ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).29116/2012(From the judgement and order dated 20/12/2011 in SBCWP No.10020/2011 ofThe HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR)JODHPUR VIDYT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANOJ SHARMA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With office report )Date: 12/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLAFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Puneet Jain,Adv. Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr. Christi Jain,Adv. Ms. Ruchika Gohil,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our power under Article 136 of the Constitution. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. |(N.K. Goel) | |(Shashi Sareen) ||Court Master | |Court Master |
.ITEM NO.6 Court No.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI.A. No. 1 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012 CC 16882/2012(From the judgement and order dated 20/12/2011 in SBCWP No.10020/2011, ofThe HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR)JODHPUR VIDYT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSMANOJ SHARMA & ANR. Respondent(s)(With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and office report)Date: 24/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN (In Chambers)For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain,Adv.For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A. No. 1 (appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP) is allowed. | (DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) |(M.S. NEGI) || Court Master | Court Master |