STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. KAWARSINGH KISHANSINGH BAINANDE

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1257-1259 OF 2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012 AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012 O R D E R Criminal Appeal Nos. 1257-1259 OF 2012: 1) We have heard Mr. Anand Landge, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-Complainant, Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, learned counsel appearing for the respondent – State of Maharashtra and Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-accused. 2) These appeals have been filed by the original Complainant, challenging the common impugned judgment and order dated 20.07.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, whereby the High Court dismissed the prayer of the Complainant for enhancement of sentence to accused Nos. 1 to 4 and directed compensation of Rs.10,000/- to be paid to her. The High

2 Court by the impugned judgment dismissed the appeal insofar as accused No.1 is concerned and allowed the appeals filed by the accused Nos. 2 to 4 and acquitted them of the offences with which they were charged and convicted. 3) After hearing the contentions of learned counsel appearing for the parties and carefully perusing the material available on record and after carefully going through the judgments of the trial Court as well as the High Court, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court, insofar as it relates to the Complainant's prayer seeking enhancement of sentence and compensation. 4) In view of that, we find no merit in the criminal appeals filed by the Complainant and the same are dismissed. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012: 5) The appellant (Kawarsingh Kisansingh Bainade-accused No.1), in this appeal, has come before this Court challenging the order passed by the High Court whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by him confirming the conviction and sentence. However, the High Court altered the conviction of the appellant from Section 302 read with Section 34 to Section 302 of the IPC simpliciter. 6) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal should be allowed on the ground that the very foundation of acquitting the other accused in the matters in question taking into account the evidence of P.Ws 11 and 12, who were claiming to be the only eye-witnesses to the incident in question, have been

3 discarded by the Court. 7) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, and after going through the material available on record, in particular, the evidence of P.Ws. 11 and 12, in our considered opinion, this evidence cannot stand in the way to acquit the appellant in this appeal. As can be seen, the very foundation of the case, as relied upon by the prosecution, has failed. The evidence which has been placed before this Court and the documents show that none of the documents or the evidence can go against the appellant. Since the case rests on the circumstantial evidence and the chain of such circumstances having already broken, we do not find that any case has been made out against the appellant-herein. 8) Therefore, in our considered opinion, the judgment passed by the High Court is not sustainable in the eyes of law and the evidence adduced by the prosecution in support of its case cannot be said to be reliable. 9) In these circumstances, we feel that the High Court has erred in holding the appellant as an accused in the matter and the benefit of doubt has to be given to him. 10) Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order passed by the High Court and allow the appeal 11) Since the appellant is on bail, his bail bonds shall stand discharged.

4 CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012: 12) Since the appeals filed by the Complainant have already been dismissed by us, these appeals which were preferred by the State of Maharashtra against the same common judgment of the High Court also stands dismissed. ......................J (PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE) ......................J NEW DELHI; (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ) February 02, 2017.

5 ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 02/02/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN Counsel for parties:Mr. Anand Langde, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Nilesh Ghanekar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Surabhi Guleria, Adv. Ms. Pushpa Devi Sikri, Adv. Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Criminal Appeal Nos. 1257-1259 OF 2012: The criminal appeals filed by the Complainant are dismissed in terms of the signed order.

6 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012: The appeal is allowed and the impugned order passed by the High Court is set aside in terms of the signed order. Since the appellant is on bail, his bail bonds shall stand discharged. CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012: Since the appeals filed by the Complainant have already been dismissed, these appeals which were preferred by the State of Maharashtra against the same common judgment of the High Court also stands dismissed in terms of the signed order. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master (Common signed order is placed on the file)

x61IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1257-1259 OF 2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012O R D E RCriminal Appeal Nos. 1257-1259 OF 2012:1) We have heard Mr. Anand Landge, learned Counsel appearing forthe appellant-Complainant, Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, learned counselappearing for the respondent â¬ State of Maharashtra and Mr.Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, learned counsel appearing for therespondent-accused. 2) These appeals have been filed by the original Complainant,challenging the common impugned judgment and order dated20.07.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Benchat Aurangabad, whereby the High Court dismissed the prayer of theComplainant for enhancement of sentence to accused Nos. 1 to 4 anddirected compensation of Rs.10,000/- to be paid to her. The High2Court by the impugned judgment dismissed the appeal insofar asaccused No.1 is concerned and allowed the appeals filed by theaccused Nos. 2 to 4 and acquitted them of the offences with whichthey were charged and convicted.3) After hearing the contentions of learned counsel appearing forthe parties and carefully perusing the material available onrecord and after carefully going through the judgments of thetrial Court as well as the High Court, we do not find any reasonto interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court,insofar as it relates to the Complainant's prayer seekingenhancement of sentence and compensation. 4) In view of that, we find no merit in the criminal appealsfiled by the Complainant and the same are dismissed.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012:5) The appellant (Kawarsingh Kisansingh Bainade-accused No.1), inthis appeal, has come before this Court challenging the orderpassed by the High Court whereby the High Court dismissed theappeal filed by him confirming the conviction and sentence.However, the High Court altered the conviction of the appellantfrom Section 302 read with Section 34 to Section 302 of the IPCsimpliciter.6) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appealshould be allowed on the ground that the very foundation ofacquitting the other accused in the matters in question takinginto account the evidence of P.Ws 11 and 12, who were claiming tobe the only eye-witnesses to the incident in question, have been3discarded by the Court.7) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, and aftergoing through the material available on record, in particular, theevidence of P.Ws. 11 and 12, in our considered opinion, thisevidence cannot stand in the way to acquit the appellant in thisappeal. As can be seen, the very foundation of the case, asrelied upon by the prosecution, has failed. The evidence whichhas been placed before this Court and the documents show that noneof the documents or the evidence can go against the appellant.Since the case rests on the circumstantial evidence and the chainof such circumstances having already broken, we do not find thatany case has been made out against the appellant-herein. 8) Therefore, in our considered opinion, the judgment passed bythe High Court is not sustainable in the eyes of law and theevidence adduced by the prosecution in support of its case cannot

be said to be reliable.9) In these circumstances, we feel that the High Court has erredin holding the appellant as an accused in the matter and thebenefit of doubt has to be given to him. 10) Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order passed by theHigh Court and allow the appeal 11) Since the appellant is on bail, his bail bonds shall standdischarged.4CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012:12) Since the appeals filed by the Complainant have already beendismissed by us, these appeals which were preferred by the Stateof Maharashtra against the same common judgment of the High Courtalso stands dismissed. ......................J(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)......................JNEW DELHI; (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN )February 02, 2017.5ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date : 02/02/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANCounsel for parties:Mr. Anand Langde, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.Mr. Nilesh Ghanekar, Adv.Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv.Surabhi Guleria, Adv.Ms. Pushpa Devi Sikri, Adv.Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Criminal Appeal Nos. 1257-1259 OF 2012:The criminal appeals filed by the Complainant are dismissedin terms of the signed order.6CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012:The appeal is allowed and the impugned order passed by theHigh Court is set aside in terms of the signed order.Since the appellant is on bail, his bail bonds shall standdischarged.CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1261-1264 OF 2012:Since the appeals filed by the Complainant have already beendismissed, these appeals which were preferred by the State ofMaharashtra against the same common judgment of the High Courtalso stands dismissed in terms of the signed order. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)

Court Master Court Master(Common signed order is placed on the file)

ITEM NO.110 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date: 01/12/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,A Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list the matters next week. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be granted in the matters under any circumstance. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

îITEM NO.110 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln.(s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date: 01/12/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITFor Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,A Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs prayed, list the matters next week.It is made clear that no further adjournment will be grantedin the matters under any circumstance.(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date: 17/11/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl.Govt. Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl.Govt.Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeking short adjournment on the ground that learned Senior counsel who has to argue the matters is not available today, list the Criminal Appeals on Thursday, the 24 th November, 2016. It is made clear to the learned counsel that no further adjournment will be granted in the matters under any circumstance. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ðITEM NO.108 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date: 17/11/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANFor Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl.Govt. Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Addl.Govt.Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E ROn the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for theappellants seeking short adjournment on the ground that learnedSenior counsel who has to argue the matters is not availabletoday, list the Criminal Appeals on Thursday, the 24 th November,2016. It is made clear to the learned counsel that no furtheradjournment will be granted in the matters under any circumstance.(VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 20/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN Counsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ÌITEM NO.103 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date : 20/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANCounsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv.Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AORMr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R List after two weeks. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.113 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 19/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN Counsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. (NP) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.(NP) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.(NP) T he Court made the following O R D E R None appears. Not today. (SWETA DHYANI) (SHAKTI PARKASH SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

jITEM NO.113 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date : 19/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANCounsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. (NP) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.(NP) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.(NP) T he Court made the following O R D E RNone appears. Not today. (SWETA DHYANI) (SHAKTI PARKASH SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 22/09/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Counsel for parties Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As requested by the learned counsel for the appellants, the matters stand adjourned for the day. (SWETA DHYANI) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

\220ITEM NO.102 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report) Date : 22/09/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYCounsel for parties Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs requested by the learned counsel for the appellants,the matters stand adjourned for the day. (SWETA DHYANI) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) SR.P.A. COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.112 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 24/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For the parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra, list on Wednesday, the 7 th September, 2016. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

¼ITEM NO.112 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report)Date : 24/08/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor the parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AORMr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the Stateof Maharashtra, list on Wednesday, the 7 th September, 2016. (R. NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 28/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Guleria, Adv. Mr. Kailas B. Autade, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Kailas B. Autade, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Guleria, Adv. ...2/-

-2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed for, list these matters after two weeks. [SNEH LATA SHARMA] [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

:ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCriminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)WITHCrl.A. No. 1260/2012(With Office Report)Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012(With Office Report)Date : 28/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROYFor Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Guleria, Adv. Mr. Kailas B. Autade, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Kailas B. Autade, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Guleria, Adv....2/--2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RAs prayed for, list these matters after two weeks. [SNEH LATA SHARMA] [ SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

ITEM NO.117 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH (Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (Office Report) Date : 13/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Counsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Kunal A. Cheema, Adv. Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State, the matters are adjourned for two weeks. (R.NATARAJAN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) Court Master Court Master

Æ ITEM NO.117 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH (Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (Office Report) Date : 13/07/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY Counsel for parties Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Kunal A. Cheema, Adv. Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State, the matters are adjourned for two weeks.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byR.NATARAJANDate: 2016.07.1612:55:49 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) Court Master Court Master

SEC. IIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 12571259, 1260 & 12611264 OF 2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC. ETC. ...APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 8 th December, 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ As prayed by learned counsel appearing for the accusedrespondents, as a last chance, list after Christmas Holidays. ” It is submitted that counsel for the accused respondent has not filed any documents. It is further submitted that Service of Notice of Lodgement of Petition of Appeal is complete in all the matters. It is submitted that Original Record of High Court as well as Trial Court has been received in all matters and the same are available in Court room for reference. The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report. DATED this the 2 nd Day of February, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. Mr. S. S. Choudhari, Adv. Mr. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. A. P. Mayee, Adv. C2/hs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 08/12/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by learned counsel appearing for the accused-respondents, as a last chance, list after Christmas Holidays. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

& ITEM NO.111 COURT NO.12 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 08/12/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by learned counsel appearing for the accused-respondents, as a last chance, list after ChristmasSignature Not Verified Holidays.Digitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.12.0816:45:31 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.112 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 18/11/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant in Crl. A. No. 1260 of 2012, list after two weeks. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

0 ITEM NO.112 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 18/11/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. For Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant in Crl. A. No.Signature Not Verified 1260 of 2012, list after two weeks.Digitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.11.2112:47:17 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 07/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of learned senior counsel for the appellant, list these appeals after Diwali holidays. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

\220 ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 07/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R On the request of learned senior counsel for the appellant,Signature Not Verified list these appeals after Diwali holidays.Digitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.10.0916:48:31 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.118 IN COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 06/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Mr. G. Anand, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Complainant submits that the arguing counsel is not well and prays for an adjournment. In view of the same, the matters are not taken up today. (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ð ITEM NO.118 IN COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. Nos. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 06/10/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Mr. G. Anand, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari, AOR Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Complainant submits that the arguing counsel is not well and prays for an adjournment.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by In view of the same, the matters are not taken up today.Gulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.10.0616:56:50 ISTReason: (R.NATARAJAN) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) Court Master Court Master

ITEM NO.108(MM) COURT NO.11 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 24/09/2015 These appeals though listed for hearing were mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R As prayed, list the Criminal Appeals after one week. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.114 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 17/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing in these matters for the State of Maharashtra candidly submitted before us that he is not ready in the matters today. In view of that, he prays for little time in the matters to make himself ready. On such prayer being made by the learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra, the matters are adjourned for a week. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be granted in the matters. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

¶ ITEM NO.114 COURT NO.13 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1257-1259/2012 RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay and office report) WITH Crl.A. No. 1260/2012 (With Office Report) Crl.A. No. 1261-1264/2012 (With Office Report) Date : 17/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mahaling Pandarge, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel appearing in these matters for the State of Maharashtra candidly submitted before us that he is not ready in the matters today. In view of that, he prays for little time in the matters to make himself ready. On such prayer being made by the learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra, the matters are adjourned for a week.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by It is made clear that no further adjournment will be grantedVishal AnandDate: 2015.09.17 in the matters.15:42:07 EASTReason: (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

\206ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1257-1259 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEEDRANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay)WITH APPEAL(CRL) NO. 1260 of 2012(With office report)APPEAL(CRL) NO. 1261-1264 of 2012(With office report)Date: 07/05/2014 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari, Adv. Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. Mr. A. Selvin Raja, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the parties have failed tofile additional documents within the time granted by theCourt. No further steps required. Registry to process the matter for listing beforethe Hon'ble Court, as per rules. (M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRARrd

´ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1257-1259 OF 2012 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SANJIV JAINRANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for stay)WITH APPEAL(CRL) NO. 1260 of 2012(With office report)APPEAL(CRL) NO. 1261-1264 of 2012(With office report)Date: 26/02/2014 These Appeals were called on for hearing today.For Appellant(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service is complete. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the parties tofile additional documents. List again on 1.5.2014.| | | (SANJIV JAIN) || | |REGISTRAR || | | |rd

¼ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSCRL.MP.NO.9520/2013 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1260 OF 2012KAWARSINGH KISANSINGH BAINADE Appellant (s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)(With appln. for bail and office report)Date: 09/05/2013 This matter was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBALFor Appellant(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. Mr. Vatsalya Vijaya, Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay V. Kharde, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard both sides. After going into all the materials placed, the grievance expressed and also taking note of the fact that the appellant has undergone about 6 years of sentence, we are inclined to consider the claim of the appellant. Therefore, the appellant is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge- 4 at Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.274/2008. The Additional Sessions Judge-4 is free to impose appropriate condition(s) as he deems fit. The Crl.M.P. for bail is disposed of. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master

´ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).8262-8264/2011(From the judgement and order dated 20/07/2011 in CRLA No.72/2010,CRLANo.324/2010CRLA No.105/2011CRLA No.112/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY ATAURANGABAD)RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,issuance of non-bailable war.of arrest,stay,permission to file additional documents and office report)WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 1754-1757 of 2012(With appln. for exemption from filing OT and office report)SLP(Crl) NO. 9880 of 2011(Wit Appln. for bail and exemption from filing C/C of the impugned orderand permission to file additional documents and office report)Date: 17/08/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri,Sr.Adv.in SR 9880/12 Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv. Ms. Rajshri Dubey,Adv. Mr.Sunil Upadhyay,Adv.in SR 8262-64/11 Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv.For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.in SR 8262-64/11 Ms. Rajshri Dubey,Adv. Mr.Sunil Upadhyay,Adv.For Respondent in Mr. Sanjay Kharde,Adv.SR 8262-64/11 & Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair,Adv.SR 9880/11 andPetitioner inSR No. 1754-57/12 ....2/- -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Exemption from filing OT is allowed. Permission to file additional documents is granted. Leave granted. Crl.M.P. for bail in SLP(Crl.)No. 9880 of 2011 is dismissed for the present. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to renew it after sometime.

[Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA Court Master

ÐITEM NO.21 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2012 CRLMP.NO(s). 5251-5254(From the judgement and order dated 20/07/2011 in CRLA No.41/2010,324/2010, 112 and 105 of 2011 of the HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY ATAURANGABAD)STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Petitioner(s) VERSUSKAWARSINGH KISHANSINGH BAINANDE & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)Date: 24/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Manish Pitale, Adv. for Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Tag with Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 8262- 8264 of 2011 (N.S.K. Kamesh) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Court Master

ôITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMASPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).8262-8264/2011RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T.,issuance of non-bailable war. of arrest,stay,permission to file additionaldocuments and office report ))WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 9880 of 2011(With office report)Date: 09/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearingtoday.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Prashant R.Dahat,adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S.ChoudhariFor Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair ,Adv Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File is not received. List the matter on 23.02.2012. (Sunil Thomas) RegistrarSB

hITEM NO.25 COURT NO.7 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2011 CRLMP.NO(s). 23849/2011(From the judgement and order dated 20/07/2011 in CRLANo.41/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD)KAWARSINGH KISANSINGH BAINADE Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report ))Date: 09/12/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. (NP)For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Put up before a Bench of which one of us (Ranjana Prakash Desai, J.) is not a member. (Neetu Khajuria) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Sr.P.A. Court Master

¤ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.8 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2011 CRLMP.NO(s). 18782-18784/2011(From the judgement and order dated 20.7.2011 in CRLA No.72/2010, CRLA No. 324/2010, CRLA No. 105/2011, CRLA No.112/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD)RANJANA KISANSINGH DUMALE ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUSSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,permission to file SLP andoffice report ))Date: 30/09/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure,Adv. Mr. Prashant R.D., Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file special leave petitions is granted. Issue notice. (Neetu Khajuria) (S.S.R. Krishna) Sr.P.A. Court Master

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. KAWARSINGH KISHANSINGH BAINANDE

Full Judgment Text

Search This Case

Supreme Court Resources

High Court Case Status