ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6250/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/03/2012 in LAA No. 86/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RAJINDER SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 04/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishun B. Saharya, Adv. Mr.Viresh B. Saharya, Adv. For M/s Saharya & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11176 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6250 of 2014) Rajinder Singh (D) Th. Lrs. & Ors. Appellants VERSUS U.O.I & Anr. Respondents O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants, that the High Court, in his appeal, i.e., L.A.A No.86 of 2012, had enhanced the compensation granted by the Reference Court and the said amount has been further enhanced by this Court in Civil Appeal No.2091 of 2014. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No.2091 of 2014. There shall be no order as to costs. ................,J. (Dipak Misra) ................,J. (Uday Umesh Lalit) New Delhi; December 04, 2014
LISTED ON: 04.12.2014 BEFORE COURT NO. ITEM NO. SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) No. 6250, 8571, 12700, 12701, 12702, 718, 719, 20812, 20814-815, 20844-48, 20831, 23029-32, 6954-71 6972-73, 6974, 30839, 30840, 30841, 30842, 31613, 31614, 31617, 16259, 16260, 19303-08, 19310, 10085, 29089, 29090, 29092, 29094, 29096, 29098, 29101, 29102, 29103, 29105, 29106, 27234-85/2014, CC Nos. 19507, 19709, 19414/2014 AND C.A No. 365/2013 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP in SLP(C) No. 6250/2014, 8571/2014, 12700/2014, 12701/2014, 12702/2014, 718/2014, 719/2014, 20831, 29089, 29090, 29092, 29094, 29096, 29098, 29101, 29102, 29103, 29105 and 29106 AND 6974/2014) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1 & 2 (Application for condonation of delay in filing and refiling SLP in SLP(C) No. 20812/2014, 6972-73/2014) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 3-4 AND 5-6 (Application for substitution to bringing on record the Lrs of deceased petitioner and condonation of delay in filing substitution in SLP(C) Nos. 20814-815/2014) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 6-10 AND 11-15 (Application for substitution and condonation of delay in filing substitution in SLP(C) Nos. 20844-48/2014) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1 to 4 AND 5-8 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling of SLP in SLP(C) No. 23029-32/2014) AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 1-15 AND 16-33 (Applications for condonation of delay in filing and refiling of SLP in SLP(C) No. 69954-71/2014) RAJINDER SINGH(D) THR. LRS. & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS U.O.I. & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT It is submitted that the above matters are covered by the ..2/- ..2..
decision of this Hon’ble Court dated 13.02.2014 in Civil Appeal No. 2091 of 2014 etc. etc. with regard to land acquired of Villages Bharthal, Bijwasan, Pochanpur and Dhul Saras. (Copy of Court’s Order dated 13.02.2014 is enclosed herewith). It is further submitted that in all the matters, Land Acquisition Collector and Delhi Development Authority are respondents and both have been served in some matters and are represented by Ms. Rachana Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates respectively. Service position of each matter is as under:- SLP(C) No. 6250/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 24.02.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 05.03.2014 by regd. A.D. Ms. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents. They have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) Nos. 8571, 12700, 12701 and 12702/2014:- It is submitted that there are 2 respondents in these matters. Pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 24.03.2014 and 02.05.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 01.04.2014 and 21.05.2014 by regd. A.D. Ms. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents. They have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP(C) Nos. 718 and 719/2014:- It is submitted that there are 2 respondents in both the matters. Pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 06.01.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 05.04.2014 by regd. A.D. Ms. Rachna Srivastava and Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents. Counsel appearing for ..3/-
..3.. respondent No. 2 has filed counter affidavits in both the matters and the same has been included in respective SLP paper books. Service is complete. SLP(C) No. 20812/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 01.08.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 19.08.2014 by regd. A.D. M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 but he has not filed counter affidavit. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received in respect of respondent No. 1 so far. Service is not complete in respect of respondent No. 1. SLP(C) Nos. 20814-815/2014 and 20844-48/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 01.08.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents in both the matters was issued ON 08.08.2014 by regd. A.D. Mrs. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocate have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents in SLP(C) No. 20814-15/2014 but they have not filed counter affidavit. No one has entered vakalatnama/appearance in SLP(C) No. 20844-848/2014 so far. Service is complete in SLP(C) No. 20814-15/2014 only. SLP(C) No. 20831/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 21.07.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued ON 08.08.2014 by regd. A.D. Mrs. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocate have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents but they have not filed counter affidavit. Service is complete. SLP(C) Nos. 23029-32/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 19.08.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 04.09.2014 by regd. A.D. Mrs. Rachna Srivastava ..4/-
..4.. and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) Nos. 6954-71 6972-73 and 6974/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 03.03.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 07.03.2014 by regd. A.D. Mrs. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates have filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of both the respondents but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete in all the matters. SLP(C) Nos. 30839, 30840, 30841 and 30842/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 10.11.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents (common in the matters) was issued on 24.11.2014 by regd. A.D. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received from them. Service is not complete. SLP(C) Nos. 31613, 31614 and 31617/2014:- The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.11.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ Notice. Tag with SLP(C) No. 29089 of 2014.” It is submitted that pursuant to aforesaid Order, show cause notice to both the respondents (common respondents) was issued on 28.11.2014, 27.11.2014 and 25.11.2014. by regd. A.D. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received so far. Service is not complete. SLP(C) No. 16259/2014:- It is submitted that there are 2 respondents in this matter. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Mrs. Rachna ..5/-
..5.. Srivastava, Advocate and respondent No. 2 is represented by M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) No. 16260/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 02.07.2014, show cause notice to all the 4 respondents was issued on 15.07.2014 by regd. A.D. respondent No. 1 is represented by Mrs. Rachna Srivastava and respondent No. 2 is represented by M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover has been received from respondent No. 3 and 4. Service is not complete in on respondent Nos. 3 and 4. SLP(C) Nos. 19303-08/2014:- It is submitted that there are 2 common respodnents in these matters. Respondent No. 1 is represented by Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate and respondent No. 2 is represented by M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocates but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) No. 19310/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 21.07.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 07.08.2014 by regd. A.D. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of respondent No. 1 but has not filed counter affidavit so far. A.D. card duly signed has been received from respondent No. 2 but no one has entered appearance so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) No. 10085/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 07.04.2014, show cause notice to both the respondents was issued on 19.04.2014 by regd. A.D. respondent No.s 1 and 2 are represented by Ms. Rachna Srivastava and M/s. Saharaya & ..6/-
..6.. Co., Advocates, but they have not filed counter affidavit so far. Service is complete. SLP(C) Nos. 29089, 29090, 29092, 29094, 29096, 29098, 29101, 29102, 29103, 29105 and 29106/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 13.10.2014, show cause notice was issued to both the respondents (common in all) on 20.11.2014 by regd. A.D. Service of show cause notice is awaited on both the respondnts. SLP(C) No. 27234-85/2014:- It is submitted that pursuant to Hon’ble Court’s Order dated 07.11.2014, show cause notice was issued to both the respondents on 20.11.2014 by regd. A.D. Service of show cause notice is awaited on both the respondents. CC No. 19507/2014:- It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.01.2012 modified vide order dated 12.01.2012 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.A. App No. 768 of 2010 alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing SLP (barred by time by 947 days) and the same has been included in SLP paper books. It is lastly submitted that CC Nos. 19414/2014, 19709/2014 and 19507/2014 have been tagged together as all are arising out of common followed judgment. CC No. 19709/2014:- It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.01.2012 modified vide order dated 12.01.2012 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.A. App No. 554 of 2011 alongwith application for condonation of delay ..7/-
..7.. in filing SLP (barred by time by 947 days) and the same has been included in SLP paper books. CC No. 19414/2014:- It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that the instant matter has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 01.02.2012 of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.A. App No. 32 of 2012 alongwith application for condonation of delay in filing SLP (barred by time by 927 days) and the same has been included in SLP paper books. It is further submitted that C.A. No. 2091/2014 arising out of common followed judgment was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 13.02.2014, when the Court was pleased to dispose of the same. Copy of order dated 13.02.2014 is enclosed herewith. It is further submitted that SLP(C) Nos. 23029-32/2014 was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 19.08.2014, when the Court was pleased to direct issue of notice. Copy of order dated 19.08.2014 is enclosed herewith. It is submitted for the information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioner was required to file copy of order dated 09.12.2002. In this regard, he has given a letter dated 19 th November, 2014 and the same has been placed at Page No. 78 of SLP paper books. C.A No. 365/2013: It is submitted that there are 2 respondents in this appeal. Service of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal is complete on both the respondents. Respondent No. 2 is represented by M/s. Saharya & Co., Advocate. Certificate of service has been received from the High Court in respect of respondent No. 1 but no one has entered appearance so far. It is further submitted that Original record has been received from the High Court but counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case so far in C.A. No. 365/2013. ..8/-
..8.. The matters above mentioned alongwith applications are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this Office Report for appropriate Orders. DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Ch. No. 22 Mr. Devvrat, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Shreepal Singh, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. K. S. Rana, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Abhinash kumar Misra, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Balraj Dewan, Adv. Ch. No. Ms. N. Shobha, Adv. Ch. No. Mr. Bankey Bihari, Adv. Ch. No. 477, Delhi High Court Mr. Dev Prakash Bhardwaj, Adv. Ch. No. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. Ch. No. 139 Ms. Saharya & Co., Adv. Ch. No. 28 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
Þ ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6250/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/03/2012 in LAA No. 86/2012 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi) RAJINDER SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I & ANR Respondent(s) Date : 04/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vishun B. Saharya, Adv. Mr.Viresh B. Saharya, Adv. For M/s Saharya & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by (Signed order is placed on the file)Gulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2014.12.1714:32:51 ISTReason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11176 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6250 of 2014)Rajinder Singh (D) Th. Lrs. & Ors. Appellants VERSUSU.O.I & Anr. Respondents
