IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.)NO.631 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.464 OF 2011 JAIKANT PRASAD … PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR … RESPONDENT(S) WITH REVIEW PETITION (CRL.)NO.241 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.465 OF 2011 NAWAL PRASAD @ NAWAL KUMAR … PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR … RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Applications for hearing in open court are rejected. In these review petitions, the petitioner has challenged the order of this Court dated 25.2.2016, whereby the above mentioned appeals were dismissed. Having carefully gone through the review petitions, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned. 1
The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. .................... J. (ARUN MISHRA) .................... J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) New Delhi; November 30, 2016. 2
CHAMBER MATTER SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS R.P.(Crl.)No.631/2016 In Crl.A.No.464/2011 JAIKANT PRASAD Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for hearing in open Court) WITH R.P.(Crl.)No.241/2016 In Crl.A.No.465/2011-(With appln.(s) for hearing in open court) Date : 30/11/2016 These petitions were circulated today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R The review petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar (Signed order is placed on the file) 3
àIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.)NO.631 OF 2016IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.464 OF 2011 JAIKANT PRASAD ⬠¦ PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ⬠¦ RESPONDENT(S)WITH REVIEW PETITION (CRL.)NO.241 OF 2016IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.465 OF 2011 NAWAL PRASAD @ NAWAL KUMAR ⬠¦ PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR ⬠¦ RESPONDENT(S)O R D E RApplications for hearing in open court are rejected.In these review petitions, the petitioner haschallenged the order of this Court dated 25.2.2016,whereby the above mentioned appeals were dismissed.Having carefully gone through the review petitions,the order under challenge and the papers annexedtherewith, we are satisfied that there is no errorapparent on the face of the record, warrantingreconsideration of the order impugned.1The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. .................... J. (ARUN MISHRA) .................... J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)New Delhi;November 30, 2016.2CHAMBER MATTER SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSR.P.(Crl.)No.631/2016 In Crl.A.No.464/2011JAIKANT PRASAD Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for hearing in open Court)WITH R.P.(Crl.)No.241/2016 In Crl.A.No.465/2011-(With appln.(s) for hearing in open court) Date : 30/11/2016 These petitions were circulated today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL By Circulation UPON perusing papers the Court made the followingO R D E R The review petitions are dismissed in terms of thesigned order. (Sarita Purohit) (Renuka Sadana ) Court Master Assistant Registrar(Signed order is placed on the file)3