Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2011 / Diary 10196

JYOTI MEHTA v. M/S. VYAS AND VYAS .

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10196/2011

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

19-03-2012

Bench

Petitioner

JYOTI MEHTA

Respondent

M/S. VYAS AND VYAS .

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

LITEM NO. 52 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7617 OF 2011JYOTI MEHTA Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S. VYAS AND VYAS AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal,c/delayin re-filing appeal and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Manohar,Adv.rr.1rr.2 Mr. Pallav Sisodia,Sr. Adv. Mr. M Vyas, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The appeal is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master [ Signed order is placed on the file ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7617 OF 2011Jyoti Mehta .. Appellant(s) VersusM/s Vyas and Vyas & Anr. .. Respondent(s) O R D E R Delay condoned. No question of law arises for our consideration inthis statutory appeal. The appeal is dismissedaccordingly.

...................... [ D.K. JAIN, J. ] ...................... [ ANIL R. DAVE, J. ]NEW DELHI,MARCH 19, 2012.

LITEM NO. 52 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7617 OF 2011JYOTI MEHTA Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S. VYAS AND VYAS AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal,c/delayin re-filing appeal and office report)Date: 19/03/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Manohar,Adv.rr.1rr.2 Mr. Pallav Sisodia,Sr. Adv. Mr. M Vyas, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. The appeal is dismissed. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master [ Signed order is placed on the file ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7617 OF 2011Jyoti Mehta .. Appellant(s) VersusM/s Vyas and Vyas & Anr. .. Respondent(s) O R D E R Delay condoned. No question of law arises for our consideration inthis statutory appeal. The appeal is dismissedaccordingly.

...................... [ D.K. JAIN, J. ] ...................... [ ANIL R. DAVE, J. ]NEW DELHI,MARCH 19, 2012.

lITEM NO. 58 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7617 OF 2011JYOTI MEHTA Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S. VYAS AND VYAS AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal,c/delayin re-filing appeal and office report)Date: 27/02/2012 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVEFor Appellant(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Pallava Sisodia, Sr. Adv.rr.1 Mr. Mahender Vyasm Adv. Mr. P.K. Manohar,Adv.rr.2 Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is pointed out by learned counsel for the appellant that rejoinder affidavit along with additional documents has already been filed, but the same is not placed on record because of some office objections. Let the rejoinder affidavit, along with additional documents, as it is, be placed before us for consideration. List after two weeks. [ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Kusum Gulati ] Court Master Court Master

¨ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7617 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHJYOTI MEHTA Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S. VYAS AND VYAS AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal.,c/delay in re-filing appeal and office report)Date: 28/11/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Suchitra Pandey, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Manohar,Adv. Ms. Carishma Sehgal, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appellant may file additional documents, in view ofCourt's order dated 29.8.2011 on or before 2.1.2012. List thereafter before the Hon'ble Court, as perrules, without waiting for additional documents. (S.G. SHAH) REGISTRARrd

RITEM NO.109 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 7617 OF 2011 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRYJYOTI MEHTA Appellant (s) VERSUSM/S. VYAS AND VYAS AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal.,c/delay in re-filing appeal and office report)Date: 10/10/2011 This Appeal was called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. P.K. Manohar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is present andprays for time to file counter affidavit. Four weeks' time,as prayed for, is granted for the same. Four weeks' time is granted to the said respondentto file additional documents, as ordered. List again on 28.11.2011. (H.B. PRABHAKARA SASTRY) REGISTRARrd

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India