Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2012 / Diary 10181

ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. v. B.H.E.L.

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10181/2012

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

26-10-2015

Bench

Petitioner

ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN.

Respondent

B.H.E.L.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 PDF 20 PDF 21 PDF 22 PDF 23 PDF 24 PDF 25 PDF 26 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.135 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 11341/2014 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Appellant(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 26/10/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the period stipulated in the order dated 03.08.2015 of this Court. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SS

Listed on 26.10.2015  ® Court No.   2 Item No.         SECTION – XVI  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION          CIVIL APPEAL NO.11341  OF  2014   Ashok Engineering Corpn.                     ... APPELLANTS ­VERSUS ­                                                                               B.H.E.L                            ...RESPONDENT       OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar  Court on 3.8.2015, when the  Court was pleased to pass the following Order: “Ld. counsel for the appellants shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the Ld. counsel for the respondent shall file the same within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 26.10.2015 . ” It is submitted that in pursuance of the order quoted above  neither  counsel for the appellant  nor respondent have filed statement of case so far. Service is complete. The matter above­mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.             Dated this the 16th day of October,  2015.                      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ . Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv.     Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Adv.                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

\220 ITEM NO.135 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 11341/2014 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Appellant(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 26/10/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the period stipulated in the order dated 03.08.2015 of this Court. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SSSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.10.2615:47:06 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.119 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 11341/2014 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Appellant(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 03/08/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the Ld.counsel for the respondent shall file the same within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 26.10.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

Listed on 3.8.2015  ® Court No.   2 Item No.     1197    SECTION – XVI  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION          CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 11341  OF  2014   Ashok Engineering corpn.                     APPELLANT ­VERSUS ­                                                                               B.H.E.L          ...RESPONDENT       OFFICE REPORT This is an  appeal  by Special Leave granted by this Hon'ble Court on  1.12.2014. It is submitted that there is sole respondent  in the appeal above­mentioned and   is represented through Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate. Service of notice is   complete  It is further submitted that  neither  counsel for the appellant nor respondent has   filed statement of case  so far. The matters above­mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar for Pre­ Final hearing under Order V Rule 30 SCR 2013.              Dated this the 30th  day of July   2015.                            ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ . Mr.Tarun Gupta, Adv.     Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,  Adv.              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

R ITEM NO.119 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 11341/2014 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Appellant(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 03/08/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the statement of case within a period of 45 days and the Ld.counsel for the respondent shall file the same within a period of 35 days thereafter. List again on 26.10.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.08.0515:55:54 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26004/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No. 335/2011 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Adv. Ms. Mumal Rajvi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (ASHA SONI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :1/12/2014    COURT No. :7    ITEM No.  :50 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) No. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. Ltd. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Hon'ble Court on 3/11/2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit. Three weeks time is granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. “   It is submitted that Rejoinder Affidavit as directed has not been filed so far.  The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 28 th  day of November, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

z ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.7 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26004/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No. 335/2011 passed by the High Court of Calcutta) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Adv. Ms. Mumal Rajvi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (ASHA SONI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2014.12.0117:23:56 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26004/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No. 335/2011 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 03/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit.. Three weeks' time is granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :3/11/2014    COURT No. :6    ITEM No.  :31 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) No. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Hon'ble Court on 8/08/2013 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable after four weeks. “   Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the sole respondent. Mr. Tayenjam Momosingh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the sole respondent and has on 9/09/2014 also filed Counter Affidavit and the same has been included in paper­books. The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 31 st  day of October, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

4 ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26004/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No. 335/2011 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 03/11/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking time to file rejoinder affidavit.. Three weeks' time is granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. List thereafter. [O.P. SHARMA] [INDU BALA KAPUR] COURT MASTER COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byOm Parkash SharmaDate: 2014.11.0317:07:22 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.801 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26004/2013 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 16/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the respondent has already filed the counter affidavit. Therefore, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SW

SUPPL SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :16/09/2014    COURT No. :R­2    ITEM No.  :101 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) Nos. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Learned Registrar's Court on 10/09/2014 when he was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Ld. Counsel for the respondent has stated that he has already on 9.09.2014 filed the counter affidavit. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. List again on 16.09.2014. “   It is submitted that Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate has on 9/09/2014 filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of the sole respondent. The Service of notice is complete.  The matter is listed before the Learned Registrar's Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 15 th  day of September, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26004/2013 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent has stated that he has already on 9.09.2014 filed the counter affidavit. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. List again on 16.09.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB

SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :10/09/2014    COURT No. :R­2    ITEM No.  :64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) Nos. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Learned Registrar's Court on 8/07/2014 when he was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Ld. counsel for the respondent is present. Six weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld. counsel for the respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 10.09.2014. “   It is submitted that Counter Affidavit has not been filed so far despite Ld. Registrar's Orders dated 14/02/2014 and 8/07/2014. The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Learned Registrar's Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 9 th  day of September, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :10/09/2014    COURT No. :R­2    ITEM No.  :64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) Nos. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Learned Registrar's Court on 8/07/2014 when he was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Ld. counsel for the respondent is present. Six weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld. counsel for the respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 10.09.2014. “   It is submitted that Counter Affidavit has not been filed so far despite Ld. Registrar's Orders dated 14/02/2014 and 8/07/2014. The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Learned Registrar's Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 9 th  day of September, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

SECTION­XVI         LISTED  On :10/09/2014    COURT No. :R­2    ITEM No.  :64 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (Civil) Nos. 26004 of 2013 With Prayer for Interim Relief) ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ... Petitioner Versus B.H.E.L. ... Respondent OFFICE­REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before Learned Registrar's Court on 8/07/2014 when he was pleased to pass the following Order: ­ “ Ld. counsel for the respondent is present. Six weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld. counsel for the respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 10.09.2014. “   It is submitted that Counter Affidavit has not been filed so far despite Ld. Registrar's Orders dated 14/02/2014 and 8/07/2014. The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Learned Registrar's Court with this Office­Report. Dated this the 9 th  day of September, 2014. Assistant Registrar Copy to: ­  Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate    Assistant Registrar

\230 ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26004/2013 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 10/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent has stated that he has already on 9.09.2014 filed the counter affidavit. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. List again on 16.09.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.09.1210:30:54 ISTReason:

SECTION XVI        LISTED ON : 08.07.2014            LEARNED REGISTRAR  NO :  02        ITEM NO.  :   69 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 26004 of 2013         (With prayer for interim ­relief)  ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ..PETITIONER VERSUS B.H.E.L.           ..RESPONDENT      OFFICE REPORT The matter above­mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court  on 14.2.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:­ “Respondent has filed vakalatnama. Granted time for filing Counter  Affidavit. List the matter on 24.03.2014. ”  It is submitted that the Counter  Affidavit as directed has not been filed, so far. The service of notice is complete. The matter is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office report.  Dated this the  7 th  day of March,  2014.  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:­ Mr. Tarun Gupta, Advocate  Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NK/or/14

\202 ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26004/2013 ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUS B.H.E.L. Respondent(s) Date : 08/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Saurav Agrawal,adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the respondent is present. Six weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the respondent to file the counter affidavit. List again on 10.09.2014. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2014.07.1113:48:39 ISTReason:

\202ITEM NO.41 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURAPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26004/2013ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.H.E.L. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 24/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Ashish Tiwari,adv. Mr.T.M.Singh,adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R|File not received. ||List again on 8.07.2014. | | | |(M.K.HANJURA) || | |Registrar |SB

pITEM NO.82 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26004/2013ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.H.E.L. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 14/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Ashish Tiwari,adv. Mr. Tayenjam Momo Singh,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent has filed vakalatnama. Granted time for filing counter affidavit. List the matter on 24.03.2014.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

HITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).26004/2013ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.H.E.L. Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 30/09/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of the sole respondent. List the matter on 4.12.2013.| | |(Sunil Thomas) || | |Registrar |SB

ITEM NO.44 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 12086/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No.335/2011, of TheHIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.H.E.L. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 08/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V.A.Mohta,Sr.Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. Nilkanth,Adv.for Mr. Tarun Gupta,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Delay condoned. Issue notice returnable after four weeks. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SNEH LATA SHARMA] AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ÎITEM NO.17 COURT NO.2 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 12086/2012(From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2011 in AP No.335/2011, of TheHIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)ASHOK ENGINEERING CORPN. Petitioner(s) VERSUSB.H.E.L. Respondent(s)With I.A.1(C/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 27/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tarun Gupta,AOR. Mr. Anup Jain, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Having regard to the letter circulated, let the matter be adjourned for four weeks, as prayed for.|(Sheetal Dhingra) | |(Juginder Kaur) ||COURT MASTER | |Assistant Registrar |

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India