Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2025 / Diary 10177

RAJKUMAR CHANDRAKAR v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10177/2025

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

23-09-2025

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

Petitioner

RAJKUMAR CHANDRAKAR

Respondent

THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.40 COURT NO.12 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8606/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-11-2024 in WA No.156/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur] RAJKUMAR CHANDRAKAR PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) FOR ADMISSION IA No. 78242/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 23-09-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, AOR Mr. Jatin Lalwani, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S Rajesh Agrajit, A.A.G. Ms. Ankita Sharma, AOR Mr. Arjun D Singh, Adv. Ms. Ishika Neogi, Adv. Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 27.11.2024 in WA No.156/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, titled “ Rajkumar Chandrakar vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. ”. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Having considered the contentions made across the Bar, we do not find any reason to grant Special Leave to Appeal. 1

4. As such, the present Special Leave Petition is dismissed on merits. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.9 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8606/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-11-2024 in WA No. 156/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur] RAJKUMAR CHANDRAKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. Respondent(s) FOR ADMISSION IA No. 78242/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 19-08-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, AOR For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.s Rajesh Agajit, Adv. Ms. Ankita Sharma, AOR Mr. Arjun D Singh, Adv. Ms. Ishika Neogi, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that counter affidavit has been filed, but the same is not on record. 2. Let the counter affidavit be placed on record. 3. As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, rejoinder affidavit be filed within four weeks. 4. Re-list the matter on 23.09.2025. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (ANU BHALLA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.16 SECTION IV-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8606/2025 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-11-2024 in WA No.156/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur] RAJKUMAR CHANDRAKAR PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) FOR ADMISSION IA No. 78242/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 04-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saksham Maheshwari, AOR For Respondent(s) : Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 1. Petitioner challenges the judgment and order dated 27-11-2024 in WA No.156/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur, titled “ Rajkumar Chandrakar vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others ”. 2. Issue notice, returnable on 13.05.2025. 3. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted. Let steps for service be taken within two weeks. 1

4. In the notice itself let it be mentioned that the respondents are required to file the counter affidavit before the next date of listing. (D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) 2

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India