O R D E R Delay condoned. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted by Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counselfor the appellants, that the High Court, in his appeal, i.e.,L.A.A No.86 of 2012, had enhanced the compensation granted by theReference Court and the said amount has been further enhanced bythis Court in Civil Appeal No.2091 of 2014. In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of interms of the order passed by this Court in Civil Appeal No.2091 of2014. There shall be no order as to costs. ................,J. (Dipak Misra) ................,J. (Uday Umesh Lalit)New Delhi;December 04, 2014
ITEM NO.88 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PANKAJ BHANDARI Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6250/2014 RAJINDER SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 29/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Vishnu B. Saharya, Adv. M/s Saharya & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the proof of service of pleadings on respondent No.1 within two weeks. Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to the learned counsel for respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit. List again on 4.12.2014. (PANKAJ BHANDARI) Registrar
LISTED ON 29.10.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 88 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 6250/2014 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) RAJINDER SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 30.07.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ Two weeks’ time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing vakalatnama. Upon filing of the vakalatnama, the learned counsel for the petitioner to supply complete set of the pleadings to respondent No. 1. Four weeks’ time is granted to respondent No.2 for filing counter affidavit. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that he has received the complete set of the pleadings. List again on 28.10.2014 .” It is submitted that as directed above, counsel for the petitioners has not filed proof of pleadings on the counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 so far. No counter affidavit has been filed by the counsel appearing for both the respondents so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 28 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 . ASSISTANT REGISTRAR COPY TO: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocate Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate M/S Sahayra & Co., Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
LISTED ON 30.07.2014 BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO. 1 ITEM NO. 83 SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 6250/2014 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing SLP) RAJINDER SINGH (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar on 23.04.2014, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:- “ On behalf of respondent No.1, notice has been accepted by the learned Advocate, Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, appearing on behalf of Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record, who has undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by the next date. Complete set of the pleadings be served on the learned counsel within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record within a week and thereafter counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Respondent No.2 is granted six weeks' time for filing counter affidavit on record subject to service of the complete set of the pleadings on the learned counsel appearing on their behalf within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record within a week. List again on 30.7.2014.” It is submitted that as directed above, counsel for the petitioners has not filed proof of pleadings on the counsel for both the respondents so far. Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate has neither filed Vakalatnama/Appearance nor counter affidaivt on behalf of respondent No. 1 so far. No counter affidavit has been filed by the counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 so far. The matter above mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF February, 2014 . ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO: Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocate Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate M/S Sahayra & Co., Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR P-1
tITEM NO.110 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6250/2014RAJINDER SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUSU.O.I & ANR Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 23/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. M/S Saharya & Co. ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On behalf of respondent No.1, notice has beenaccepted by the learned Advocate, Mr. Utkarsh Sharma,appearing on behalf of Ms. Rachna Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record, who has undertaken to file vakalatnama and counteraffidavit by the next date. Complete set of the pleadings beserved on the learned counsel within two weeks of whichnecessary proof be filed on record within a week andthereafter counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. Respondent No.2 is granted six weeks' time forfiling counter affidavit on record subject to service of theItem No.110 -2-complete set of the pleadings on the learned counsel appearingon their behalf within two weeks of which necessary proof befiled on record within a week. List again on 30.7.2014. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARrd
\212 ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2014 CC 2992/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 29/03/2012 in LAA No.86/2012, of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) RAJINDER SINGH(D) TH. LRS & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I & ANR Respondent(s) WITH I.A. 1 (C/Delay in filing SLP and office report) Date: 24/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Adv. Mr. S.K. Rout, Adv. Mr. Sukhda Dhamija, Adv. Ms. Dimple Dhamija, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as on the special leave petition. Notice be served on Ms. Rachana Srivastava, learned counsel. | [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] ||Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |