ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. NO.5-6 IN Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s). 20835-20836/2012(From the judgement and order dated 15/02/2010 in CMA No. 3086/1999, CRPNo.6727/2003 of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)PALABOYINA SUREKHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSV.VENKAT RAO AND ORS Respondent(s)(For restoration and office report)Date: 19/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv. Ms. Vismai Rao, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The applications for restoration are allowed. Order dated 12.7.2012 is recalled. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners on the special leave petitions. There is an inordinate delay of 409 days in filing the special leave petitions and 117 days in refiling the same for which no reasonable explanation has been given. Even otherwise we find no merit in these special leave petitions. The same are, accordingly, dismissed both on the ground of delay and merit. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master
@ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 10495-10496/2012(From the judgement and order dated 15/02/2010 in CMA No.3086/1999,CRPNo.6727/2003 of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD)PALABOYINA SUREKHA RAO & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSV.VENKAT RAO AND ORS Respondent(s)With I.A.1-2 (C/delay in filing SLP,c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 12/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A letter has been circulated by learned counsel for the petitionerseeking adjournment of this matter on the ground that the counsel for thepetitioner is unable to attend this Court due to personal difficulty. Nopersonal difficulty has been specified. No one is present in the Courtwhen the matter was called out in the morning to make a request foradjournment. None is present even on second call. The special leave petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur) Court Master Court Master