Respondent Nos.1 to 72 are duly represented. 78 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 102 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two

weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 694 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 164 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. List again on 12.12.2016.” It is submitted that in view of order dated 07.10.2016 Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the appellants instead of filing spare copies of SLP has on 16.11.2016  filed separate applications for exemption from filing spare copies of SLP in the appeals above­mentioned. The applications are registered as I.A No. 3 in C.A No. 6510 of 2016 and I.A Nos. 5­6 in C.A Nos.  6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016. And the matters were again listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 16.12.2016, when the Ld. Registrar was pleased to pass the following order: “Application for exemption from filing spare copies of petition in compliance with the previous order is considered but the prayer is disallowed. As such, last opportunity is granted for filing spare copies in terms of previous order within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. If copies are not filed within the given time period, Registry to process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions and if copies are filed, issue notice to the unserved respondents forthwith and in that case, list again in this court on 01.02.2017. ” It is lastly submitted that counsel for the appellants has not taken steps in compliance of order dated 16.12.2016 and office report for directions was listed before the Hon'ble Judge­in­chambers on 30.01.2017, when His Lordship was pleased to pass

the following order: “List these matters after eight weeks.” The  matters above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 01 st   day of February, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate   Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate   Mr. T. Mahipal, Advocate    Mr. R.P. Goyal, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUS KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s) (office report for directions) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (Office Report for directions) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (Office Report for directions) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (Office Report for directions) Date : 30/01/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS] For Appellant(s) Ms. Shubhada Phaltankar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List these matters after eight weeks. (SONALI SAUND) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

SECTION-IX CHAMBER MATTER IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6510, 6637- 6638, 6967-68 AND 6970-6971 OF 2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. … APPELLANTS - VS. - KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK & ORS. ETC. … RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTIONS Leave in the matters above-mentioned was granted by this Hon'ble Court on 15 th July, 2016. It is submitted that there are 92, 101, 693 and 163 respondents respectively in the matters above-mentioned. Service of some of the respondents is incomplete in the matters as Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, counsel for the appellants in the matters has not filed 78, 102, 694 and 164 sets of spare copies of SLPs respectively for issuance of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal in respect of unserved respondents in the matters abovementioned. AND the matters were time and again and lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 16 th December, 2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Application for exemption from filing spare copies of petition in compliance with the previous order is considered but the prayer is disallowed. As such, last opportunity is granted for filing spare copies in terms of previous order within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. If copies are not filed within the given time period, Registry to process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions and if copies are filed, issue notice to the unserved respondents forthwith and in that case, list again in this Court on 01.02.2017.” It is submitted that despite aforesaid Order dated 16.12.2016 of Ld. Registrar's Court, counsel for the appellants has not filed spare copies of SLP in the matters above-mentioned, hence notice of lodgment of petition of appeal could not be issued.

- 2 - Office report for directions for not complying with the Order dated 16 th December, 2016 is listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers for orders. DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. N.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ÔITEM NO.46 COURT NO.8 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCivil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUSKASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s)(office report for directions)WITHC.A. No. 6967-6968/2016(Office Report for directions) C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016(Office Report for directions) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016(Office Report for directions) Date : 30/01/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO [IN CHAMBERS]For Appellant(s) Ms. Shubhada Phaltankar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RList these matters after eight weeks. (SONALI SAUND) (CHANDER BALA) SR.P.A COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUS KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and exemption from filing process fee & spare copies and office report) WITH C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016, C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016, C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing process fee & spare copies and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr Prashant Kenjale, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mayank Sapra, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for exemption from filing spare copies of petition in compliance with the previous order is considered but the prayer is disallowed. As such, last opportunity is granted for filing spare copies in terms of previous order within two weeks' time and notice thereafter be issued. If copies are not filed within the given time period, Registry to process for listing before Hon'ble Judge-in-chambers for further directions and if copies are filed, issue notice to the unserved respondents forthwith and in that case, list again in this court on 01.02.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUSKASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and exemption from filing process fee & spare copies andoffice report)WITHC.A. No. 6967-6968/2016,C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016,C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing process fee & sparecopies and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugnedorder and Office Report) Date : 16/12/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr Prashant Kenjale, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mayank Sapra, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RApplication for exemption from filing spare copies of petitionin compliance with the previous order is considered but the prayeris disallowed. As such, last opportunity is granted for filingspare copies in terms of previous order within two weeks' time andnotice thereafter be issued. If copies are not filed within thegiven time period, Registry to process for listing before Hon'bleJudge-in-chambers for further directions and if copies are filed,issue notice to the unserved respondents forthwith and in thatcase, list again in this court on 01.02.2017. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

LISTED ON:  COURT NO:  ITEM NO:                                                           SECTION­IX      IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION        CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 4008­09 of 2014, 6510, 6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ETC  ...APPELLANTS ­VERSUS­ ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. ETC           …RESPONDENTS      OFFICE REPORT    The Interlocutory Application Nos. 5­6 of 2016 (Application for stay) in C.A Nos. 4008­4009 of 2014 along with connected matters was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.07.2016 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Delay condoned in all the SLPs. Leave granted in all the SLPs. The operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court shall remain stayed until further orders but we are informed that in one of the matter that is in Civil Appeal No.4008-4009/2014, since the orders of the High Court have been complied with by making necessary payments, therefore, we only observe that payment would be subject to the final result of the appeal. Having regard to the nature of the issue, its financial implications and having regard to the fact of its peculiar issue, we direct that all these appeals be listed for hearing in the third week of November, 2016 on a Non-Miscellaneous Day. In view of the fact that we have stayed the operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court in these matters, obviously the respondents would not be able to receive the money which they were found to be eligible by the High Court. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to observe that if in the event the State fails in these appeals, the State would make the payment of the amount due to the respondents under the impugned judgment with some reasonable interest as may be determined by this Court at the time of disposal of these appeals. I.A.No.5-6/2016 in C.A. Nos.4008-4009/2014 stand disposed of.”

CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4008­09 of 2014 It is submitted that there are 12 common respondents in the matters above­mentioned. Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and 11 are represented through M/s. R.P Goyal and T. Mahipal, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 10 and 12 are served through High Court but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on their behalf so far. Counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case so far. Service is complete. CIVIL APPEAL NOs.  6510, 6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016 It is submitted that there are 92, 101, 693 and 163 respondents respectively in the matter above­mentioned. Service of some of the respondents is incomplete in the matters as Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar counsel for the appellants has not filed 78, 102, 694, 164 sets of spare copies of SLPs for issuance of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal in respect of unserved respondents in the matter above­mentioned. It is further submitted that the matters were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 07.10.2016 with this position when the following order was passed: “ C.A. No. 6510/2016 Respondent Nos.1 to 72 are duly represented. 78 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 102 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 694 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.

C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 164 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. List again on 12.12.2016.” It is submitted that in view of order dated 07.10.2016 Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the appellants instead of filing spare copies of SLP has on 16.11.2016  filed separate applications for exemption from filing spare copies of SLP in the appeals above­mentioned. The applications are registered as I.A No. 3 in C.A No. 6510 of 2016 and I.A Nos. 5­6 in C.A Nos.  6637­38, 6967­68 and 6970­6971 of 2016 and placed with the appeal paper books. The  matters above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 25 th   day of November, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate   Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate   Mr. T. Mahipal, Advocate    Mr. R.P. Goyal, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Civil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUS KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and office report) WITH C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and Office Report) Date : 07/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Shubhada Phaltankar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Toshita Pai, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6510/2016 Respondent Nos.1 to 72 are duly represented. 78 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.

Item No.66 -2- C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016 102 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016 694 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016 164 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time. Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents. List again on 12.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

¶ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWALCivil Appeal No(s). 6510/2016STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Appellant(s) VERSUSKASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and office report)WITHC.A. No. 6637-6638/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned orderand Office Report) C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned orderand Office Report) C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned orderand Office Report) Date : 07/10/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Shubhada Phaltankar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Toshita Pai, Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RC.A. No. 6510/2016Respondent Nos.1 to 72 are duly represented.78 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of noticeof lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time.Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.Item No.66 -2-C.A. No. 6637-6638/2016102 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of noticeof lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time.Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.C.A. No. 6967-6968/2016694 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of noticeof lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time.Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.C.A. No. 6970-6971/2016164 more spare copies to be filed for issuance of noticeof lodgement of petition of appeal within two weeks' time.Notice thereafter be issued to the remaining respondents.List again on 12.12.2016. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

ITEM NO.2 + 19 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5-6/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) WITH SLP(C)....CC No.12311/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12614-12615/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12719-12720/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12732-12733/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 15/07/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,A.G. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Arupit Rai,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudheer voditel,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned in all the SLPs. Leave granted in all the SLPs. The operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court

shall remain stayed until further orders but we are informed that in one of the matter that is in Civil Appeal No.4008-4009/2014, since the orders of the High Court have been complied with by making necessary payments, therefore, we only observe that payment would be subject to the final result of the appeal. Having regard to the nature of the issue, its financial implications and having regard to the fact of its peculiar issue, we direct that all these appeals be listed for hearing in the third week of November, 2016 on a Non-Miscellaneous Day. In view of the fact that we have stayed the operation of the impugned judgments of the High Court in these matters, obviously the respondents would not be able to receive the money which they were found to be eligible by the High Court. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to observe that if in the event the State fails in these appeals, the State would make the payment of the amount due to the respondents under the impugned judgment with some reasonable interest as may be determined by this Court at the time of disposal of these appeals. I.A.No.5-6/2016 in C.A. Nos.4008-4009/2014 stand disposed of. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

LISTED ON :15.07.2016                                        BEFORE COURT NO.: 05                             ITEM NO.:  19                 SECTION­IX                    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) ..CC NO. 12311 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1­2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP) IN PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) ..CC NOS. 12614­12615 AND 12719­12720 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF STATE OF MAHARASHTRA    ...PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ KASAV RAMNATH PUNDALIK AND ORS                  ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT  PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) ..CC NO. 12311 OF 2016 I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 1447 days in filing the Special Leave Petition  filed against the Judgment and Order dated 13.04.2012 of the High Court of Bombay in WP No. 4475 of 2011 and the Special Leave Petition filed against the Judgment and Order dated 23.03.2016 of the High Court of Bombay in Review Petition (Stamp) No. 21218 of 2013 in WP No. 4475 of 2011 is within time. It is further submitted that Special Leave Petition (C) ..CC Nos. 4438­4439 of 2014 (CA Nos. 4008­4009 of 2014) arising out of similar issue was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24.03.2014 when the Court was pleased to grant leave and the same is pending before the Hon'ble Court (Copy of the order dated 24.03.2014 is enclosed herewith). PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) ..CC NOS. 12614­12615 OF 2016 I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 10 days and 1437 days in filing the Special Leave Petition  filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 23.03.2016 and 26.04.2012 of the High Court of Bombay in RP No. 19561 of 2013 and WP No. 1741 of 2012 respectively. ..2/­

­2­ It is further submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with SLP (C)  ..CC No. 12311 of 2016 as both are arising out  common followed judgment. PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) ..CC NOS. 12719­12720 OF 2016 I t  is   s ubmit te d  for the information of the Hon'ble Court that there is a delay of 1494 days and 10 days in filing the Special Leave Petition  filed against the Judgment and Orders dated 29.02.2012 and 23.03.2016 of the High Court of Bombay in WP No. 9218 of 2011 and RP No. 19641 of 2013 respectively. It is further submitted that the instant matter has been tagged with SLP (C)  ..CC No. 12311 of 2016 as both are arising out of  similar issu e. The matters above­ mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 14th day of July, 2016.                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate L            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

