ÎITEM NO.11 COURT NO.9 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 8025/2012(From the judgement and order dated 08/07/2011 in WPNo.9483/2009,LPA No.25895/2010CA No.105/2011 of The HIGH COURT OFBOMBAY)NANU ALGAR NAIDU Petitioner(s) VERSUSMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGL.DEV.AUTH.& ORS Respondent(s)IA NO.1(c/delay in filing SLP)Date: 08/05/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Shakeel Ahmed,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusal of the record, we are of the opinion that no case for interference is made out against the impugned order passed by the High Court. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. (A.D. Sharma) (S.S.R. Krishna) Court Master Court Master
NANU ALGAR NAIDU v. MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGL.DEV.AUTH.
Supreme Court of India | Diary 10060/2012
Status
ROP - of Main Case
Decided On
08-05-2012
Bench
Petitioner
NANU ALGAR NAIDU
Respondent
MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGL.DEV.AUTH.
Primary Holding
SKIP:model_skip