Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2020 / Diary 10116

MEHMOOD KHAN v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10116/2020

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

08-03-2022

Bench

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Petitioner

MEHMOOD KHAN

Respondent

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 PDF 5 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

ITEM NO.35 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Criminal Appeal No(s). 1217/2021 MEHMOOD KHAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) Date : 08-03-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Susheel Tomar,Adv. Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Records have been received. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. In the meantime, Ld. Counsel for appearing parties may file Additional documents. SAURABH PARTAP SINGH LALER Registrar MG

ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Criminal Appeal No(s). 1217/2021 MEHMOOD KHAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) Date : 10-02-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Await records. List again on 15.03.2022. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Registrar pm

ITEM NO.12 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Criminal Appeal No(s). 1217/2021 MEHMOOD KHAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) Date : 06-01-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Varum Mohan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following O R D E R Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the sole respondent. Issue reminder to concerned Courts for remitting original records. List again on 10.02.2022. VINOD SINGH RAWAT Registrar pm

pm

SLP(Crl.)No.4434/20 1 ITEM NO.26 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).4434/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-03-2019 in CRLA No.1376/2008 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Indore) MEHMOOD KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) Date : 08-10-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR(SCLSC) Ms. Vidushi Garg, Adv. Ms. Vithika Garg, Adv. Mr. Ratneshwar Das, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Veer Vikrant Singh, DAG Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. The petitioner has filed this petition against the fina1 judgment and order dated 12.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in Criminal Appeal No.1376 of 2008 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed his Criminal Appeal, confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh (Biaora)in Sessions Case No. 22 of 2007 dated 21.11.2008. Vide order dated 16.09.2020, notice was issued limited to the quantum of sentence only. ……...2/-

SLP(Crl.)No.4434/20 2 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as also the learned Deputy Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent – State. Leave granted. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances of the instant case and keeping in view the fact that the appellant has suffered incarceration for a period of more than 11 years, we are inclined to grant him bail. The appellant is, accordingly, directed to be enlarged on bail on terms and conditions to be imposed by the trial court. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.9 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) ………...Diary No(s).10116/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-03-2019 in CRLA No.1376/2008 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Indore) MEHMOOD KHAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66004/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.66006/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.66005/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 16-09-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Delay condoned. The application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment as also the application for exemption from filing official translation of Annexure P-1 are allowed in terms of the prayer made. Issue notice limited to the quantum of sentence only. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. (RAJ RANI NEGI) (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) DEPUTY REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India