D ITEM NO.2 + 19 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5-6/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) WITH SLP(C)....CC No.12311/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12614-12615/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12719-12720/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(C)....CC No.12732-12733/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 15/07/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,A.G. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Arupit Rai,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudheer voditel,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RSignature Not Verified Delay condoned in all the SLPs.Digitally signed by OMPARKASH SHARMADate: 2016.07.1612:50:15 ISTReason: Leave granted in all the SLPs. The operation of the impugned judgments of the High Courtshall remain stayed until further orders but we are informed thatin one of the matter that is in Civil Appeal No.4008-4009/2014,since the orders of the High Court have been complied with bymaking necessary payments, therefore, we only observe that payment

would be subject to the final result of the appeal. Having regard to the nature of the issue, its financialimplications and having regard to the fact of its peculiar issue,we direct that all these appeals be listed for hearing in the thirdweek of November, 2016 on a Non-Miscellaneous Day. In view of the fact that we have stayed the operation ofthe impugned judgments of the High Court in these matters,obviously the respondents would not be able to receive the moneywhich they were found to be eligible by the High Court. Therefore,we deem it appropriate to observe that if in the event the Statefails in these appeals, the State would make the payment of theamount due to the respondents under the impugned judgment with somereasonable interest as may be determined by this Court at the timeof disposal of these appeals. I.A.No.5-6/2016 in C.A. Nos.4008-4009/2014 stand disposed of. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5-6/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,A.G. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anupam Mishra,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha ,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on Friday the 15 th July, 2016 alongwith connected matters, numbers of which shall be supplied by Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

F ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. 5-6/2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (for stay and office report) Date : 04/07/2016 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Appellant(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,A.G. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anupam Mishra,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha,Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List on Friday the 15th July, 2016 alongwith connected matters, numbers of which shall be supplied by Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner. [O.P. SHARMA] [RAJINDER KAUR] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by OMPARKASH SHARMADate: 2016.07.0416:48:58 ISTReason:

SECTION – IX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATTE JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5­6  (Application for stay) IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4008­4009 OF 2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.    ...APPELLANTS ­VERSUS­ ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The SLP..CC. (C) Nos. 4438­4439 of 2014 were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 24 th  March, 2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order : “Delay condoned. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9. Issue notice to other respondents. Leave granted. If the respondents have any other claim, they may agitate the issue before the appropriate forum and it has nothing to do with the pendency of these cases.” It is submitted that there are 12 common respondents in the matter above mentioned. Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 and 11 are represented through M/s. R.P. Goyal and T. Mahipal, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 10 and 12 are served through High Court but no one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on their behalf so far. It is lastly submitted that Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the appellant has filed applications for stay and the same have been registered as Interlocutary Application Nos. 5­6 of 2016 and placed with appeal paper books. It is further submitted that counsel for both the parties have not filed statement of case under Rule as per Order XIX Rule 32 (2) of Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Service is complete. The applications above­mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report.  Dated this the 25 th  day of February, 2016.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR  Copy to: Mr. A.P. Mayee, Advocate  Mr. R.P. Goyal, Advocate Mr. T. Mahipal, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.118 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 24/04/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Among 12 respondents herein, service of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal is complete for all the respondents. None of the parties has filed the statement of case. Since, after the amendment in Supreme Court Rules, 2013, it is no more a mandate, the appeals herein stand complete. Appellant has also filed an application for stay but the copy thereof has not been served. The matter be processed for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, however, with the specific mention about the said application in the office report. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.118 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Civil Appeal No(s). 4008-4009/2014 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS ARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 24/04/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Among 12 respondents herein, service of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal is complete for all the respondents. None of the parties has filed the statement of case. Since, after the amendment in Supreme Court Rules, 2013, it is no more a mandate, the appeals herein stand complete. Appellant has also filed an application for stay but the copy thereof has not been served. The matter be processed for being listed before the Hon'ble Court, however, with the specific mention about theSignature Not Verified said application in the office report.Digitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.05.0212:50:01 ISTReason: (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.22 Court No.4 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 4438-4439/2014(From the judgement and order dated 29/11/2012 in WP No.853/2012, dated02/08/2013 in WP No.853/2012,CA No.1021/2013MCA No.11599/2013 of The HIGHCOURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR)STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSARUN BABULAL PATIL & ORS Respondent(s)WITH I.A. 1-2(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP andoffice report)Date: 24/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. B.H. Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudheer Voditel, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Adv. accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9. Issue notice to other respondents. Leave granted. If the respondents have any other claim, they may agitate the issue before the appropriate forum and it has nothing to do with the pendency of these cases.

| (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Assistant Registrar |