Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2017 / Diary 10217

ZAMEER v. SHAIK JAVED

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10217/2017

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

12-04-2017

Bench

Petitioner

ZAMEER

Respondent

SHAIK JAVED

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2017 (CC No(s).7430/2017) (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/02/2016 in FA No.340/2003 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad) ZAMEER Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHAIK JAVED & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP) Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. T he special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

vITEM NO.4 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No........../2017 (CC No(s).7430/2017)(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08/02/2016 in FA No.340/2003 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Aurangabad)ZAMEER Petitioner(s) VERSUSSHAIK JAVED & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP)Date : 12/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RDelay condoned.No ground for interference is made out in exercise ofour jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution ofIndia.T he special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India