Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2021 / Diary 10191

RAJAT KALSAN v. OM PARKASH YADAV

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10191/2021

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

30-06-2021

Bench

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

Petitioner

RAJAT KALSAN

Respondent

OM PARKASH YADAV

Download PDF Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

SLP(Crl.)……..D.No.10191/21 1 ITEM NO.15 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) …………...Diary No(s).10191/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-01-2021 in CRMM No.3015/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) RAJAT KALSAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS OM PARKASH YADAV & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66792/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.66791/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.66788/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)) Date : 30-06-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gunjan Singh, Adv. Ms. Ankita Wilson, Adv. Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. The applications for permission to file the special leave petition as also exemption from filing affidavit are allowed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the record. Taking into consideration the fact that the impugned order passed by the High Court is interim in nature, we are not inclined to interfere with the same. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of. ………..2/-

SLP(Crl.)……..D.No.10191/21 2 However, we request the High Court to dispose of the matter, pending adjudication before it, on its own merit and in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. If the matter is not disposed of by the High Court within the time stipulated hereinabove, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer sought by him in the instant petition. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India