1 ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2015 in FA No. 802/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 25/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kailash Vasudev,Sr.Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. Mr. Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Chandan Tiwari,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shikhar Garg,Adv. Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The impugned order is interim in nature. It requires the petitioners to deposit 75% of the decretal amount for the purpose of stay of money decree. By the interim order dated 10.04.2015, we have granted indulgence to the petitioners and permitted them to deposit a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lacs only) before the executing Court and since that amount has been deposited the execution proceedings has been stayed. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the
2 interim arrangement noted above is made absolute. The execution case shall remain stayed during the pendency of the First Appeal because of deposit already made by petitioners of a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/-. The Executing Court should invest the deposited amount in an interest bearing fixed deposit account of a nationalized Bank. Parties will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court for expeditious hearing of the appeal. The special leave petition is disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master
LISTED ON : 25.07.2016 BEFORE COURT NO.: 13 ITEM NO.:46 SECTIONIX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 9693 OF 2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ....PETITIONERS VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS OFFICE REPORT The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10th April, 2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order: "Issue notice returnable within eight weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted. There shall be stay of execution proceedings subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lacs only) before the executing court within six weeks hence." And lastly, the matter above mentioned was listed before the Court of Registrar on 09th February, 2016, when the following Order was passed: "The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules." It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that there are two respondents in the instant matter. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to both the respondents by registered A. D. post on 19.06.2017 as well as dasti in addition. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal and Ms. Amita Singh, Advocates have entered appearance and filed counteraffidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. Both the affidavits have been included in the paperbooks. Service of notice is complete. The matter abovementioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this report. Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2016. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Mr. Shriram P. Pingle, Advocate Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate L ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\1ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.13 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2015in FA No. 802/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay)INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s)(With interim relief and office report)Date : 25/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIFor Petitioner(s) Mr. Kailash Vasudev,Sr.Adv.Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv.Mr. Pratik Gaurav,Adv.Mr. Chandan Tiwari,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. Pragyan Sharma,Adv.Mr. Shikhar Garg,Adv.Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned counsel for the parties.The impugned order is interim in nature. It requiresthe petitioners to deposit 75% of the decretal amount forthe purpose of stay of money decree. By the interim orderdated 10.04.2015, we have granted indulgence to thepetitioners and permitted them to deposit a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lacs only) before theexecuting Court and since that amount has been depositedthe execution proceedings has been stayed.In the facts and circumstances of the case, the2interim arrangement noted above is made absolute. Theexecution case shall remain stayed during the pendency ofthe First Appeal because of deposit already made bypetitioners of a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/-. The ExecutingCourt should invest the deposited amount in an interestbearing fixed deposit account of a nationalized Bank. Parties will be at liberty to approach the concernedCourt for expeditious hearing of the appeal.The special leave petition is disposed of. (Madhu Bala) (Madhu Narula) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr.Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr.Shikhar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
àITEM NO.91 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESHPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUSJAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s)(with interim relief and office report)Date : 09/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.For Petitioner(s) Mr.Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr.Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr.Shikhar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E RThe respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Therespondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within theperiod stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall beprocessed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. (M V RAMESH) RegistrarSB
ITEM NO.68 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 01/12/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. Mr.Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Ms.Amita Singh Kalkal,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent No.2 to file the counter affidavit. List the matter again on 09.02.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar SB
ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shikhar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit as against the respondent No.1 which shows that notice could not be served on the said respondent as he did not receive the same. This is not a proper mode of valid service and therefore, fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above. List again on 1.12.2015. (K. ARUL) Registrar MG
R ITEM NO.58 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K. ARUL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 11/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pratik Gaurav,Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr. Shikhar Garg,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 shall file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit as against the respondent No.1 which shows that notice could not be served on the said respondent as he did not receive the same. This is not a proper mode of valid service and therefore, fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu Grover List again on 1.12.2015.Date: 2015.09.1410:03:37 SCTReason: (K. ARUL) Registrar MG
ITEM NO.112 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 13/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pratik Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List the matter on 11.09.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar JG
° ITEM NO.112 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) Date : 13/07/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Pratik Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R File not received. List the matter on 11.09.2015. (SURAJIT DEY) Registrar JGSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byMadhu GroverDate: 2015.07.1515:52:44 ISTReason:
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2015 in FA No. 802/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment) Date : 10/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice returnable within eight weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted. There shall be stay of execution proceedings subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees fifteen lacs only) before the executing court within six weeks hence. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master
ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2015 in FA No. 802/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let the matter be listed on 10.04.2015 to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to come with certain judgments from the High Court of Bombay. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court Master
Z ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.3 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9693/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/02/2015 in FA No. 802/2014 passed by the High Court Of Bombay) INPAC PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS JAYPRAKASH RAGHUNATH JADHAV AND ANR. Respondent(s) (with appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) Date : 01/04/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shriram P. Pingle,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Let the matter be listed on 10.04.2015 to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to come with certain judgments from the High Court of Bombay. (Gulshan Kumar Arora) (H.S. Parasher) Court Master Court MasterSignature Not VerifiedDigitally signed byGulshan Kumar AroraDate: 2015.04.0119:01:32 ISTReason: