Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2022 / Diary 10186

RAJNI SHENDE v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10186/2022

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

18-04-2022

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Petitioner

RAJNI SHENDE

Respondent

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Primary Holding

An eligible in-service candidate under State medical education admission rules is entitled to incentive/preference marks as a matter of right, and procedural non-compliance by the State cannot defeat such entitlement, which may be enforced under Article 142 of the Constitution.

PDF 1 PDF 2 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

CA 2975/2022 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2975 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 6189 of 2022) Dr Rajni Shende Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and Others Respondents O R D E R 1 Leave granted. 2 The appeal has arisen from a judgment dated 16 March 2022 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ Petition No 3138 of 2022. 3 The appellant has been working as a Medical Officer with the State of Madhya Pradesh on a regular basis for over eleven years. The appellant has stated that out of the eleven years of service, she has served for six years in District Betul which is a notified tribal district and that the remaining period has been spent while serving in a Community Health Centre at Katangi in the District of Balaghat.

CA 2975/2022 2 4 Under the Madhya Pradesh Medical Education Admission Rules 2018, as amended, an in-service reservation is provided for serving candidates, defined as any candidate who is serving in a department of the Government of Madhya Pradesh who has registered on the portal after obtaining a No Objection Certificate from the employer. 5 The appellant appeared in the NEET–PG entrance examination and secured 317 marks. In-service candidates are entitled to the allocation of certain preference marks. In the present case, the eligibility of the appellant as an in-service candidate is not in issue. The dispute pertains to whether there was compliance with procedural requirements. 6 By the order of this Court dated 11 April 2022, one seat was directed to be kept vacant in the MS Obstetrics and Gynecology in GMC, Bhopal . In pursuance of the return of notice, we have heard Mr Saurabh Mishra, Additional Advocate General for the State of Madhya Pradesh, besides learned counsel for the appellant. 7 As an in-service candidate, the appellant would be entitled to the award of incentive marks in accordance with the applicable rules. Upon the grant of incentive marks to which the appellant is entitled, the appellant would be entitled to the allotment of the vacant seat which has been set apart in view of the interim order of this Court noted above.

CA 2975/2022 3 8 Hence, in the exercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, we direct that the State of Madhya Pradesh shall now process the application of the appellant as an in-service candidate and award her incentive marks in accordance with law. On that basis, the appellant shall be allotted the seat which has been directed to be kept vacant, namely, a post graduate seat in Obstetrics and Gynecology at GMC, Bhopal. The above direction is passed in the circumstances noted above, without expressing any opinion on any broader aspects of law which are kept open to be resolved in an appropriate case. 9 The appeal is accordingly allowed in the above terms and the judgment of the High Court is set aside. 10 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. … .....…...….......………………........J. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud] ..…....…........……………….…........J. [Surya Kant ] New Delhi; April 18, 2022 CKB

CA 2975/2022 4 ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.6189/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-03-2022 in WP No.3138/2022 passed by the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at Jabalpur) RAJNI SHENDE Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With I.R. and IA No.51147/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.51149/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.51644/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 18-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth R Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, AOR Mr. Shivam Baghel, Adv. Ms. Sunita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Pranjal Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurabh Mishra, AAG Mrs. Mrinal Elker Mazumdar, Adv.

CA 2975/2022 5 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1 Leave granted. 2 The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. 3 Pending orders, if any, stand disposed of. (CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)

SLP(C) 6189/2022 1 ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.6189/2022 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-03-2022 in WP No. 3138/2022 passed by the High Court of M.P. Principal Seat at Jabalpur) RAJNI SHENDE Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With I.R. and IA No.51147/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.51149/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.51644/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Date : 11-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth R. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shivam Baghel, Adv. Ms. Sunita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Pranjal Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Dhruv Tank, Adv. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, AOR For Respondent(s)

SLP(C) 6189/2022 2 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1 The petitioner is an in-service candidate who has submitted that she has served in the interior areas of the State of Madhya Pradesh during the course of her posting as a Medical Officer and fulfills all requirements for the reserved seats for in-service candidates. . 2 During the pendency of the writ proceedings before the High Court, interim orders were passed on 23 February 2022 (Annexure P-15) and 7 March 2022 (Annexure P-17). The order dated 7 March 2022 records that the petitioner had expressed an interest in pursuing the MS degree course in Obstetrics and Gynecology in MGM, Indore and GMC, Bhopal. 3 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the seat at MGM, Indore has been filled up, but the vacancy chart which has been put up as on 23 March 2022 (tendered by the counsel during the course of the proceedings) indicates that one seat is vacant at GMC, Bhopal in the subject of preference noted above. 4 Issue notice, returnable on 18 April 2022. 5 Liberty to serve the Standing Counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh, in addition. 6 Till the next date of listing one seat in MS Obstetrics and Gynecology in GMC, Bhopal shall be kept vacant to abide by the final directions of this Court. (CHETAN KUMAR) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India