ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan ) SR. P.A. COURT MASTER
\216 ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 08/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We find no reason to entertain the special leave petition, which is, accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. (Rajni Mukhi) (Renu Diwan) SR. P.A. COURT MASTERSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byJAYANT KUMAR ARORADate: 2016.07.0911:59:52 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. Put up after four weeks. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.
MATTER FOR :04.12.2015 COURT NO.09 ITEM NO.39 SECTION XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 26599 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.P. TRANSCO LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS D.P. SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 01.10.2015 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “Let fresh notice be issued by ordinary process. Requisite spare copies/process must be filed. ” It is submitted that show cause notice was issued to both the respondents by Regd. AD post on 10.10.2015. But neither AD cards nor unserved covers have been received back so far. It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that service of both the respondents have already been completed through Trial Court as Report regarding service effected on both the respondents received from the District Judge, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Service is complete through trial Court report. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 1st day of December, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. Flat No. 5, P13, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi110017 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4/vv/
^ ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 04/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R No one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. Put up after four weeks. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2015.12.0511:12:34 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 01/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let fresh notice be issued by ordinary process. Requisite spare copies/process must be filed. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court Master
V ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date : 01/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let fresh notice be issued by ordinary process. Requisite spare copies/process must be filed. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Indu Pokhriyal) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2015.10.0117:49:13 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 21/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Hemal Seth, Adv. For Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this matter is adjourned for one week. [INDU POKHRIYAL ] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.
MATTER FOR :21.09.2015 COURT NO.10 ITEM NO.52 SECTION XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 26599 OF 2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.P. TRANSCO LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS D.P. SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 15.09.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order: “ Delay condoned. Issue notice. Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No. 346 of 2013, shall remain stayed.” It is submitted that there are two Respondents. Show cause notice was issued to both Respondents on 3.11.2014 by Regd. AD Post. Neither AD card not unserved cover has been Received back so far. AND the matter was again listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 26.2.2015 when he was pleased to pass the following order: “Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to both the unserved respondents shall be taken by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner within the period provided above. List again on 07.05.2015..” ...2/
2 AND the matter was Lastly listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 26.8.2015 when he was pleased to pass the following order: “The office report indicated that service of notice is complete on the respondents but no one as entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.” It is submitted that accordingly Show cause notice was issued to both the unserved Respondents by Regd. AD Post as well as dasti and through Trial Court on 18.5.2015. Neither AD nor unserved cover has been received back so far. A report from District Judge, Kadapa have been received after effecting service of notice to unserved Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 but no one has entered appearance so far. Counsel for Petitioner has not filed affidavit of dasti service so far. Service is complete by way of trial Court report. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report. Dated this the 2 nd day of September, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. Flat No. 5, P13, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi110017 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
ä ITEM NO.52 COURT NO.10 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No. 346/2013 passed by the High Court Of A.P. At Hyderabad) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 21/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Hemal Seth, Adv. For Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this matter is adjourned for one week. [INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySukhbir Paul KaurDate: 2015.09.2313:53:31 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MG
LISTED ON : 26.08.2015 COURT NO. R2 ITEM NO.68 SECTION XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 26599/2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.P. TRANSCO LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS D.P. SATYAPRAKASH AND ANR. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 07.05.2015, when he was pass the following Order: " Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court. List again on 26.08.2015. " It is submitted that accordingly show cause notice was issued to both the unserved respondents by Regd. A.D post as well as Dasti and through Trial Court on 18.05.2015. Neither A.D nor unserved covered has been received back so far. Service report from District Judge, Kadapa have been received on 16.06.2015 and 16.07.2015 after effecting service of notice to unserved respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively but no one has entered appearance so far. Service is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/lk/OR
LISTED ON : 26.08.2015 COURT NO. R2 ITEM NO.68 SECTION XV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 26599/2014 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF A.P. TRANSCO LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS D.P. SATYAPRAKASH AND ANR. RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter abovementioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 07.05.2015, when he was pass the following Order: " Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court. List again on 26.08.2015. " It is submitted that accordingly show cause notice was issued to both the unserved respondents by Regd. A.D post as well as Dasti and through Trial Court on 18.05.2015. Neither A.D nor unserved covered has been received back so far. Service report from District Judge, Kadapa have been received on 16.06.2015 and 16.07.2015 after effecting service of notice to unserved respondent nos. 1 and 2 respectively but no one has entered appearance so far. Service is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court with this Office Report. Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 2/lk/OR
( ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/08/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that service of notice is complete on the respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. (M K HANJURA) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.08.2714:34:33 SCTReason:
ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Bala Shivudu, Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court. List again on 26.08.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar KP
J ITEM NO.75 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 07/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Bala Shivudu, Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court. List again on 26.08.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar KPSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.05.0906:51:51 CESTReason:
ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.Bala Shivudu,adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to both the unserved respondents shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within the period provided above. List again on 07.05.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SB
T ITEM NO.77 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 26/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.M.Bala Shivudu,adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to both the unserved respondents shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Trial Court, the particulars of which shall be furnished by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within the period provided above. List again on 07.05.2015. (M K HANJURA) Registrar SBSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySushma Kumari BajajDate: 2015.02.2810:50:57 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PRAVEEN KUMAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 12/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Thakur,Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondents. List again on 26.2.2015. (PRAVEEN KUMAR) Registrar MG
\202 ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR PRAVEEN KUMAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26599/2014 A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (with office report) Date : 12/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mahesh Thakur,Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondents. List again on 26.2.2015. (PRAVEEN KUMAR) Registrar MGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2014.12.1312:02:11 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) NO......./2014 CC No.6237/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No.346/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 15/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No.346 of 2013, shall remain stayed. (SANJAY KUMAR) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
\214 ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) NO......./2014 CC No.6237/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29/10/2013 in WA No.346/2013 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh) A.P TRANSCO LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS D.P SATYAPRAKASH & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) Date : 15/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned. Issue notice. Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Appeal No.346 of 2013, shall remain stayed.Signature Not Verified (SANJAY KUMAR) (SNEH LATA SHARMA)Digitally signed bySanjay KumarDate: 2014.09.16 COURT MASTER COURT MASTER16:17:53 ISTReason: