"ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15648/2010(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2010 in CWP No. 2183/2010of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DURGAWATI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 16/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. By the impugned order, the High Court declined to interfere with the rejection of the petitioner's application for exemption of her land from acquisition primarily on the ground that she could not produce any evidence to show that the construction had been raised before issue of notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not draw our attention to any document from which it can be inferred that the petitioner had raised constructionbefore initiation of the process of acquisition. In view of the above, we do not find anyvalid ground or justification to interfere with theimpugned order. The special leave petition is accordinglydismissed. (A.D. Sharma) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.11 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15648/2010(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2010 in CWP No.2183/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DURGAWATI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With office report)Date: 07/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASOK KUMAR GANGULYFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Kumar Sanjay, Adv. Ms.Anupama Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by Mr. Vishnu Sharma that theinstructing counsel has met with an accident, hearing of thispetition is adjourned for six weeks. ( Satish K.Yadav ) ( Phoolan Wati Arora ) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.19 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 7600/2010(From the judgement and order dated 19/01/2010 in CWP No.2183/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)DURGAWATI Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report )Date: 11/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vishnu Sharma,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay of 5 days in refiling SLP is condoned. (S.G.SHAH) Registrarns