*ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in WA No.436/2006,CANo.2/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI, ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)(With office report )(for final disposal)Date: 12/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASADFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.S.B.Upadhyay, Sr.Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr.Sarvjit Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr.Ankit Sibbal, Adv. Ms.Vartika Sahay Walia, Adv. For M/S Corporate Law Group, Advs UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the smallness of the amount involved in this petition, wedecline to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitutionof India. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master
RITEM NO.201 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in WA No.436/2006,CANo.2/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI, ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)(With office report )(for final disposal)Date: 27/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASADFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Mr.Rajesh Singh, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.S.B.Upadhyay, Sr.Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. M/S Corporate Law Group ,Adv(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List the matter for final disposal on a non-miscellaneous day. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master
FITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in WA No.436/2006 ,CA No.2/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 10/10/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASTI CHELAMESWARFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Ghosh Jena,Adv. Mr. S. Sundaram,Adv. Mr. Sridhar Nayak,Adv. Mr. Subidut,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Pawan Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Rajesh R.Dubey,Adv. Mr. Param Mishra,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kishor Singh,Adv. Ms. Anisha Upadhyay,Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Avijit Roy,Adv. Ms. Vartika Sahay,Adv. Mr. Navnit Kumar,Adv.for M/S Corporate Law Group ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List for final disposal. [SUMAN WADHWA] [M.S. NEGI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
ÈITEM NO.37 COURT NO.12 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in CA No. 2/2007 &WA No. 436/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.& ORS Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 15/07/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. GOKHALEFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr Adv. Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Ms. Minakshi Ghosh Jena, Adv. Mr. Sridhar Nagar, Adv.For Respondent(s) Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr. Arjit Roy, Adv. Ms. Vartika Sahay, Adv. Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Param Kr. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kishore Singh, Adv. Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Adv. M/S Corporate Law Group UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of the learned counsel for the State Government, the matters are adjourned by four weeks to enable the State Government to file reply affidavit. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
ÊITEM NO.33 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 09/05/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Pawan Kishore Singh,adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Ms.Vartika Sahay,adv. M/S Corporate Law Group ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. No request for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 for filing counter affidavit. Hence, place the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
\222ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 06/04/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Ms.Minakshi Arora,adv. Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Pawan Upadhyay,adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. Mr.Keshav Ray Chaudhuri,adv M./s Corporate Law Group,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. Respondent No.2 and 3 seeks four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Granted. It is submitted by the Ld.counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 that though vakalatnama is filed, the name of the counsel is not being shown in the cause list. Office to update the data. List the matter on 9.05.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
|ITEM NO.66 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 01/03/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr.R.N.Thakur,adv. Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr.Pawan Upadhyay,adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent No.3 is an Officer not under Respondent No.1, but under Respondent No.2. Ld.counsel seeks two weeks time as a last chance for serving it on the Standing Counsel of Respondent No.2, if Respondent No.3 is an Officer under Respondent No.2. File proof of service as a last chance. List the matter on 6.04.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
êITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 19/01/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Ms. Minakshi Ghosh,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Pawan Upadhyay,Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent No 1 has filed Vakalatnma. Granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No. 2 has been served. Vakalatnama not filed. Await return of notice of respondent No. 3. It is submitted by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.3 is an officer of respondent No.1. If that be so, counsel for the petitioner may serve notice on respondent No.3 through the counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and file proof. List the matter on 1.3.2011. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
:ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 06/12/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Mrs.Minakshi Ghosh,adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. RespondentNo.2 has been served. Granted four weeks time for filingvakalatnama and counter affidavit, if any. List the matter on 19.01.2011. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB
¢ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(Civil)No(s).20240-20241/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 25/10/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await return of notice of respondent No.1 to 3. List the matter on 6.12.2010. (SUNIL THOMAS)s Registrar
¤ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in WA No.437/2006 and CA No. 2/2007 in WA No.437/2006 of The HIGH COURTOF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 30/08/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Dipankar Prasad Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena, Adv. Ms. Minakshi Ghosh Jena, Adv. Mr. Manmohan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. (Neetu Sachdeva) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr. P. A. Court Master
vITEM NO.41 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in CA No. 2/2007 &WA No. 436/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI,ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 25/08/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. The matter is adjourned by one week in view of the contents stated in the letter. (Sonia) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr.P.A. Court Master
èITEM NO.28 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20240-20241/2010(From the judgement and order dated 08/01/2010 in CA No. 2/2007 &WA No. 437/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF GUWAHATI ,ASSAM)M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)Date: 02/08/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv. Ms. Minakshi Jena, Adv. Mr. Manmohan, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter. Two weeks' time, as prayed for, is granted to the advocate for the petitioner in view of the reasons stated in the letter. List the matter thereafter. (Sonia) (Renuka Sadana) Sr.P.A. Court Master
lITEM NO.2 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2010 CC 7744-7745/2010M/S MANIPUR TEA ESTATE Petitioner(s) VERSUSTHE POWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.&ORS Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP)Date: 15/07/2010 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Ms Minakshi Ghosh Jena, Adv. Mr Manmohan, Adv. Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Application for condonation of delay of 6 days inrefiling the special leave petition is allowed. (S.G. SHAH) Registrarhj