ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12639/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/02/2017 in TR No. 22/2016 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati) BHUPENDRA KUMAR DAS Petitioner(s) VERSUS DIPANJALI CHETIA Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief) Date : 28/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Avijit Roy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned Order. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, i n view of the decision rendered by this court on 9 th March, 2017 in T.P.(C) No. 1912 of 2014 titled Krishna Veni Nagam vs. Harish Nigam, considering the health issues of the petitioner, he is at liberty to pray to the concerned court for participating in the proceedings by video conferencing. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.11 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12639/2017(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/02/2017in TR No. 22/2016 passed by the High Court Of Gauhati)BHUPENDRA KUMAR DAS Petitioner(s) VERSUSDIPANJALI CHETIA Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for permission to raise addl. grounds and file addl. document and interim relief)Date : 28/04/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Avijit Roy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard.We do not find any ground to interfere with theimpugned Order. The special leave petition is dismissed.However, i n view of the decision rendered by thiscourt on 9 th March, 2017 in T.P.(C) No. 1912 of 2014titled Krishna Veni Nagam vs. Harish Nigam, consideringthe health issues of the petitioner, he is at liberty topray to the concerned court for participating in theproceedings by video conferencing. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposedof. (NEELAM GULATI) COURT MASTER (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER