Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2010 / Diary 10205

ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF BIHAR

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10205/2010

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

20-08-2010

Bench

Petitioner

ANIL KUMAR SINGH

Respondent

STATE OF BIHAR

Primary Holding

A court may grant interim protection from arrest to a petitioner during the pendency of an SLP, and upon disposal, direct release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

. OUT TODAYITEM NO.60 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).2788/2010(From the judgement and order dated 21/01/2010 in CRLMC No.33700/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF PATNA)ANIL KUMAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for anticipatory bail and office report )Date: 20/08/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMAFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. We direct that in the event of arrest the appellant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of a sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety to the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The appeal is disposed of. [SUMAN WADHWA] [NEERU BALA VIJ] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER Signed order is placed on the file. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1567 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No. 2788/2010) ANIL KUMAR SINGH .. APPELLANT(S) vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR .. RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R

Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case we directthat in the event of arrest the appellant shall be releasedon bail on his furnishing personal bond of a sum ofRs.10,000/- with one surety to the like amount to thesatisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. .................J. (DALVEER BHANDARI) ....................J. (DEEPAK VERMA)New Delhi,August 20, 2010.

:ITEM NO.126 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ASHOK MENONPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).2788/2010ANIL KUMAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for anticipatory bail and office report ))Date: 14/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditya Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await service of notice on the respondent. List the matter on 26.7.2010. (ASHOK MENON)s Registrar

FITEM NO.19 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).2788/2010(From the judgement and order dated 21/01/2010 in CRLMCNo.33700/2009 of the HIGH COURT OF PATNA)ANIL KUMAR SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for anticipatory bail, exemption fromfiling O.T. and office report)Date: 12/04/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNANFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushil Kumar,Sr.Adv. Mr. Aditya Kumar,Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has drawn our attention to Annexure P-2 which is a letter dated 29th July, 2007 written by Shilpi Chauhan, stating therein that "whatever I brought from my parents I am taking that away with me." Mr. Sushil Kumar also pointed out that a complaint has been filed after two years of the incident, on 7.5.2009. -2- Issue notice. The petitioner shall not be arrested during theinterregnum period in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted tomake necessary correction in the SLP paper book.(A.S. BISHT) (NEERU BALA VIJ)COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India