Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2015 / Diary 10157

MOOL CHAND SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10157/2015

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

26-04-2016

Bench

Petitioner

MOOL CHAND SHARMA

Respondent

STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

Primary Holding

When a High Court disposes of a writ petition without addressing any of the contentions raised by the petitioner, such an order is liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration with a reasoned, detailed order.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4455 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 25966 of 2015) MOOL CHAND SHARMA ... Appellant VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS ... Respondents O R D E R Leave granted. While issuing notice in this matter on 07.09.2015, the following order was passed: “Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not considered various submissions argued before it.” It is not necessary to reproduce various submissions of the appellant by which he challenged the cancellation of his license for the fair price shop by the respondent authorities. What we find from the impugned order is that the High Court has not dealt with any of the contentions raised and it would, therefore, be appropriate to set aside the order of the High Court and remit the case to the High Court for hearing the matter afresh and deciding the same by a detailed order. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms. We are informed that after the cancellation of the 1

C.A. No. 4455/2016 license of the appellant, the respondents have not allotted the said fair price shop to any person. In these circumstances, the appellant makes a prayer that during the pendency of the proceedings before the High Court, he may be allowed to run the fair price shop and he would not claim any equity. It would be apposite for the appellant to make such a request before the High Court. In any case, we are of the opinion that the matter be decided by the High Court expeditiously. ......................., J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] ......................., J. [ R.K. AGRAWAL ] New Delhi; April 26, 2016. 2

C.A. No. 4455/2016 ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 26/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. Dr. B. K. Jauhari, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master [Signed order is placed on the file.] 3

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   :   26.04.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA     Court No.     :  12                          CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION        Item No.       : 5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 25966 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MOOL CHAND SHARMA                               …..PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS           ….RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07.09.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to  whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to  consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not  considered various submissions argued before it.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the four respondents through registered post A.D. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of all the respondents. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. The Interlocutory Application Nos. 3 & 4 (Application for Direction & exemption from filing official translation) filed by Counsel for the Petitioner were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ I.A.Nos. 3 & 4 of 2016 : Dismissed. SLP(C) No. 25966/2015 Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeks  thereafter. List the petition on 26 th  April, 2016.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Respondents has on 11.04.2016 filed Counter Affidavit and same is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. It is further submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 21.04.2016 filed Rejoinder Affidavit and same is being circulated to the Hon'ble Court. The   matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 25 th  day of April , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:   Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

\% IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4455 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 25966 of 2015) MOOL CHAND SHARMA ... Appellant VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS ... Respondents O R D E R Leave granted. While issuing notice in this matter on 07.09.2015, the following order was passed: "Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not considered various submissions argued before it." It is not necessary to reproduce various submissions of the appellant by which he challenged the cancellation of his license for the fair price shop by the respondent authorities. What we find from the impugned order is that the High Court has not dealt with any of the contentions raised and it would, therefore, be appropriate to set aside the order of the High Court and remit the case to the High Court for hearing the matter afresh and deciding the same by a detailed order. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaidSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNIDHI AHUJADate: 2016.05.03 terms.16:48:05 ISTReason: We are informed that after the cancellation of the 1C.A. No. 4455/2016 license of the appellant, the respondents have not allotted the said fair price shop to any person. In these circumstances, the appellant makes a prayer that during the pendency of the proceedings before the High Court, he may be

allowed to run the fair price shop and he would not claim any equity. It would be apposite for the appellant to make such a request before the High Court. In any case, we are of the opinion that the matter be decided by the High Court expeditiously. ......................., J. [ A.K. SIKRI ] ......................., J. [ R.K. AGRAWAL ] New Delhi; April 26, 2016. 2C.A. No. 4455/2016ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s)(With office report)Date : 26/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. Dr. B. K. Jauhari, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master [Signed order is placed on the file.] 3

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015 MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ashutosh Kr.Sharma,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.71 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015 MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 17/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ashutosh Kr.Sharma,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R All the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2016.03.1716:58:34 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. Nos. 3 & 4/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 14/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. Dr. B. K. Jauhari, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv. Mr. Mukul Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I. A. Nos. 3 & 4 of 2016 Dismissed. SLP (C)No. 25966/2015 Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. List the petition on 26 th April, 2016. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

SECTION XI                 LISTED ON   :   14.03.2016       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA     Court No.     :                            CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION        Item No.       :  SUPPLEMENTARY LIST     INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3 & 4 (Application for Direction & exemption from filing official translation)             IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) NO. 25966 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MOOL CHAND SHARMA                               …..PETITIONERS                   VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS           ….RESPONDENTS                 OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 07.09.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not considered various submissions argued before it.” Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the four respondents through registered post A.D. on 23.09.2015. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of all the respondents but Counter Affidavit has not been filed so far. Service of Show Cause Notice is complete. It is submitted that I.A.Nos. 3 & 4 Application for Direction & exemption from filing official translation filed by Counsel for the Petitioner were mentioned before the Hon'ble Court on 08.03.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “The instant Interlocutory Application No. 3/2016  may not be deleted from the list of 14 th  March,  2016.” The  Application in the matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 12 th  day of March , 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:   Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate.                                 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s2

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. Nos. 3 & 4/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for directions, exemption from filing O.T. andoffice report)Date : 14/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv.Dr. B. K. Jauhari, Adv.Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Adv.Mr. Aviral Saxena, Adv.Mr. Mukul Singh, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RI. A. Nos. 3 & 4 of 2016 Dismissed.SLP (C)No. 25966/2015Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks.Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeksthereafter.List the petition on 26 th April, 2016. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

¬ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI(Mentioned) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSInterlocutory Application No. 3/2016 inPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature atAllahabad)MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s)(For directions)Date : 08/03/2016 This application was mentioned today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWALFor Petitioner(s)Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. (Mentioned by)Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe instant Interlocutory Application No. 3/2016 maynot be deleted from the list of 14 th March, 2016. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master

@ ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI (Mentioned) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Interlocutory Application No. 3/2016 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 25966/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (For directions) Date : 08/03/2016 This application was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Petitioner(s) Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The instant Interlocutory Application No. 3/2016 may not be deleted from the list of 14th March, 2016. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byNIDHI AHUJADate: 2016.03.1705:22:28 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015 MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 03/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Dr.B.K.Jauhari,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ashutosh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to all the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List the matter again on 17.03.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB

ITEM NO.92 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s)(with office report)Date : 03/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Dr.B.K.Jauhari,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ashutosh Sharma,Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RFour weeks time as last chance is given to all the respondentsto file the counter affidavit.List the matter again on 17.03.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB

ITEM NO.118 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015 MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Dr. B.K Jauhari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to all the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List the matter again on 14.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar ss

\224 ITEM NO.118 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25966/2015 MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Dr. B.K Jauhari, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to all the respondents to file the counter affidavit. List the matter again on 14.01.2016. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSignature Not Verified ssDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.10.2615:47:18 TLTReason:

ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8251/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(with c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Dr. B.K. Jauhari, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. Mr. Mahender Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not considered various submissions argued before it. (Ashwani Thakur) (Renu Diwan ) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

SECTION XI                                          LISTED ON  :  7.9.2015        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF  INDIA                 COURT NO. :  14         CIVIL APPELLATE  JURISDICTION                      ITEM NO.    :  47 PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) CC.. NO. 8251 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF MOOL CHAND SHARMA                      ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS        ...RESPONDENT(S)                OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 14.08.2015 when the Court was pleased to  pass the following Order: “In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the Petitioner, adjourned for three weeks.” It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 4.9.2015 filed Additional documents with application for permission to file the same is being circulated for perusal of the Court. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 4 th  day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to:    Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocate  ASSISTANT REGISTRAR S­2

: ITEM NO.47 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8251/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) I.A. 1/2015(with c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 07/09/2015 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. Dr. B.K. Jauhari, Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari, Adv. Mr. Mahender Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks limited to the issue as to whether matter needs to be remitted back to the High Court to consider the writ afresh on merit as the High Court has not considered various submissions argued before it.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byASHWANI KUMARDate: 2015.09.0918:05:09 ISTReason: (Ashwani Thakur) (Renu Diwan) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8251/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 14/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. B.K.Jauhari,Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari,Adv. Mr. Adil Muneet A.,Adv. Ms. Damyanti Juneja,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, adjourned for three weeks. (SUMAN WADHWA) AR-cum-PS (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER

Ò ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)......CC No(s). 8251/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/12/2014 in CMWP No. 29209/2012 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad) MOOL CHAND SHARMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 14/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. B.K.Jauhari,Adv. Ms. Purnima Jauhari,Adv. Mr. Adil Muneet A.,Adv. Ms. Damyanti Juneja,Adv. Mr. Deepak Anand,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, adjourned for three weeks. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SUMAN JAIN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySuman WadhwaDate: 2015.08.1417:10:37 ISTReason:

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India