\232 ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.6 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15905/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No. 22587/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS H.P. SANDHU Respondent(s) (with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 30/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. for Mr. D. S. Mahra,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. for Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is dismissed. (Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byParveen Kumar ChawlaDate: 2014.08.0118:12:34 ISTReason:
F ITEM NO.56 COURT NO.8 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15905/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No. 22587/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS H.P. SANDHU Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 07/07/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. D. S. Mahra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Not taken up. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PHOOLAN WATI ARORA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRARSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySatish Kumar YadavDate: 2014.07.0912:00:06 ISTReason:
D ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.9 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15905/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP 22587/2012 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh) UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS H.P. SANDHU Respondents(s) (with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date : 30/06/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. For Mr. D.S. Mahra,AOR(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. For Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,AOR(NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, and in the interest of justice, list again on 07.07.2014. (Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byParveen Kumar ChawlaDate: 2014.07.0115:02:09 ISTReason:
fITEM NO.46 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No.22587/2012of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 02/05/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Mohan Jain, ASG Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.K. Thakur, Adv. for Mr. D.S. Mahra,AOR(NP)For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. for Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,AOR(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned Additional solicitor General representing the petitioners seeks an adjournment to enable the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit. Prayer is allowed. List after four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit be filed, in the meantime. (Parveen Kr.Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Court Master Assistant Registrar
FITEM NO.57 COURT NO.13 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No.22587/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 14/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv. Mr. J.K. Mahapatra, Adv. Mr. Kushal Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Alok Mishra, Adv. for Mr. D.S. Mahra,AORFor Respondent(s) Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks an adjournment, so as to enable him to file rejoinder affidavit. List after six weeks. Rejoinder affidavit be filed, in the meantime. |(Parveen Kr.Chawla) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) ||Court Master | |Assistant Registrar || | | |
xITEM NO.50 COURT NO.10 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No.22587/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 14/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri, Sr.Adv. Mr. J.K. Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Alok Mishra, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated, the matter is adjourned by four weeks. [Usha Bhardwaj] [Sneh Lata Sharma] A.R-cum-P.S. Court Master
\220ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report)Date: 15/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Duli Chand, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikash Mahajan, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter falls under the completed category. No further steps required. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court,as per rules.| | | (M.A. SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd
SECTION IV B Listed on.28.10.2013 Court No.R1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No.69 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 15905 OF 2013 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF Union Of India & Ors. ....Petitioner(s) Versus H.P. Sandhu ....Respondent(s) OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 18.4.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :- “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. The operation of the impugned order passed by the High Court shall remain stayed until further orders. Petitioners would be at liberty to file additional documents within four weeks. ” It is submitted that show cause notice could not be issued as counsel for the petitioner had not filed process fee and spare copies of SLP. An office Report on default in this regard was listed before the Hon'ble Court (In Chambers) on 27.8.2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order :- “ Last opportunity is granted to the petitioners to file process fee and spare copies for service of notice on the respondents within two weeks.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to sole respondent on 13.9.2013 by registered AD Post. It is submitted that Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Advocate has entered appearance on his behalf on 22.10.2013 but identification of the sole respondent has not been marked on the Vakalatnama. However, service is complete. The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.
Dated this the 26th day of October, 2013. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:-Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR YKS -
üITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With prayer for interim relief and office report )Date: 28/10/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr Aviral Saxena, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Sole respondent is duly represented through the ld. Advocate, MsAnuradha Mutatkar but it appears that there is some technical flaw in thevakalatnama as identification of the respondent has not been marked. Thistechnical omission be rectified in a weeks' time. Four weeks' time isgranted for filing counter affidavit. List again on 4.12.2013.| | |(M.A.SAYEED) || | |REGISTRAR |hj
ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.3 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).15905/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No.22587/2012 of TheHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(Office report on default)Date: 27/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR (IN CHAMBERS)For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shalini Kumar, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Last opportunity is granted to the petitioners to file process fee and spare copies for service of notice on the respondents within two weeks. [ Neeta ] [ Indu Pokhriyal ] Sr. P.A. Court Master
ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.12 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2013 CC 8307/2013(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2012 in CWP No.22587/ 2012 ofthe HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSH.P. SANDHU Respondent(s)(With I.A. No.1 for c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 18/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. R.S. Suri,Sr.Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohapatra,Adv. Mr. Alok Mishra,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. The operation of the impugned order passed by the High Court shall remain stayed until further orders. Petitioners would be at liberty to file additional documents within four weeks. (A.S. BISHT) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER