Home / Supreme Court / Judgments / 2020 / Diary 10078

UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Supreme Court of India | Diary 10078/2020

Status

ROP - of Main Case

Decided On

20-10-2021

Bench

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Petitioner

UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA

Respondent

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Primary Holding

SKIP:model_skip

PDF 1 PDF 2 PDF 3 PDF 4 Check another SC case

Full Judgment Text

1 ITEM NO.25       Court 1 (Video Conferencing)          SECTION II­B                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)  No.4124/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated  14­02­2020 in CRMA No. 21144/2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA              Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT                               Respondent(s) (IA No. 109120/2020 ­ PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES)   Date : 20­10­2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv.                     Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR      Mr. Abu Bakr Sabbaq, Adv.               For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Ms. Aastha Mehta, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Adv.                     Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Having heard learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Solicitor General appearing for the State of Gujarat and carefully perusing the material available on record, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is reported to be in custody since 25­10­2017 and long

2 pendency of trial, we direct the concerned Trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of communication of a copy of this Order, by sitting two days in a week, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. With the aforesaid observations, the Special Leave Petition and pending application are disposed of.   (VISHAL ANAND)                                  (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                           COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.12      Court 1 (Video Conferencing)          SECTION II­B                S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)  No.4124/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated  14­02­2020 in CRMA No. 21144/2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA              Petitioner(s)                                 VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT                               Respondent(s) (IA No. 109120/2020 ­ PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES)   Date : 05­10­2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM :           HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv.                     Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR      Mr. Zahid Hussain, Adv. Mr. Abu Bakr Sabbaq, Adv.               For Respondent(s)                     Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following                              O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. At the commencement of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – State of Gujarat submits that he has received instructions in the matter and prays that time may be granted to him to file counter affidavit. List the matter after Dussehra Holidays. In the meantime, let the counter affidavit be filed in the matter.   (VISHAL ANAND)                                  (R.S. NARAYANAN) ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                           COURT MASTER (NSH)

ITEM NO.8 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).4124/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2020 in CRMA No.21144/2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s) IA No.94277/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No.85508/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. Date : 28-10-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr.Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR Mr. Karthik Murukutala, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner. The applications for exemption from filing official translation of annexures are allowed. Issue notice. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RAJ RANI NEGI) DEPUTY REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.8 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).4124/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2020 in CRMA No.21144/2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) UBED AHMED @ UBAID MIRZA @ OBED MIRZA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.85508/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date : 10-09-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr.Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed, AOR Mr. Kartik Murukutala, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking an adjournment of two weeks to place on record the statement of the PWs, list the matter after two weeks. (RAJ RANI NEGI) (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status

Check case status for High Courts across India