ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5611/2013 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2012 in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 8286/2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BUDEL SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 31/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Lal Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. V. Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Karan Khanna, Adv. Mr. Aniket Bhattacharya, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the impugned order passed by the High Court does not call for any interference. However, in the other case, where the proceedings are going on before the Trial Court, the Trial Court shall decide the same without being influenced by any of the observations made by the High Court in the impugned order. With these observations, the special leave petition is dismissed. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master
\200ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5611/2013(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22/11/2012in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 8286/2012 passed by the HighCourt of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior)STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBUDEL SINGH & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)Date : 31/03/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Petitioner(s) Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv.Mr. C. D. Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal, Adv.Mr. Lal Pratap Singh, Adv.Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh, Adv.Ms. V. Nagpal, Adv.Mr. Karan Khanna, Adv.Mr. Aniket Bhattacharya, Adv.Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAfter hearing learned counsel for the parties, we areof the opinion that the impugned order passed by the HighCourt does not call for any interference. However, in theother case, where the proceedings are going on before theTrial Court, the Trial Court shall decide the same withoutbeing influenced by any of the observations made by the HighCourt in the impugned order.With these observations, the special leave petition isdismissed. (Nidhi Ahuja) (Mala Kumari Sharma) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5611/2013 (From the judgment and order dated 22/11/2012 in MCC No. 8286/2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior) STATE OF M.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BUDELSINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 14/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr. Sylona Mohapatra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A.P. Jain,Adv. Mr. Lal Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh,Adv. For Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondents, counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. List the matter after eight weeks. In the meantime, implementation of the impugned judgment is stayed. Trial Court is directed to proceed with the matter but no final order shall be passed without permission of this court. (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar
SECTION IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRL.) NO. 5611 OF 2013 STATE OF M.P. & ORS. ...PETITIONERS VERSUS BUDELSINGH & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 5 th July, 2013, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Delay cononded. Issue notice. ” Accordingly show cause notice was issued to both respondent s through registered A.D post. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both respondents. Service of show cause notice is complete. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED this the 11 th Day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR copy to: 1. Mr. C.D. Singh, Advocate 2. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR c2/hs
\210 ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5611/2013 (From the judgment and order dated 22/11/2012 in MCC No. 8286/2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior) STATE OF M.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BUDELSINGH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date : 14/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr. Sylona Mohapatra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A.P. Jain,Adv. Mr. Lal Pratap Singh,Adv. Mr. Umesh Pratap Singh,Adv. For Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondents, counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. List the matter after eight weeks. In the meantime, implementation of the impugned judgment is stayed. Trial Court is directed to proceed with the matter but no final order shall be passedSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by without permission of this court.Sarita PurohitDate: 2015.12.1517:21:22 ISTReason: (Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar
\204ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2013 CRLMP.NO(s). 11890(From the judgment and ordes dated 22/11/2012 in MCC NO.8286/2012OF THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR)STATE OF M.P. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUSBUDELSINGH & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln. for c/delay in filing SLP & c/delay in refiling SLP, exemptionfrom filing OT))Date: 05/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K SIKRIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. C.D. Singh,Adv. Mr.Sakshi Kakkar, Adv. Mr.Souvigya Awasthi, Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Delay condoned. Issue notice. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master