MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK v. BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS

ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/02/2015 in WP No. 1531/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Radhika Dwivedi, Adv. for Mr. B. K. Pal,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv. Mr. K.N. Gaikwad, Adv. Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. for M/s. J. S. Wad & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No ground to interfere with the impugned order is made out, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar) Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS

LISTED ON : 21.11.2016                         BEFORE COURT NO.: 02                              ITEM NO.:54       SECTION­IX            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPE AL (CIVIL) NO. 11166 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATON NO. (Application for exemption from filing Official Translation) MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK  ....PETITIONER ­VERSUS­ BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS                  ...RESPONDENTS     OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 17 th   April, 2015, when the Court was pleased to  pass the following Order: "Issue notice." And lastly, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar on  17 th   February, 2016, when the following Order was passed: "The Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 8 submits that she has filed counter affidavit. Registry to verify and if so, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. " It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that  there are nine respondents in the instant matter. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the respondents by registered A. D. post. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co., Advocates has filed vakalatnama/appearance and counter­affidavit along­with application for exemption from filing Official Translation on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 8. Counter­affidavit and application has been included in the paper­books. A. D. card duly signed has been received back from respondent No. 9 but no one has entered appearance so far. Service of notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 18 th   day of November, 2016.   ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. B. K. Pal,  Advocate  M/s. J. S. Wad & Co., Advocates  L  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ÔITEM NO.54 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/02/2015in WP No. 1531/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUSBRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s)Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.Ms. Radhika Dwivedi, Adv. for Mr. B. K. Pal,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv.Mr. K.N. Gaikwad, Adv.Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv.Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. for M/s. J. S. Wad & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNo ground to interfere with the impugned order is madeout, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of theConstitution of India.The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar)Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS

ÔITEM NO.54 COURT NO.2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/02/2015in WP No. 1531/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUSBRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s)Date : 21/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.Ms. Radhika Dwivedi, Adv. for Mr. B. K. Pal,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv.Mr. K.N. Gaikwad, Adv.Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv.Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. for M/s. J. S. Wad & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RNo ground to interfere with the impugned order is madeout, in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of theConstitution of India.The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kumar)Assistant Registrar AR-cum-PS

ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Keshav Kumar Choudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 8 submits that she has filed counter affidavit. Registry to verify and if so, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

, ITEM NO.73 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 17/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Keshav Kumar Choudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 8 submits that she has filed counter affidavit. Registry to verify and if so, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2016.02.1717:09:31 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 02/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. Ms. Promita Majumdar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 8 is awaited. Be filed within four weeks'. Service on respondent no. 9 is complete but none has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 17 th Feb, 2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

ITEM NO.72 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 02/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. Ms. Promita Majumdar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 8 is awaited. Be filed within four weeks'. Service on respondent no. 9 is complete but none has entered appearance on his behalf. List again on 17th Feb, 2016. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.12.0512:37:12 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 30/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.1 to 8 have yet to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks. Service of respondent No.9 is complete but none has entered appearance. List again on 2.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar

² ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) Date : 30/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Keshav Choudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv. M/s. J. S. Wad & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos.1 to 8 have yet to file the counter affidavit. Be filed within four weeks. Service of respondent No.9 is complete but none has entered appearance. List again on 2.12.2015. (RACHNA GUPTA) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2015.09.3018:00:56 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/02/2015 in WP No. 1531/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay) MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Keshar Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (SAROJ SAINI) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

\226 ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.12 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11166/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/02/2015 in WP No. 1531/2014 passed by the High Court of Bombay) MANOJ KANTILAL NAYAK Petitioner(s) VERSUS BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 17/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Keshar Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. B. K. Pal,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (USHA BHARDWAJ) (SAROJ SAINI) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byUsha Rani BhardwajDate: 2015.04.1813:04:01 ISTReason: