Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2018 / Diary 10123

LEKHA V.S. v. THE STATE OF KERALA REP BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10123/2018

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

09-05-2023

Bench

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Petitioner

LEKHA V.S.

Respondent

THE STATE OF KERALA REP BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

Primary Holding

When a High Court, on remand, fails to assign tangible reasons for discarding the market value determined by the Reference Court under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and resorts to mere rough estimation, the appellate court is justified in restoring the Reference Court's award of compensation.

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 PDF 6 PDF 7 PDF 8 PDF 9 PDF 10 PDF 11 PDF 12 PDF 13 PDF 14 PDF 15 PDF 16 PDF 17 PDF 18 PDF 19 PDF 20 PDF 21 PDF 22 PDF 23 PDF 24 PDF 25 PDF 26 PDF 27 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 CORRECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO.3547/2023 [Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5472/2018] PUSHPA SADASIVAN                                   Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR.                         Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3548/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8374/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3557/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9554/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3558/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9283/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3559/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9555/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3560/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO.9918/2023 [Diary No.41897/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3549/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7485/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3550/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7274/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3551/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6887/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3552/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6051/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3553/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7158/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3554/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8175/2018]

2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO.3547/2013 [Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5472/2018] PUSHPA SADASIVAN                                   Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR.                         Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3548/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8374/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3557/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9554/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3558/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9283/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3559/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 9555/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3560/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) NO.9918/2023 [Diary No.41897/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3549/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7485/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3550/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7274/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3551/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6887/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3552/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6051/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3553/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7158/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3554/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8175/2018]

3 CIVIL APPEAL NO.3555/2023 [Arising out SLP(C) No. 6934/2018] CIVIL APPEAL NO.3556/2023 [Arising out of SLP(C) No. 6845/2018] O R D E R Leave granted. 2. This batch of 14 appeals assails the Judgment and Order dated 13­10­2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam whereby compensation granted by the Reference Court under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, `1894 Act’) in respect of acquisition of the lands of the appellants for development of International Airport at Thiruvananthapuram, has been reduced. 3. The Respondents issued Notification under Section 4 of the 1894 Act on 10­08­2004, followed by declaration under Section 6 of the Act on 25­01­2005. The Land Acquisition Officer broadly categorized the acquired land in five groups and assessed the market value @ Rs.1,62,686/­ per are, Rs.1,21,507/­, Rs.1,09,357/­ per are, Rs.97,206/­ per are and Rs.73,600/­ per are. 4. The Reference Court passed different Awards on 13­07­2008, 30­07­2008, 14­08­2008 and 27­03­2009 by categorising the acquired land in four groups and enhanced the compensation @ Rs.13,23,500/­ per are, Rs.14,88,900/­ per are, Rs.16,54,307/­ per are and Rs.17,00,000/­ per are.

4 5. The State of Kerala challenged the Reference Court’s awards in appeals and the High Court vide Judgment dated 04­02­2011 allowed those appeals in part and reduced the compensation in respect of all the four categories of land to Rs.9,00,000/­ per are, Rs.9,50,000/­ per are, Rs.10,00,000/­ per are and Rs.13,30,743/­ per are. 6. The aggrieved land­owners approached this Court by way of Civil Appeal No.6063/2011 and other connected matters. 7. A Co­ordinate Bench of this Court vide Judgment dated 17­02­2016 set aside the High Court order and remanded the appeals for fresh consideration by the High Court. The reasons assigned by this Court for remanding the case for fresh adjudication are discernible from Paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the Judgment dated 17­02­2016 which are extremely relevant and read as follows:­ “5.  The order of the High Court does not indicate the reasons as to why the land acquired for the purpose of acquisition for expansion/development of the International Airport was understood to be akin to the land acquired for the purpose of acquisition for widening of Bakery Palayam Airport Road for TRIDA. Though the learned counsel for the State has tried to lay before us necessary materials in this regard to show the close nexus/similarity between the two we cannot go into the said facts at the instance of the learned counsel for the State in the absence thereof in the order of the High Court. The order of the High Court, in our considered view, ought to have indicated the reasons on the basis of which the High Court had considered the land acquired for the purposes of the two acquisitions to be similar so as to enable us to scrutinize the correctness of

5 the same. 6. As already noticed, the acquisition in both the cases i.e. Land Acquisition Appeal No. 867 of 2008 and Land Acquisition Appeal No. 673 of 2010 was for the purposes of widening of Bakery Palayam Airport Road. The High Court thought it proper to rely on the judgment passed in Land Acquisition Appeal No. 673 of 2010 and not the judgment in Land Acquisition Appeal No.867 of 2008. The reasons therefor are also not indicated in the order of the High Court. 7. Even if we assume that the High Court has good reasons to rely on the judgment rendered in Land Acquisition Appeal No.673 of 2010 instead of Land Acquisition Appeal No.867 of 2008, there is no basis to enable us to understand as to how and on what basis the High Court had awarded different amounts of compensation, less than Rs.10 lakh (as awarded in Land Acquisition Appeal No.673 of 2010).” 8. It may be seen that in the course of fresh consideration, the High Court was obligated to determine as to whether its previous decisions in Land Acquisition Appeal No.867/2008 or in Land Acquisition Appeal No.673/2010 would be relevant to be followed as an examplar for determining the fair and just market value of the acquired land. After the remand, the High Court has vide impugned judgment reiterated the same rate of compensation as was determined by it vide previous Judgment dated 04­02­2011, a brief reference to which has already been given in para 5 above. 9. The aggrieved land­owners are again before this Court. 10. We have heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as

6 learned Senior Counsel for the State of Kerala and have perused the relevant material on record with their able assistance. 11. It is an admitted fact that the acquired land is within the revenue estate of Pettah Village and even according to the High Court, the acquired properties were abutting arterial road leading from the heart of Thiruvananthapuram city to the International Airport. It further appears that the land­owners relied upon three decisions (Exhibit `A1’ to Exhibit `A3’) before the High Court as relevant examplars for determining the market value of their land. The High Court has proceeded to distinguish these three judgments for various reasons including that Exhibit `A’ pertains to a land situated near an over bridge junction which is in the heart of the Thiruvananthapuram city. These decisions, according to the High Court, could not be relied upon as no comparable sale method was adopted while deciding those cases. The High Court has further held that the judgments relied upon do not pertain to lands in close proximity to the acquired land. Eventually, it concluded that the only option available is to make a rough estimate of the market value of the acquired land.  12. While remanding the case, this Court had categorically opined that the High Court will consider the two decisions rendered in Land Acquisition Appeal No.867/2008 and Land Acquisition Appeal No.673/2010 and then determine as to which of the two judgments was of close proximity or relevant for the purpose of evaluating the market value of the acquired land. Unfortunately, no such effort

7 has been made by the High Court.  The impugned Judgment does not hold that the Reference Court while categorizing the acquired land in four groups or in determining their market value, misread any evidence; relied upon any irrelevant examplar or over­estimated the potentiality of the acquired land. 13. The High Court has finally assessed the market value on the basis of rough estimate, overlooking the fact that the value so assessed by it in the previous round was disapproved by this Court. 14. Since the High Court has failed to give any tangible reason to discard the market value fixed by the Reference Court, it appears to us that there was no occasion to reduce the rate of compensation on the basis of rough estimate undertaken by the High Court. Keeping in view the location of the acquired land which is a compact piece; the public purpose for which it has been acquired; the fact that the land is situated within Thiruvananthapuram city and has great potentiality to be utilized for residential, commercial, industrial or any other development purposes, we are satisfied that the compensation awarded by the Reference Court is fair and just and does not warrant any interference. 15. For the reasons afore­stated, the appeals are allowed; the impugned Judgment of the High Court is set aside and the awards passed by the Reference Court are restored. Consequently, the appellants shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the awards passed in their favour by the Reference Court along with other statutory benefits under the 1894 Act.

8 Civil Appeal No.9816/2011:­ 1. In this appeal also, the appellant’s land measuring 1.92 ares is situated in Village Pettah within the city of Thiruvananthapuram. The appellant’s land was proposed to be acquired for development of International Airport vide Notification dated 04­02­1999 issued under Section 4 of the 1894 Act. After acquisition, the Land Acquisition Officer passed an Award on 16­05­2000 fixing the market value of the land @ Rs.62,929/­ per are. The appellant filed reference under Section 18 of the Act and the Reference Court vide Award dated 11­04­2008 enhanced the compensation to Rs.15,00,000/­ per are. The State of Kerala challenged the Reference Court award before the High Court and vide impugned Judgment dated 10­01­2011, the High Court has reduced the compensation to Rs.1,32,865/­ per are. 2. Since in other Civil Appeals, we have upheld the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for the land of Village Pettah acquired for the same public purpose of development of International Airport at Thiruvananthapuram, we see no reason to not apply the same analogy in the case of the appellant also. 3. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed; the impugned Judgment dated 10­01­2011 of the High Court is set aside and the Award passed by the Reference Court in favour of the appellant on 11­04­2008 is restored along with all other statutory benefits under the 1894 Act.

9 4. State of Kerala and its authorities shall deposit the enhanced amount of compensation with the Reference Court within eight weeks. .............J (SURYA KANT) ................J               (J.B. PARDIWALA) NEW DELHI;  9TH MAY, 2023.

10 ITEM NO.2               COURT NO.9               SECTION XI­A                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)  No.5472/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated  13­10­2017 in LAA No. 31/2010 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam) PUSHPA SADASIVAN                                   Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR.                         Respondent(s)   WITH C.A. No. 9816/2011 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI­A) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 134925/2022) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI­A) Diary No.41897/2018 (XI­A) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP ON IA 169401/2018)) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI­A) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI­A) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 134939/2022) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI­A) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 134916/2022)   Date : 09­05­2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA For Petitioner(s)                    Mr. Prashant Padmanabhan, AOR                                        Mr. C.N. Sreekumar, Sr. Adv.                    Ms. Anupama Kumar, Adv.                    Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.                    Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR

11                    Mr. K.N. Bhargavan, Adv.                    Mr. Saurabh Bhargavan, Adv.                    Mr. Nikhil S Nair, Adv.                    Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR                                                           Mr. Rajesh P., AOR                    Mr. Deeptanshu Jain, Adv.                    Mr. Manoranjan Sharma, Adv.                    For Respondent(s)                    Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR                                        Mr. Jayanth Muth Raj, Sr. Adv.                    Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR                    Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv.                    Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv.                    Ms. Miranda Solaman, Adv.                                                  UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The appeals are allowed, in terms of the signed Order. 4. Pending applications also stand disposed of.   (VISHAL ANAND)                                  (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                          COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed Order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.106               COURT NO.9               SECTION XI­A                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal  No.9816/2011 PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA                               Appellant(s)                                 VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR.                             Respondent(s)   Date : 12­04­2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR For Appellant(s)                                        Mr. C N Sreekumar, Sr. Adv.                    Ms. Anupama Kumar, Adv.                    Mr. Aswin Somakumar, Adv.                    Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR                    For Respondent(s)                                        Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR                    Mr. Abdulla Naseeh V T, Adv.                    Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv.                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R Heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. As prayed for by learned Senior counsel, list the appeal for hearing along with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.5472 of 2018 and other connected matters.   (VISHAL ANAND)                                  (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                          COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.107(MM) COURT NO.9 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s).9816/2011 PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) Date : 23-03-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI For Appellant(s) Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On a joint request made by learned counsel for the parties, list on 12.04.2023. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (Only SLP(C)...D. No. 41897 of 2018 is to be listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 24.10.2019. ) WITH Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (XI-A) Date : 24-10-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasanth P., AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) Ms Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Diary No(s). 41897/2018 Respondent nos. 1 and 2 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court after completion of period of four weeks whether counter affidavit is filed or not as further opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.11 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (Only SLP(C)...D. No. 41897 of 2018 is to be listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar for service compliance. ) WITH Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (XI-A) ) Date : 06-09-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasanth P., AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) Ms Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr Amith Krishnan,Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Diary No(s). 41897/2018 Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 2. Ld. Counsel, Ms Anu K Joy appearing on behalf of Mr Nishe Rajen Shonker, Advocate-on-record appears for the respondent-State of Kerala. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit be filed within four weeks time. List again on 24.10.2019. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

1 ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (Only I.A. Nos. 48319 and 48298 of 2019 (Applications for impleadment) in SLP(C) Nos. 6845 and 6934 of 2018 respectively AND SLP(C)...D. No. 41897 of 2018 for default are to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chamber. ) WITH SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) ( FOR impleading party ON IA 48319/2019 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 48319/2019) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) ( FOR impleading party ON IA 48298/2019 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 48298/2019) Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (XI-A) Date : 30-07-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasanth P., AOR Mr. K.N. Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Ms. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

2 Diary No(s). 41897/2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for and is granted two weeks' time to do the needful. IA 48319/2019 in SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 & IA 48298/2019 in SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 The applications for impleadment of the applicants as party respondents are allowed in view of the order dated 17.07.2019 passed in the main matter i.e., SLP(C) No. 5472/2018. (ASHWANI KUMAR) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) IA No. 48291/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) (FOR impleading party ON IA 48319/2019 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 48319/2019 IA No. 48319/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) (FOR impleading party ON IA 48298/2019 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 48298/2019 IA No. 48298/2019 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (XI-A) Date : 17-07-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasanth P., AOR Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR Mr. K. N. Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. Manoranjan Sharma, adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No.48291/2019 (Application for impleadment to implead the applicant as party respondent No.3) is allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection in this regard. (TUSHAR BISHT) (RENU KAPOOR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 08-03-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Rajesh, Adv. Mr. Anzu K. Varkey, Adv. Mr. Nishad L.S., Adv. Mr. Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Mohammad Sadique T.E., Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR

Item No.28 -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Respondent No.1 has already filed counter affidavit. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance. SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit. SLP(C) Nos.5472, 6887, 7485, 7274, 7158, 6051, 6845 and 6934/2018 Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of both the respondents in all the matters. SLP(C) Nos.9555, 9283 and 9554/2018 Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have not filed counter affidavit, despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is declined. Registry to process all the matters for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (XI-A) Date : 22-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.N. Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR

Item No.47 -2- Mr. Rajesh P., AOR Mr. Prasanth P., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Last opportunity is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.2 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. Dasti is requested, permitted in addition. SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 Last opportunity is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. Diary No(s). 41897/2018 Cause title has been amended. Spare copies have not been filed. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for appropriate orders. Remaining matters Last opportunity is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit within four weeks. List again on 8.3.2019. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.12 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 41897/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 872/2009 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) C.C. ISSAC SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA Respondent(s) (IA No.169401/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.169393/2018-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.169396/2018- SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT and IA No.169398/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.169399/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.169394/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.169397/2018-APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT ) Date : 07-12-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA For Petitioner(s) *Mr. Prasanth P., Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application, application for setting aside abatement and the application for substitution to bring the Legal representatives of the deceased petitioner on record are allowed. Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.

Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition as well as in the Special Leave Petition. Tag with SLP(C) No. 5472 of 2018. (DEEPAK SINGH) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) * Appearance slip not given.

ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 19-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr K.N.Bhargava, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR

-2- Item No.58 For Respondent(s) Ms Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr Reegan S Bel, Adv. Mr Nebil Nizar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith address to effect service on respondent no.2 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 Respondent nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. REMAINING MATTERS Respondent nos.1 and 2 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. List again on 22.1.2019. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 17-09-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv.

Item No.70 -2- Mr. Reegan S. Bel, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.5472/2018,SLP(C) No. 6051/2018,SLP(C) No.6845/2018, SLP(C) No. 6934/2018,SLP(C) No. 9555/2018, SLP(C) No. 7158/2018, SLP(C) No. 6887/2018,SLP(C) No. 7274/2018, SLP(C) No. 7485/2018, SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 and SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the said respondents submitted that complete set of pleadings has not been served. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve complete set of pleadings within one week and file proof thereof. Period of four weeks for filing counter affidavit shall reckon thereafter. SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the said respondent submitted that complete set of pleadings has not been served. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve complete set of pleadings within one week and file proof thereof. Period of four weeks for filing counter affidavit shall reckon thereafter. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh and complete address of respondent No.2 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.

Item No.70 -3- SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the said respondents submitted that complete set of pleadings has not been served. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve complete set of pleadings within one week and file proof thereof. Period of four weeks for filing counter affidavit shall reckon thereafter. List again on 19.11.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 17.9.2018 rd

ITEM NO.67 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 27-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Shubham Paliwal, Adv. Mr. Manoranjan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh P., AOR

Item No.67 -2- For Respondent(s) Mr. Anu K. Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.5472/2018,SLP(C) No. 6051/2018,SLP(C) No.6845/2018, SLP(C) No. 6934/2018,SLP(C) No. 9555/2018, SLP(C) No. 7158/2018, SLP(C) No. 6887/2018,SLP(C) No. 7274/2018, SLP(C) No. 7485/2018, SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 and SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.2 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 and 2 but none has entered appearance. List again on 17.9.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 27.7.2018 rd

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 9555/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 7158/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 (XI-A) SLP(C) No. 7485/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 9283/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) SLP(C) No. 9554/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 01-05-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Manmeet S. Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Rajesh P., AOR

Item No.70 -2- For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 5472/2018,7485/2018,7274/2018,9555/2018 7158/2018,6887/2018,9283/2018 and 9554/2018 Service is complete on respondent Nos.1 and 2 but none has entered appearance. SLP(C) No. 8374/2018 Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.1 and 2. SLP(C) No. 6051/2018 Service is complete on respondent No.1 but none has entered appearance. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.2 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) No. 8175/2018 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent Nos.1 and 2 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued. SLP(C) No. 6845/2018 and SLP(C) No. 6934/2018 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for service of respondent No.1 within two weeks. Notice thereafter be issued.

Item No.70 -3- Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance. List again on 27.7.2018. KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 01.05.2018 rd

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8374/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 690/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) PREMA SUDHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 13-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.N. Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Bhargavan, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. Tag along with SLP (C) No. 5472/2018. (R. NATARAJAN) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASST.REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 10123/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 1145/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) LEKHA V.S. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45942/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 09-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No.5472/2018. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.15 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 10126/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAAP No. 310/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) HEMA RAJ Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44133/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 09-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh P., AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with SLP (C) No. 5472/2018 (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 10124/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 566/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) K.VALSALA DEVI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43720/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SLP) Date : 06-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh P., AOR Mr. Manoranjan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Diptansu Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. In case any steps are taken for recovery, the petitioner is free to move this Court. Tag with SLP (C) No. 5472 of 2018. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7485/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAAP No. 1119/2009 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) LOKANANDEN (DIED)THROUGH LRS Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) Date : 28-03-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.N. Bhargavan,Adv. Mr. Saurabh Bhargavan,Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. There will be stay of recovery of the compensation already paid in respect of the claims covered by the impugned judgment dated 13.10.2017. Tag with SLP (C) No.5472/2018. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.4 & 30 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7158/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 484/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) KUMARI SANTHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) WITH SLP(C) No. 7274/2018 (XI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) SLP(C) No. 6887/2018 (XI-A) Date : 26-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.N. Bhargavan,Adv. Mr. S. Bhargavan,Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice. There will be stay of recovery of the compensation already paid in respect of the claims covered by the impugned judgment dated 13.10.2017. Tag with SLP (C) No. 5472/2018. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.23 + 60 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6845/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 732/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) KUMARI JAYANTHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) with Diary No. 7777 of 2018 SLP (C) No. 6934 of 2018 Date : 23-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. N. Bhargava, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Bhargava, Adv. Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR Mr. Khoda Apa, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. In case any steps are taken for recovery, the petitioners are free to move this Court. Tag with SLP (C) No. 5472 of 2018. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.18 & 68 COURT NO.5 SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5472/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 31/2010 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) PUSHPA SADASIVAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) WITH SLP (C) No.6051/2018 Date : 12-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.S. Rajan,Sr.Adv. Mr. K.N. Bhargavan,Adv. Mr. V.K. Sidharthan,Adv. Mr. Khoda Apa,Adv. Mr. Rajesh P., AOR (N.P.) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in SLP (C) No.5472/2018, seeking adjournment. Issue notice. In case any steps are taken for recovery, the petitioners are free to move this Court. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.68 COURT NO.5 SECTION S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6051/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2017 in LAA No. 257/2009 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) T.PADMAKUMARI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Respondent(s) ([ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 18 I.E. SLP(C)NO.5472/2018 ]) Date : 12-03-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. K. Sidharthan, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 9816/2011 PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 16/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter falls under the complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar

æ ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Civil Appeal No(s). 9816/2011 PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 16/09/2014 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. C. N. Sree Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. M.F. Philip, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The matter falls under the complete category. Registry to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) RegistrarSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byRupam DhamijaDate: 2014.09.1717:04:07 ISTReason:

ITEM NO.36 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 13309/2011(From the judgement and order dated 10/01/2011 in LAAPPNo.1872/2008 of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA & ANR Respondent(s)With I.A.1 (C/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 04/11/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner says that in respect of similar acquisition made vide Notification dated 4.2.1999, the High Court had reduced the compensation to Rs.2,25,000/- per Are but in the petitioner's case the amount has been reduced to Rs.1,32,865/- per Are. The report of the Registry shows that Special Leave Petition (C) No.30395/2009 filed against the reduction of compensation to Rs.2,25,000/- per Are was dismissed by this Court on 5.1.2010. Learned counsel says that the petitioners in that case have filed review petition. - 2 - Be that as it may, as the compensation has beenreduced in the case of the petitioner toRs.1,32,865/- per Are, we feel that the issue wouldrequire consideration. Delay condoned. Leave granted. (Neetu Sachdeva) (Phoolan Wati Arora) Sr. P. A. Court Master

1ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.7 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2011 CC 13309/2011(From the judgement and order(s) in LAAPP No. 1872/2008 dated10-JAN-11 an of The HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM)PRASANNA KUMARI AMMA Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF KERALA & ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report )Date: 23/08/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARJIT SINGH BEDI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. C.N. Sree Kumar,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R 2 Four weeks' time granted for filingadditional documents, as prayed for.[SUMAN WAHDWA] [VINOD KULVI] COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India